No, unfortunately, it is all of us who will be assuming the position...

I'm not a philosopher, psychologist, psychiatrist, nor political strategist, but even I know this scotus candidate is...well... shit.

Wait I'm confused. Do you mean if the mother/father is white/black? Don't the childred always come out in between? Lighter than black?

I think it is interesting these black people want to be the majority but they are marrying white people more and more. It seems strange to me when black people marry white people, their children get lighter skin but when white people marry black people their children don't get darker skin. How do they plan to wipe out the white people?

Hope so.

Why me dino hopes the Jackass Party plan to turn a flood of Hispanic illegals into voters to achieve one party rule will backfire at least in the long run.

Not knowing what a woman is she wouldn't make a very good escort. But what does Hunter care he'd train her.

Although, in 2018 The jackasses lost among Hispanics despite their prediction of winning more...a lot of Hispanic people are Catholic, against abortion and want to work.

https://youtu.be/-7aHeKkZJ1s?t=50

Back during the Nineties me dino heard it won't be blacks but Hispanics who becomes the dominant race here in about 50 years.
And that was before the Jackass Party got stupid about allowing wide open borders.

The names you mentioned......dependable assholes

Forgive me, but my question is mechanistic in nature. I recognize that the original intent of the Founders has been lost over time, but my question is directed at the original intent.

Ideally, any elected official should innately recognize that natural rights are inviolate, but one of the key elements of the Founders' view was to recognize humans are flawed, and the structure they established was intended to be able to respond to unlawful behavior by government officials. That's why, when the issue of the SCOTUS not having been specifically authorized to make rulings on constitutionality of government actions came up, I asked who then, under the structure laid out in the Constitution, should make those judgements.

Ideally, every American citizen should be respectful of the natural rights of every other citizen, but we are human. When someone in a position of authority abuses their power and violates the natural rights of a citizen without the power to overcome that abuse, I have no doubt the Founders had in mind a mechanism to correct that. Given the means of abuse available to the Executive and Legislative elements of our government, it seems proper that the Judicial branch should act as the shield against such abuses. Again, I'm addressing original intent, not our current degraded situation.

Having just watched Ken Burns' biography of Ben Franklin, I think you are right. His natural intelligence included a healthy understanding of human vice which tempered his negotiations with peers and foreign relations, while he readily enjoyed the perks of the elite.
Of course for today's audience, several segments steered into his treatment of slavery. Overall, it was a decent production, since the Founders did address the problem but could only open the door to abolition on the margins in order to establish the union.
One could say that, between the Fed and WEF, we're all slaves now.

The founders intent was to have a government of devolution.
The Federal Government is anything but that. That said
Congress has limited enforcement authority for the fourteenth amendment .

Definition of decide.
cause to come to a resolution.
make a choice from a number of alternatives.

Definition of Judge
a public official appointed to DECIDE cases in a court of law

A lifetime appointment to the Highest Court Sen Cruz “Nominee Black Woman, what is a woman?” Pro pedo file Black Woman responds “ I can’t decide”
Majority of pedo file Senators respond. “YOUR HIRED”

Let’s not forget Alaska’s Murcowfaceski .
U.S. Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson secured the support of two more Senate Republicans on Monday, as she cleared a procedural hurdle toward becoming the first Black woman to serve on the nation's top judicial body.

Republicans Lisa Murkowski and Mitt Romney joined Susan Collins in saying they would vote to confirm Jackson, 51, to a lifetime seat on the court later this week. They also supported a procedural 53-47 vote to bring her nomination to the Senate floor after the Senate Judiciary Committee deadlocked 11-11 along party lines on whether to advance the nomination.

Murkowski and Romney, who do not serve on the Judiciary Committee, announced their backing of Jackson as the Senate began voting to "discharge" the nomination from the panel, propelling it to the full Senate

Sad that this is the person selected by Color and Sex
A black women as The fraud in chief said he wanted.
I wonder if he heard that somewhere .....hmm perhaps and it stuck in his non cognitive
Mush between his fake ears. Perhaps Hunter was ordering an escort and the big guy got confused.

In saying "if you can keep it" Franklin was referring to the "people" and, apparently, he foresaw us not being up to the task.

Someone once said (John Ray 1670?) "the road to hell is paved with good intentions."

I contend we are on a highway traveling at break-neck speeds and too damn stupid to stop.

As usual, the attempt to make things better makes it worse. We're going to fix racism against blacks, by being racist against everyone else.

It blew my mind when I saw BrainDead on TV saying, "You know, someday the white race will no longer be the majority. And is gonna' be great! It's the source of our strength!

Are we really? Do we still think the magna carta is an influence in what we've devolved to? I certainly don't see equal justice and it has nothing to do with race politics. The Bill of Rights, the entire constitution for that matter,is only sacrosanct if the populace understands it and those elected solemnly respect it. We, this country as a people, are a pathetic joke of lost potential.

Franklin when asked replied "A republic, if you can keep it." I think any answer comes from the meaning of that statement, if one is even possible.

I have no solution as to how we get back or how we enforce natural rights anymore. Transgression is the name of the game coming from DC. We are a degenerate nation that deserves wrath. Frankly, I'm embarrassed ever to have served.

I think the answer you seek is: We, the People.

Appears she has been making a skin color career with her lawyer degree.
A so-called Reverend race hustler Al Sharpton suddenly springs to mind.
Me dino mind can be kinda quirky for sniffing out things that may relate.

Still, we are a nation of laws, as the founders intended, so the question remains: if the Bill of Rights is an overarching mandate on all states, what is the agent with the power of enforcement that rules on instances of violation of those individual natural rights?

She should just assume the position.