We also need to get a lot of thumbs up for this post so that it gets sent to everyone.

I am going to change the heading to insure that it does...we need everyone's participation.

Agreed.

Hmm, I obviously did the same thing...am I next?

What the heck did you do, nothing I've seen that would cause you to be shadow baned.

I like that: Admining...LMAO

BTW, ewv gets no say in anything, he does not get to determine a price to pay for no crime other that finally reaching an end with his Ayn Rand pontifications and repeated arrogant statements about individuals and their positions.

I had this discussion years ago with Scott, when ewv and the other two (I can'tt remember their names) started the harrasment program of "Your not Objective enough". I called Scott to tell him I was quitting, and pulling out, and he convinced me then to stay and stand up. I have had numerous clashed with ewv, and have had to walk away when he was exceeding my obnoxiousness threshold, but Dan was justified in his response. There are other platforms coming online now, that seem to be being run by patriot oriented people who will allow free speech, with common courtesy limits. Time to start looking and evaluating. I have sent my own input to Scott (if he is even admining this anymore).

Hmm, seems the complainant has deleted his comments...ewe should be part of this conversation.

Still no comments by admin, someone else needed for this conversation.

I would ask all, to send admin a note then share your thoughts on this subject and support or not, a reprieve or commutation of Dan/ Dobrien's acceptance back into the Gulch.
I think John Galt would be in support of Dan seeing that he is a valued Creator.

Lots of downvoting and it hasn't caused banning.
Behavior does and I am trying to have a discussion on where should we draw the line...demeaning someone, calling them stupid, swearing or telling them where to go?

I don't think telling someone where to go crosses that line...It's not demeaning, it's just another way of saying...go away you bother me, kind of funny if you think about it.

Yes, we want civil discourse but we all should know when to quit when our message isn't getting across...sometimes it's the messenger or the message and sometimes it's the respondent,

I am not asking for an immediate response from you, I am just asking all of us to think about that.
We welcome free expression, so where should we reasonably draw the line.

And that type of person must be those that designed, enforce and control this site...because people couldn't down vote if it wasn't part of the program.

Laughing, the mad downvoter is at it again!
...as if it really makes a difference...

I guess that's the "Real Go to Hell" in 2020
Must be a Post Modernist...

MEMES UP!

Hmm, a non specific place, are we free to make that assumption?

Ewe just told Blarman to go somewhere else.
Do you think he ment a “fictional” place like hell.
If I could I would flag his comment like he did to me.

I am going to try to email admin with a link to this post.
Let ya know if that's possible.

It went!...asked them to chime in on this discussion as well.