That's very nice!

I don't think that plan will work on Martha's Vineyard though I'm reasonably sure the residents there will support the idea for elsewhere.

One idea that is being floated . . .
Financial incentives (federal fiat funny money) will be offered to homeowners to "rent" out their extra rooms to the illegals.
The rent-offset payments will continue until all of the cancer cells are voluntarily absorbed into the available homes.
Then the crack (fiat funny money) is halted.
Existing laws will prevent the homeowners from expelling the invited cancer cells.
Enter the engineered widespread social - political - economic mayhem.
Wash - rinse - repeat.
All of this nonsense is orchestrated by design.

Even IF this could be instituted, we'd need to deal with the cost and tragedy of the crimes that never would've happened. Remember Martha's Vineyard would not even take the 10 "migrants" (out of 50) that they had housing for.

Build a Walmart, south of the border.

Then, not only will the illegal alien issue decrease, we might even lose some BLM rioters to Mexico.

Sounds complicated and difficult to implement.
For example, how long did it take for the beautiful people to get the Crimaleins off Marthas Vineyard? Days? Hours? Minutes?
You will never get a Leftist, committed or not, to sacrifice a penny for the "Greater Good"™
Ain't happen'. No Way. No How.

To solution is simple and direct:
Get them the EFF out of our country!
The cost of rounding them up and dumping (litterly dumping them) right over the frickin border where they crossed over.
How much will it cost?
Hell, a tiny fraction of what WE, YES WE, are paying now! Never mind what it gonna cost in the coming years and decades.
WE can afford to spend thousands each to round up and ship out each and every illegal, and it will still only be pennies on the dollar, rather then allow them to stay and suck off the teat of legal Americans for decades/centuries to come.
You and I where never asked if we wanted 30,000,000 non-english speaking, uneducated, unskilled, poor, unmotivated, and as news reports come out every day: diseased, mentally defective and murderous coming here simply as economic refugees.

Our forefathers specifically banned economic refugees, for good reason.

Why are the DemonRats doing this?
To destroy the country? Check!
To bring in Sex workers (including children)? Check!
To Bring in Slave workers? Check!
The Bring in voters for greater dependency (i.e. Democrat Voters)? Check!

Tongue-in-cheek it may be, but some of these ideas sound like fun--for us!

This I like, though instead of the Aleutians, I propose deep in the heart of Alaska. Then we close the border between Alaska and Canada.

As humor I love you idea. If looked at practically it would just have people registering as something other than Demonrat and then still voting as Demonrat.

Easier to just have every illegal who enters this country have a Sponsor, probably a Democrat, who will be responsible for everything including any criminal activity the migrant gets into.

Cuba don't want 10 million plus turds in Gitmo. Like that dummycrat once said all that weight on one side of the island would cause it to tip over.

It is almost the same as charity donations plummeting after welfare was instituted. Charity is WAY better. If you agree, you fund. You don't get to have a 51% majority and force 49% to be your slave.

Add it to the Solution!!

Exactly - that is my point.

And the named Democrat NOT opening their home, loses their VOTER ID. They cannot vote in the future.

Because we can't get rid of them, and can't stop them for now, so our hero here has come up with another idea: "Let the scum that want an open border, deal with the open border.", and the rest of us move on.

This sure as shit would get Progressives voted out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I like it. Dems want them, dems can pay for them. Why should the rest of us pay (e.g. taxes via government)?

Perfect!

5 minutes of this, and even the dems would vote their own out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Recently the Mayor of Monument, CO stated firmly they are not a sanctuary city. On one website that I have to go to when I need a chuckle as most are from CA transplanted to CO with mega million dollar houses with tons of lands eaten up surround them as well, they are the ONLY ones that scoff at this decision. But, do they offer to give up what they have to these grifters...Invaders....NO.

https://notthebee.com/article/local-n...

Either way, the flow of immigrants should drop to a tiny trickle. 👍

The thought behind my proposal is to put the burden of responsibility on the idiots that caused the problem in the first place. I listed it under "Humor" in case the DOJ or IRS harasses me - "What, can't you take a joke?" Can you imagine the uproar if someone in Congress actually made the proposal? Or Trump made an Executive Order when elected.?

I'm starting to appreciate your Aleutians as a final destination plan, but a stop over in Gitmo for processing to determine whether or not asylum/entry should be granted at all should still be part of their journey. Granted is a trip to the Aleutians. Not granted offers several options: - walk through the gate to Cuba, await transportation to their home country or elsewhere they may be accepted, remain in Gitmo.

Why should anyone house hoards of invaders?
If they can't be sent back to the place of their birth, ship them
to the Aleutians and let them build their own housing.
They get a similar chance at the pursuit of happiness that the
colonists in Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Hampshire,
New York and Vermont did.

lol, that is the best idea I have heard in a long time

True, but Ben_C's plan is a good start. Part of the fine imposed on refusing Dems can be used to fund deportation.