Who Is Ayn Rand?
I became an Ayn Rand Devotee at the age of 14. I am presently 86.That's a very long time. During that time, I have read, discussed and argued about her, her literature, all of her writings, recorded lectures and the lectures of those she allowed to represent her. In all that time, I have concluded that she had the sharpest mind, and the greatest ability to inspire others with her writings and lectures. But, when it came to one-on-one personal relationships, she was as nutty as a health food candy bar.
You all know the story of Rand and Brandon. If you don't, there's plenty of literature about it or includes it. The tendency of her followers can be illustrated by the Brandon incident in which Brandon was condemned and Rand was given a pass even though they were both committing the same act (s). My point is that while I greatly admire A.R. I refuse to deify her in the way I see many Randoids do. She was a great woman and I hope that some day she'll get the recognition she deserves. But, like most humans, she was neither a saint nor a devil.
Let me insert a little of the Herbie philosophy at this point. As I look back upon my life, I realize that the most important things to me, personally, had less to do with exterior matters, politics, in particular, than interior things, music, art, and my hobby of quantum physics.But standing above all that in a major way, is love.OK, now e gets corny. But I remember love as the most powerful thing in my life, wife, sons, daughters, grandchildren. But not just the people, but the acts of love by them to me and me to them. I saw none of that in Rand. Perhaps someone can illuminate for me that which I missed and am not seeing. It is right and proper to admire A.R. I do. But as a person, she was just..... a person.
You all know the story of Rand and Brandon. If you don't, there's plenty of literature about it or includes it. The tendency of her followers can be illustrated by the Brandon incident in which Brandon was condemned and Rand was given a pass even though they were both committing the same act (s). My point is that while I greatly admire A.R. I refuse to deify her in the way I see many Randoids do. She was a great woman and I hope that some day she'll get the recognition she deserves. But, like most humans, she was neither a saint nor a devil.
Let me insert a little of the Herbie philosophy at this point. As I look back upon my life, I realize that the most important things to me, personally, had less to do with exterior matters, politics, in particular, than interior things, music, art, and my hobby of quantum physics.But standing above all that in a major way, is love.OK, now e gets corny. But I remember love as the most powerful thing in my life, wife, sons, daughters, grandchildren. But not just the people, but the acts of love by them to me and me to them. I saw none of that in Rand. Perhaps someone can illuminate for me that which I missed and am not seeing. It is right and proper to admire A.R. I do. But as a person, she was just..... a person.
“A man's sexual choice is the result and the sum of his fundamental convictions.... He will always be attracted to the woman who reflects his deepest vision of himself, the woman whose surrender permits him to experience a sense of self-esteem.”
I have felt in the past that my love (tank) was full , but then the grandkids came along (4 of them) and I realized the (tank) is a bottomless pit.
Shalom
I am still trying to give her equal value in return.
Peace to you my Brother.
I'm hard-nosed toward anybody accept my kids, for the most part. I spoke with my son last night about helping him transition from being a kid to a man. He's neurologically disabled, otherwise he wouldn't need my help. He's struggling with it. At times...I might seem tough to him. But, he either makes the transition or spends a life of substantial challenge.
Yes. I think women are supposed to drive us crazy. Finally figured that out. Man...our brains are typically very different. Can't live without em, though...
"But, in fact, a person's sexual choice is the result and sum of their fundamental convictions." I think both Dagney and Dominique take this to a poor extreme. The way Dagney can so easily move on from one lover to another when she finds a person of a higher integrity. The way Dominique uses sex and relationships to punish herself. My problem with how these characters act in the books has nothing to do with a sense of right and wrong or any type social norms. I just do not think either of these examples could ever happen in real life. At least after 54 years I have never encountered. How Dagney can give up the attachments in a positive relationship so quickly is just not going to happen in real life. How Dominique can have such a low sense of self esteem and yet be aware of this I just do not think is possible in real life. is this what you mean about her personal relationships?
at all. Please help me clear out the fuzzyness with your intellectual high power hose.
Load more comments...