Buy-dem’s Bounty on Your Life: Hospitals’ Incentive Payments for COVID-19 (Estimated at $100,000 per patient)
Posted by freedomforall 2 years, 11 months ago to Politics
Excerpt:
"Upon admission to a once-trusted hospital, American patients with COVID-19 become virtual prisoners, subjected to a rigid treatment protocol with roots in Ezekiel Emanuel’s “Complete Lives System” for rationing medical care in those over age 50. They have a shockingly high mortality rate. How and why is this happening, and what can be done about it?
As exposed in audio recordings, hospital executives in Arizona admitted meeting several times a week to lower standards of care, with coordinated restrictions on visitation rights. Most COVID-19 patients’ families are deliberately kept in the dark about what is really being done to their loved ones.
The combination that enables this tragic and avoidable loss of hundreds of thousands of lives includes (1) The CARES Act, which provides hospitals with bonus incentive payments for all things related to COVID-19 (testing, diagnosing, admitting to hospital, use of remdesivir and ventilators, reporting COVID-19 deaths, and vaccinations) and (2) waivers of customary and long-standing patient rights by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
In 2020, the Texas Hospital Association submitted requests for waivers to CMS. According to Texas attorney Jerri Ward, “CMS has granted ‘waivers’ of federal law regarding patient rights. Specifically, CMS purports to allow hospitals to violate the rights of patients or their surrogates with regard to medical record access, to have patient visitation, and to be free from seclusion.” She notes that “rights do not come from the hospital or CMS and cannot be waived, as that is the antithesis of a ‘right.’ The purported waivers are meant to isolate and gain total control over the patient and to deny patient and patient’s decision-maker the ability to exercise informed consent.”
Creating a “National Pandemic Emergency” provided justification for such sweeping actions that override individual physician medical decision-making and patients’ rights. The CARES Act provides incentives for hospitals to use treatments dictated solely by the federal government under the auspices of the NIH. These “bounties” must paid back if not “earned” by making the COVID-19 diagnosis and following the COVID-19 protocol.
The hospital payments include:
A “free” required PCR test in the Emergency Room or upon admission for every patient, with government-paid fee to hospital.
Added bonus payment for each positive COVID-19 diagnosis.
Another bonus for a COVID-19 admission to the hospital.
A 20 percent “boost” bonus payment from Medicare on the entire hospital bill for use of remdesivir instead of medicines such as Ivermectin.
Another and larger bonus payment to the hospital if a COVID-19 patient is mechanically ventilated.
More money to the hospital if cause of death is listed as COVID-19, even if patient did not die directly of COVID-19.
A COVID-19 diagnosis also provides extra payments to coroners.
CMS implemented “value-based” payment programs that track data such as how many workers at a healthcare facility receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Now we see why many hospitals implemented COVID-19 vaccine mandates. They are paid more.
Outside hospitals, physician MIPS quality metrics link doctors’ income to performance-based pay for treating patients with COVID-19 EUA drugs. Failure to report information to CMS can cost the physician 4% of reimbursement.
Because of obfuscation with medical coding and legal jargon, we cannot be certain of the actual amount each hospital receives per COVID-19 patient. But Attorney Thomas Renz and CMS whistleblowers have calculated a total payment of at least $100,000 per patient.
What does this mean for your health and safety as a patient in the hospital?
There are deaths from the government-directed COVID treatments. For remdesivir, studies show that 71–75 percent of patients suffer an adverse effect, and the drug often had to be stopped after five to ten days because of these effects, such as kidney and liver damage, and death. Remdesivir trials during the 2018 West African Ebola outbreak had to be discontinued because death rate exceeded 50%. Yet, in 2020, Anthony Fauci directed that remdesivir was to be the drug hospitals use to treat COVID-19, even when the COVID clinical trials of remdesivir showed similar adverse effects."
The article has links to supporting references. If you doubt the article's statements, read the supporting data.
"Upon admission to a once-trusted hospital, American patients with COVID-19 become virtual prisoners, subjected to a rigid treatment protocol with roots in Ezekiel Emanuel’s “Complete Lives System” for rationing medical care in those over age 50. They have a shockingly high mortality rate. How and why is this happening, and what can be done about it?
As exposed in audio recordings, hospital executives in Arizona admitted meeting several times a week to lower standards of care, with coordinated restrictions on visitation rights. Most COVID-19 patients’ families are deliberately kept in the dark about what is really being done to their loved ones.
The combination that enables this tragic and avoidable loss of hundreds of thousands of lives includes (1) The CARES Act, which provides hospitals with bonus incentive payments for all things related to COVID-19 (testing, diagnosing, admitting to hospital, use of remdesivir and ventilators, reporting COVID-19 deaths, and vaccinations) and (2) waivers of customary and long-standing patient rights by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
In 2020, the Texas Hospital Association submitted requests for waivers to CMS. According to Texas attorney Jerri Ward, “CMS has granted ‘waivers’ of federal law regarding patient rights. Specifically, CMS purports to allow hospitals to violate the rights of patients or their surrogates with regard to medical record access, to have patient visitation, and to be free from seclusion.” She notes that “rights do not come from the hospital or CMS and cannot be waived, as that is the antithesis of a ‘right.’ The purported waivers are meant to isolate and gain total control over the patient and to deny patient and patient’s decision-maker the ability to exercise informed consent.”
Creating a “National Pandemic Emergency” provided justification for such sweeping actions that override individual physician medical decision-making and patients’ rights. The CARES Act provides incentives for hospitals to use treatments dictated solely by the federal government under the auspices of the NIH. These “bounties” must paid back if not “earned” by making the COVID-19 diagnosis and following the COVID-19 protocol.
The hospital payments include:
A “free” required PCR test in the Emergency Room or upon admission for every patient, with government-paid fee to hospital.
Added bonus payment for each positive COVID-19 diagnosis.
Another bonus for a COVID-19 admission to the hospital.
A 20 percent “boost” bonus payment from Medicare on the entire hospital bill for use of remdesivir instead of medicines such as Ivermectin.
Another and larger bonus payment to the hospital if a COVID-19 patient is mechanically ventilated.
More money to the hospital if cause of death is listed as COVID-19, even if patient did not die directly of COVID-19.
A COVID-19 diagnosis also provides extra payments to coroners.
CMS implemented “value-based” payment programs that track data such as how many workers at a healthcare facility receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Now we see why many hospitals implemented COVID-19 vaccine mandates. They are paid more.
Outside hospitals, physician MIPS quality metrics link doctors’ income to performance-based pay for treating patients with COVID-19 EUA drugs. Failure to report information to CMS can cost the physician 4% of reimbursement.
Because of obfuscation with medical coding and legal jargon, we cannot be certain of the actual amount each hospital receives per COVID-19 patient. But Attorney Thomas Renz and CMS whistleblowers have calculated a total payment of at least $100,000 per patient.
What does this mean for your health and safety as a patient in the hospital?
There are deaths from the government-directed COVID treatments. For remdesivir, studies show that 71–75 percent of patients suffer an adverse effect, and the drug often had to be stopped after five to ten days because of these effects, such as kidney and liver damage, and death. Remdesivir trials during the 2018 West African Ebola outbreak had to be discontinued because death rate exceeded 50%. Yet, in 2020, Anthony Fauci directed that remdesivir was to be the drug hospitals use to treat COVID-19, even when the COVID clinical trials of remdesivir showed similar adverse effects."
The article has links to supporting references. If you doubt the article's statements, read the supporting data.
I will drop dead from a fever before I trust a medical professional. They devolved into more untrustworthy and deplorable animals than even politicians.
Living Wills, medical PoAs area already signed!
I can afford to self-insure, so I will. And with that savings, in 4 years, we will be nearing a full on hospital stay.
No fears about Covid, and took control of my health almost 4 years ago.
Honestly... Our grandparents didn't have health insurance! Nor did theirs... I think it's all a scam nowadays.
they have to treat me. After that, we can negotiate what they will settle for. We've seen illegals have EXPENSIVE births, and not pay a dime, but got citizenship for their child. How nice.
Thanks for the offer, we did look into it.
I now see doctors who take direct customers, and work for me!
Sickness insurance premiums today are insane. Insurance is almost as big a con as government and banking.
Cash or Self-Pay.
I do all my own labs anyways.
I've been on the fringe for a while... LOL
At least they did not try to kill me with a ventilator. Otherwise they did everything they could including Vit D3, C and Zinc. Except no ivermectin or HCQ. The nurse rendered excellent care. I had dropped right into major pneumonia.
I believe some of the meds were indeed helpful, but I also know the Herbs really pulled me through and cleaned up my lungs afterward.
I am in the process of writing this up as a case study for publication. In retrospect I think the remdedivir was useless. The rest it was helpful and may have saved my life.
Regards,
Lloyd
You might want to send your experience to AAPS when you have it written.
Learn all you can about herbal treatments and self care. Get help finding a doctor who will treat with hydrochloroquine and ivermectin just in case.
Now if I were choosing, would I select:
-a vax that is claimed to be very good, but wipes out the body's existing immune system?
or
a vax, or treatment, that builds up and enhances what is there already?
Then, I discover that the "very good" is actually a bit better than chance, mostly, and, there are additional risks.
My husband and I have not contracted Covid but share a similar lack of desire to turn ourselves over to the 'tender mercies' of the hospital. As a result of that, we are sitting on a nice little cache of meds (both prophylactic and treatments) that we have collected from various places. Cost was a bit high, but in the end, worth it for the peace of mind.
Got to visit a bit this weekend with my brother in law who is an RN, EMT, Paramedic, and a bunch of other things. He has not taken the vaccine and will not. He did mention that a neti pot and DAILY sinus flushes are a good first step to prevention, as the sinuses are where the spikes set up to get started (this is what HE said.... I am not a medical pro and not telling anyone to do anything! )
(I think I called him "Ho" in a prev post).
He traveled from HongKong to Illinois to see his family especially the one-year-old grand-daughter. Grandpa Ng caught the virus, went into hospital, got worse every day. They gave no effective treatment, refused to give ivermectin. The family got it given but had to get a court order. The process took several critical days, great obstruction from the hospital. Even in late stage, ivermectin worked and Grandpa Ng recovered and walked out.
The hospital attitude explainable- they lose a lot of money by giving an un-authorized medication.
In normal times this great schmulzy story would be all over msm.
Now, it is reported, I have 4 or 5 refs, but not on msm.
The same old story, much gov money sloshing around to create jobs and influence decisions, the lesson to us is if do not take the vax see what happens, at least in this case, the victim escaped.