"A riveting account of the raging debate over the future of our Constitution between those who contend that judges must 'defer' to legislatures and those who view the judiciary as an equal branch of government whose mandate is to secure the rights and liberties of the people by holding government to its just powers.

A new book just released to detail the continuing battle for individual rights against democratic majority rule. Haven't read it yet, but which side do Objectivist fall on and is it as large a problem as I think it is?

Discussion??