Supreme Court hears election laws case - just not a Trump one

Posted by $ blarman 3 years, 2 months ago to Politics
17 comments | Share | Flag

Pretty telling when one judge's only line of questioning is putting up hypotheticals which have never been used in real life. Kagan is a disgrace and should be removed from SCOTUS. Sotomayor even more so.


All Comments

  • Posted by Dobrien 3 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Barrack Hussein Obama was known as Barry when he was a steam room towel boy trying to earn crack money. When it suited him and the deep state he dropped that nick name.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 3 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The Democrats have decreed that there shall never be another peaceful transfer of power in the US. We should take them at their word. That leaves finding a better country, or making one.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Flootus5 3 years, 2 months ago
    I got about half way through this article before I realized I wasn't reading the Babylon Bee!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 3 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I had the same reaction. I wondered if they threw it in as an afterthought or being mandated by the editor, since it seemed rather out of place.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Eyecu2 3 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The election system is a mockery.

    I was actually ok with the article even if irritated that they have ignored all the other cases that they should have ruled on, until that sentence that freedomforall mentioned. After that I quit reading but of course that was at the very end.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 3 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I assume you are referring to Barry Goldwater. That was before my time so if you'd care to elaborate it would help me understand the context of your remark.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Vegascontrarian 3 years, 2 months ago
    These two ladies typify the 'legacy' of Barry's admin. Gender crap appointments for silence.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ rainman0720 3 years, 2 months ago
    Here's a list of everyone surprised that SCOTUS would hear this case and not any of the others...

    crickets

    Thank you, I'll be here all week. Try the veal.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 3 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You have the option not to read it. My interest was in the case because if the Supreme Court doesn't overturn it, it will effectively give control of Arizona permanently to the Democrats and make a mockery of the election system.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 3 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    For example:
    "Former President Donald Trump refused to concede the election, and instead made repeated, baseless allegations of widespread fraud."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 3 years, 2 months ago
    Why post this left-biased rubbish?
    I got the 'signal'; it's a left-biased lying toilet rag.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo