Discussion: Experience vs Conventional Wisdom

Posted by $ AJAshinoff 9 years, 7 months ago to Philosophy
4 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

I will openly admit that I am not as well read on Objectivism as I am on a great many things. That said, there is some question as to the validity of conventional wisdom (corporate opinion?) over personal experience. It seems to me, and I may be wrong, that conventional wisdom superseding experience is irrational. Certainly exceptions to this "rule" can and do apply since not everyone experiences the same things in life AND to limit one self to the range of ones personal experiences could create a shallow person.

I contend that conventional wisdom is acceptable as a default only when its merit is supported by reason. Further, I contend that conventional wisdom even when supported by reason is TRUMPED by first hand experience to things as it relates to you and your decision making in your life. The individual's experience is the utmost authority to the individual when shaping his/her view, actions, and creed.

Opinions?


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by Zenphamy 9 years, 7 months ago
    AJ, I couldn't agree more. What in the world is a life worth lived by someone else's rules? Your own experiences and gaining them is the value of life.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 7 months ago
    Conventional wisdom is often based on folklore. It happens even in high-tech. Rules-of-thumb are sometimes passed down without any science behind them.

    Personal experience is good, but it's not a substitute for a large random sample. Rare things are bound to happen to some people. You need large random samples and blinded experiments to get at the truth.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years, 7 months ago
      Interesting take. However whats directly around you, those things you experience personally or observe personally (be that news, news paper, or trusted hearsay from someone you know) weigh more heavily in "truth" to you personally no?

      Wouldn't an objectivist be more concerned with the truth of anything as it relates to his/her own immediate sphere of reality, where it most impacts his/her domain?

      CW isn't always based on folklore, in fact multiculturalism is more based on common opinion than fact or folklore as was the hOpe and change lie.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 7 months ago
        I try to trust sources related blinded tests on random samples. This is an ideal that can't be achieved, but I trust the principle of blinded testing of hypotheses.

        Regarding multiculuralism, it's a concept, not a claim. A claim might be "large organizations with people from diffierent cultures outperform similar organizations that are culturally homogenous." We could test that. The very notion of different cultures living together is just a an idea, not a claim to prove or disprove.

        I normally say different cultures living together is just part of American life. Right now I'm staying in downtown London. I love to tout the US, but London lives the multicultural dream more than my home in Madison.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo