12

US Attorney General's Conflict of Interest in Ordering FBI to Investigate (and Prosecute) Parents Resisting Critical Race Theory. His Family Sells CRT Indoctrination Materials To Schools

Posted by freedomforall 2 years, 7 months ago to Politics
22 comments | Share | Flag

"Well, well, well… This is interesting. U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland recently instructed the FBI to begin investigating parents who confront school board administrators over Critical Race Theory indoctrination material. The U.S. Department of Justice issued a memorandum to the FBI instructing them to initiate investigations of any parent attending a local school board meeting who might be viewed as confrontational, intimidating or harassing. Attorney General Merrick Garland’s daughter is Rebecca Garland. In 2018 Rebecca Garland married Xan Tanner [LINK]. Mr. Xan Tanner is the current co-founder of a controversial education service company called Panorama Education. [LINK and LINK] Panorama Education is the “social learning” resource material provider to school districts and teachers that teach Critical Race Theory. Conflict of interest much? Yes, the Attorney General is instructing the FBI to investigate parents who might pose a financial threat to the business of his daughter’s husband." More here: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/c...


All Comments

  • Posted by chad 2 years, 7 months ago
    Even if they are never prosecuted a file containing information that they were investigated can always be used to bolster a new investigation; stating that this person has always been a troublemaker.
    In the meantime of course he benefits from not having his material questioned or ignored affecting the sales and income from disreputable material.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Temlakos 2 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Agreed. But I fear, and respect, brass more than hypocrisy. If Merrick Garland is Gerald Starnes, Jr., then AOC is Ivy Starnes.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Orwellian 2 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Watch the latest installment of God's Not Dead We the People. It addresses this exact issue. Who is in charge of educating your children?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 2 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Guess next time I'll try to write something like "Democrats (along with sneakier termites for RINOs)."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 2 years, 7 months ago
    Schools should be provided by the market, not by government and especially not by the federal government, which has no constitutional power to have anything to do with education except for DC and federal enclaves (it's not in the list of Congress' enumerated powers in Article I, Section 8).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 2 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Had a feeling my remark may attract you about 30 seconds after I wrote.
    Then I thought, "Aw, let it stand."
    Way I see it, a RINO is one of the more sneaky Democrats.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Temlakos 2 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Terence McAuliffe, carpetbagger and de facto real-estate selling agent for the Clintons, did indeed say that.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Temlakos 2 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes. For them, the ends justify the means. They share this in common with Muslims, who deem it acceptable to tell a lie, so long as one knows the truth, and the lie will advance their overriding agenda.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Temlakos 2 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That's hypocritical of him. He doesn't really believe a word of it. But he does believe, and know, that it is useful to gain power. He is at heart a demagogue.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Temlakos 2 years, 7 months ago
    Even without the venal financial-conflict angle, his ideology disqualifies him from any office of honor, trust or profit under these United States or indeed any of them. That order from him totally violates two key tenets of the First Amendment: freedom of speech, and the right of the people to assemble peaceably and petition their government for redress of grievances.

    Merrick Garland was once up for a Supreme Court seat, this after the death (murder?) of Antonin Scalia. He has just proved himself singularly unqualified for that office.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 2 years, 7 months ago
    A conflict of interest created by one of their own is A-OK with a group of Marxist elitists all into into fixing elections and other crimes of high treason.
    Should you not be buddy-buddy with those commie control freaks, who are just so cool with BLM burning down cities and killing people, well~~~
    Commit a crime? Too bad. You do the time!
    That also goes for those special new crimes such as disapproving of CRT being taught to your kids.
    Just shut up and obey your "betters," you uppity little terrorist racist, you. That goes for uppity blacks who ain't black, too!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • 11
    Posted by LibertyBelle 2 years, 7 months ago
    Well, it reminds me of the comment I heard on the radio from the mouth of former Gov. McAuliffe (of Virginia) recently. Saying parents had no right to tell school board members "what to teach", wasn't it? As a childless spinster, I say, not only parents, but the taxpaying citizens have a right to a voice in what public schools teach children. And who the h--l does he think he is?!!!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 2 years, 7 months ago
    Well what a sweet thing to do! We should all be so blessed. I call this a 'Conflict of Interest'. Ohhh
    we are talking about the dear FBI. Isn't it nice they can be used for personal protection to selected individuals.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 2 years, 7 months ago
    Hmmm, self loathing white people that are drunk on their own Kool-Aid using government muscle to make money while harming the USA by poisoning its youth. Who-da-thunk?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 2 years, 7 months ago
    Xan Tanner - interesting name. Do you know what a xan is? The xan, x, is a monster in NetHack. Xans are capable of flight, and their corpse is poisonous to eat. It has a unique attack that targets your legs, resulting in wounded legs if the attack succeeds.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo