What is even worse than her lack of any sense of reality, common sense, economic sense and respect for freedom is the people who believe and agree with her.
Worse is that there is such a large portion of the nation that doesn't know any better. They've been so indoctrinated that such ideas don't seem fundamentally wrong to them.
Whose TV mentality and attention span have been and continue to be carefully conditioned for emotional response to the shallowest narratives and automatically drive or are bused to default voting en masse.
YOU DIDN'T BUILD THAT! (Well someone builds her pant suits...all fat in the middle trying to conceal what's goin' on in there.) ... sorry, I'm in a mood. OH WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE NOW??!
The laughter in the audience testifies to the success of 100 years of Marx-Alinsky-Dewey (MAD) indoctrination. If the facts of history conflict with your rhetoric, then change history. I hate it but they're winning.
My dog has a better understanding of how his food gets into cans than this woman has of basic economics. This kind of ignorance would be laughable if it wasn't so terrifyingly dangerous.
Can't someone pull the microphone from her and make a public announcement that Ms. Clinton is an accomplice in the murder of the embassy personnel, so she can be permanently shut down.
If Mrs. Clinton wins, I am leaving the country as there will be nothing left when she is through. I have seen enough pain and suffering due to the administrations policies and it is only going to get worse as she will finish destroying what Obama has started. The Progressive destruction of our society is getting to the tipping point of no return. We need another Reagan but I don't see that in any that are a possible candidates. I could be wrong but I see the Republican Establishment falling right in line with the Progressives. There will be a political elite and then the cows that are milked for everything they have to fund the Progressive monetary finality. If you cannot make everybody rich, then use the power of government to make everybody equally poor.
She is right about everything being scripted. My guess would be that this was designed to fire up the base but it's long enough before the election that most others will forget it.
Did someone say "scripted"? My cynicism meter pegs, and I "call bull shit" (CBS), every time I see ads for the upcoming TV show, Madam Secretary. It will probably run long enough to paint a hugely sympathetic image of how hard it is to be a female Secretary of State, and how 'mean spirited' the opposition can be when "they don't have the whole story."
Wow. Corporations and businesses are the ONLY thing that creates job. Govts and non-profits are funded by business.
I can only guess at what she might have meant. Maybe there was context before it where she was refuting an argument that misused the fact business creates jobs. If we take her quote at face value it's absurd. It _sounds_ like she's been in govt too long and doesn't give much thought to the hard work behind tax revenues.
I don't think so. They've been showered with it, for sure, but I haven't seen that they have been money grubbers. That's a criticism that I don't think fits.
With Bill it's about the ladies. With Hillary it's the money. Whitewater was her undertaking. And who can forget her ridiculous assertion of leaving the White House broke. BTW. Taxpayers are paying the mortgage on their NY home through a contract they imposed on the Secret Service before leaving office.
She is pandering to the far left base of the party. They believe in comments like "you didn't build that". She is laser focused on winning the White House in 2016. She lost the nomination to Obama in 2008 because she failed to inspire the base. She ran as if she already had the nomination. She won't make that mistake again.
"They believe in comments like "you didn't build that". " Their going after President Obama's comments out of context just shows they have little legitimate to criticize about him. Clinton's comment, OTOH, is opposite from the truth. Businesses and people eager to help them are the ONLY thing that creates jobs.
"How is it out of context? He believes that government helped every business that has succeeded. " He was saying gov't provides the non-excludable goods and services that make business possible. I consider this a basic uncontroversial fact. His critics latched onto it because they don't have much to work with.
If I didn't know any better, I would have assumed she had read Atlas Shrugged and now was throwing it in our faces.
Why, she sounded like Wesley Mouch and Eugene Lawson at that discussion, in Wesley Mouch's office, before Mr. Thompson told them to go ahead with Directive 10-289.
This is complete madness. It is so far from reality that I am filled with wonder that anyone can believe such utter crap. She should be locked away, and yet, the wonder of it is that she has a such a substantial amount of followers.
I see the little commie is still disparaging what came to be called "trickle down" economics. IMHO, it was the Reagan policies that eventually brought about the economic boom of the '90s, which the Clintons are quick to to take credit for and the Lame Stream Media is so quick to back them up. The deep hole the country was heading into by the time Carter got done wouldn't be fixed by some economic step function, but a lead-lag curve that took years to come to fruition. It seems nobody learned from that and "here we are again". I believe, much to our chagrin, that HC will be our next president. The "useful idiots" are way too numerous and the elections will be fixed for her to win. The economy will finally roll over dead and the blame will be placed on folks like us.
Hi, kids! It's time for good fun! It's time to watch Hillary and Nancy tell Charlie the Unicorn all about Candy Mountain where Obamacare awaits to perform a medical procedure--
According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, there are about 156 million people working in the United States. From federal employees all the way down to local police and firefighters, I have seen estimates that as many as 40 million people work for the government.
Since she doesn’t think corporations and businesses create jobs, just who does Hillary think created the other 116 million jobs in this country?
So, a bureaucrat in Washington creates jobs in Kansas? Really?
Obviously, government-pumped economies work well, just look at the business environment around the Beltway... What Recession? was kind of the mantra since 2007... But the further away you move, and with a noticeable effect about 20 miles out and farther, it has less and less of an effect. By the time you hit West Virginia, you might as well be in Kansas for all the impact it has.
These people need to get out more and talk to people other than the ones that paid $1500 / plate to snap a selfie with them from 150 feet away.
I getting sick and tired. I need to take a break. These people are making me sick. They have nothing of any substance to say anymore. It's all about rhetoric, lies, and deceptions. War on women, You didn't build that, Corporations and businesses don't create jobs. Maybe they mean that we all should work for the government. They can pay us because they can just print the money, if only they can find someone that can make the paper and the ink. Those that can't work for the government can join the military. And of course there is always room in the State governments too. The rest, if any are left over,can become college professors.
It would be very interesting to see what would happen if the corporations and businesses that Hillary is talking about that “don't create jobs”, would just shut down all at the same time for about a week.
What is this ditz talking about? Does she even know? Does she really believe what she is saying, I noticed how she keeps looking at her notes like she hasn't studied her speech, doesn't know what's in it, or perhaps does really believe in what she is saying? Regardless, what she is saying does not make any sense and here again is absolutely no fact in any of it that she has or could cite to back up her claims. This speech seems to be more of her trying to follow the nonsense that our current administration used to get elected. “You didn’t build that”, “You don’t create jobs”, next we’ll be hearing that Americans are lazy, and good for nothing, the government will provide for all. Soon we will all have to start to get sick of it.
Hillary is an idiot. She is also a vicious bitxx. Sorry, its not politically correct, but correct nonetheless. If we all want to get to a venezuela-style economy faster, we should elect her in 2016, as well as re-elect Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi
I can't believe she still is saying she is not sure if she is running. I think she feels entitled to the White House and she desperately wants the historical significance of first female President.
There is another civil war coming between the progressives and the libertarians. It cannot be stopped at this point. The only question is the timing and the spark that initiates it.
https://www.facebook.com/LibertarianGirl...
Hillary is repugnant.
I can only guess at what she might have meant. Maybe there was context before it where she was refuting an argument that misused the fact business creates jobs. If we take her quote at face value it's absurd. It _sounds_ like she's been in govt too long and doesn't give much thought to the hard work behind tax revenues.
Their going after President Obama's comments out of context just shows they have little legitimate to criticize about him.
Clinton's comment, OTOH, is opposite from the truth. Businesses and people eager to help them are the ONLY thing that creates jobs.
He was saying gov't provides the non-excludable goods and services that make business possible. I consider this a basic uncontroversial fact. His critics latched onto it because they don't have much to work with.
Why, she sounded like Wesley Mouch and Eugene Lawson at that discussion, in Wesley Mouch's office, before Mr. Thompson told them to go ahead with Directive 10-289.
embarrassing herself. Give it a rest, Hil, and
go home. You're tired.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsGYh8Aac...
Since she doesn’t think corporations and businesses create jobs, just who does Hillary think created the other 116 million jobs in this country?
Obviously, government-pumped economies work well, just look at the business environment around the Beltway... What Recession? was kind of the mantra since 2007... But the further away you move, and with a noticeable effect about 20 miles out and farther, it has less and less of an effect. By the time you hit West Virginia, you might as well be in Kansas for all the impact it has.
These people need to get out more and talk to people other than the ones that paid $1500 / plate to snap a selfie with them from 150 feet away.
What is this ditz talking about? Does she even know? Does she really believe what she is saying, I noticed how she keeps looking at her notes like she hasn't studied her speech, doesn't know what's in it, or perhaps does really believe in what she is saying? Regardless, what she is saying does not make any sense and here again is absolutely no fact in any of it that she has or could cite to back up her claims. This speech seems to be more of her trying to follow the nonsense that our current administration used to get elected. “You didn’t build that”, “You don’t create jobs”, next we’ll be hearing that Americans are lazy, and good for nothing, the government will provide for all. Soon we will all have to start to get sick of it.
It just means people get paid to try make people not get along with their neighbors.
Load more comments...