Fatal Instinct

Posted by DJSprague 11 years, 2 months ago to Government
13 comments | Share | Flag

As population increases, as competition increases, the power of socialism increases. The U.S. Constitution is in trouble. How do you get the populace to get a perspective to their survival instincts?


All Comments

  • Posted by khalling 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    humans have reflexes not instincts. humans don't have innate knowledge. they are not born knowing how to build a house. A bird, taken away from its mother will still build a nest. I repeat, humans are NOT driven by biological instinct
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The proposition of "Fatal Instinct" is 'if the system is proceeding irrationally, as the progression and dominance of socialism verifies, then its basis is irrational or "instinctive," driven by biological instincts that have no perspective to themselves.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    lol I was just thinking... Obama supporters actually have this condition, "Fatal Attraction"....they just don't realize that THEY are the rabbit in the pot.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by UncommonSense 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Doh! (Facepalm) You are most correct. I should have known. But, the last sentence still stands: no rabbits in the boiler!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by UncommonSense 11 years, 2 months ago
    Fatal Instinct? Nope. Try Basic Instinct. But, keep an eye on your rabbit!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 11 years, 2 months ago
    D.J.
    You are a collectivist/environmentalist bent on the destruction of humans.
    Here are some words in your paper that tell me this.
    "flock" vs individual, "ecosystem" vs species, "instinct" vs reason, "limited resources", "environmental stress increases", "weapons too great to be used", "food that should not be eaten" vs. technology and capitalism.
    You don't ever use the word entropy-but the psuedo-science of Rifkin, Gore are implicit in your premise. Ultimately you will advocate for mass murder through denial of freedoms in order to save the planet.
    Take this BS elsewhere
    but I give you a point to further the discussion
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo