13

Judicial ethics and Roberts completely misses the boat

Posted by $ blarman 2 years, 4 months ago to Government
8 comments | Share | Flag

I question the wisdom of having judges decide for themselves which cases they should recuse themselves from. Justice Kagan is a classic example, as she failed to recuse herself from the Obergfell case even though she had been a lawyer in the State Department arguing it!

Judges who refuse to recuse themselves should be up for automatic impeachment...

All Comments

  • Posted by mccannon01 2 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "...judges refused to hear the evidence." That is so irritating I can't wrap my brain around it. It underscores the notion the Founding Fathers attempted lay the foundation of a justice system, but we somehow ended up with a legal system and the two are not the same.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 2 years, 4 months ago
    Roberts has been compromised in my opinion. Maybe it's a Epstein thing or similar...I don't know for sure. But, there's something going on there...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ katrinam41 2 years, 4 months ago
    There is not one branch of this government that can be said to do the proper job they were elected, appointed or hired to do. I can see no way to clean the mess up short of a complete failure of the entire system.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 2 years, 4 months ago
    They are taking the title 'Supreme' to mean them. Bad move.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 2 years, 4 months ago
    👍 Thanks, blarman.
    Hardly any surprise that in nearly every challenge to the stolen 2020 election, judges refused to hear the evidence. Traitors abound in the judiciary.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 2 years, 4 months ago
    Roberts should not use words he does not understand, like "ethics"
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo