12

Ron Paul Censored by Google - "YouTube does not allow content that explicitly disputes the efficacy of the World Health Organization.”

Posted by freedomforall 3 years, 7 months ago to Philosophy
37 comments | Share | Flag

"Ironically, just 30 years after the “science” of Marxism-Leninism imploded for all the world to see, we are witnessing a resurgence here in the US of the idea that to question “the science” is not to seek truth or refine understanding of what appears to be conflicting evidence. No, it is to actually wish harm on one’s fellow Americans.

And while we who question “the science” are not being physically carried off to the gulags for disputing the wisdom of our “betters” in the CDC or the World Health Organization, for example, we are finding that the outcome is the same. We are being silenced and accused of malicious intent. The Soviet Communists called dissidents like us “wreckers.”

Last week on my daily news broadcast, the Ron Paul Liberty Report, we reported on two whistleblowers from inside the CDC and Big Pharma who raised serious and legitimate questions about the prevailing coronavirus narrative. The former Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon, has stated that from his experience he believes that nearly 90 percent of the current tests for Covid produce false positives. That means that this massive expansion in “cases,” used to justify continued attacks on our civil liberties, is simply phony.

YouTube, owned by Google, which is firmly embedded into the deep state, was vague in explaining just where we violated their “community standards” by simply reporting on qualified scientists who happen to disagree with the mainstream coronavirus narrative.

But they did offer this shocking explanation in an email sent to us at the Ron Paul Liberty Report: “YouTube does not allow content that explicitly disputes the efficacy of the World Health Organization.”

Incredible!

It’s not the science that is settled. What appears to be “settled is the impulse to silence anyone who asks “why”?"


All Comments

  • Posted by $ Stormi 3 years, 7 months ago
    I do not trust Google, they do not give accurate searches, you have to use other search engines. They just want to track, leading me to leave my phone at home often. The whole left is into WHO, not caring they are as reliable as Google! They are bad, but so is NIAID, CDC and NIH in general, all have money in China, and the lab which ceraed the virus.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Owlsrayne 3 years, 7 months ago
    Facebook is doing the same thing. I maybe stated it already that they took down a post of mine on Messenger recommending to an acquaintance about the efficacy of HCL based on my wife's medical experience (she's an RN for 40yrs). I received a notice that the post didn't meet community guidelines.
    So, basically, Google/YouTube & Facebook refuses to believe anything medical professional has to say. I wonder if their employees listen to their personal medical doctors or maybe those companies refuse to pay for HCL treatment. they need to be investigated to find out how many of their employees have died from COVID 19 related illnesses because they couldn't be treated with HCL.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 3 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Exactly. A buffered form of democracy, with chedks and balances to avoid tyranny. When those get shorted out, it suffers, as now.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 3 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, it was an purposeful exaggeration (and sarcasm), at the present time, but, imo, not an unreasonable expectation for the future.
    I also expect that my life will be shortened as a result of the WHO if I consent to such a mandate.
    I concluded that opting out of SS would mean I could not be productive in my field of work. It is possible, but requires great sacrifices.
    I see no fault in accepting SS payments when people are, in effect, forced to pay for them in advance via taxes.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 3 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And the founders never intended it to be a democracy since they recognized the weaknesses. Thus to the question "what do we have?" Franklin's reply "A republic if we can keep it."
    Even that is not exactly correct.
    Franklin meant a "Republican form" of government, which is night and day different from democracy.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 3 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    imo, he's always gone with the direction of the wind (from the ass of his boss with Wallace's nose firmly embedded therein.) I trust him to try to vilify Trump and make Biden look as good as mentally deficit person can.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 3 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    In order to have a successful democracy the populous must be informed, engaged, moral and responsible...otherwise you get a DemonOcracy or as stated by Plato, I think, "Democracies fail when they become too democratic"...meaning Mob/Minority rules and anything goes.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 3 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think the leftward push on Fox was due to the younger Murdoch, who is extremely liberal in his views. Now that he's resigned over "differences of opinion," I wonder if those now in charge will figure out they are in danger of losing their audience to Newsmax because of the leftward tilt.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by lrshultis 3 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Positioning doesn't matter much for the spelling for reading. Mostly, just the first and last letters must be right. the rest of the letters can be scrambled.
    For example:
    "Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn’t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 3 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It's just three excited male unicornowletihoopeti hominids as crazy as horny bucks can act during mating season.
    The big one will kill the smaller two should all three smell but one female in heat at the same time.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by lrshultis 3 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Isn't that a bit of an over statement? Did WHO actually mandate a poison vaccine to you? The influenza vaccines save large numbers of people from death and other affects from influenza. In the USA, even with vaccines, 30 to 60 thousand die each flu season. Without a vaccine over 200000 have died so far from SARS-CoV-2 related illness.
    As for bad colds, there are about 150 different viruses, none of which have a vaccine, though each cold that one gets is most likely from a different virus. Of those viruses, there are 4 or 5 corona viruses included.
    What do you mean by your short life?
    I am 80 and do not worry about my short life. I just live day by day doing what I choose to do. No more bothering from customers from the one person service business that I had while squirreled away from supporting large taxes to help out with all those great government programs. I do collect $665 a month in SS payments. I take it because I tried opting out of SS back in the 60s but was told to pay up or go to jail.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by amhunt 3 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Google has steadily moved from excellent to outright thuggery. I refer to them as googlops and like you, now have zero respect for them.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 3 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You are correct, remember whats her name was the same, which means he will be changing networks soon after...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 3 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I don't entirely trust Chris Wallace, as lately he's obviously tried to show that underneath he's just as "woke" as those on the left. I'll reserve judgement until I watch the debate tonight, to see if he tries to be equally as hard on Biden as the President. I'm kind of surprised the Biden campaign hasn't cried foul, as Trump has already withstood a Wallace interview, with no punches pulled, and is more familiar with his style.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 3 years, 7 months ago
    I've come to believe that this reflects the Democrat view of "democracy" applied universally: majority rules, even applied to science; general agreement becomes absolute consensus, by decree. The exception is when the majority do not agree with them, and they then malign the disbelievers as ignorant deplorables.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 3 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It is weird they allowed a Fox person to do it, last time it was whats her face, who immediately imploded afterwards, their survival rate post debate is 0.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ycandrea 3 years, 7 months ago
    In other words, like climate change, there really is no science behind it.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo