The Dayton shooter........
Well well the kettle is calling the pot black.
This all leaves very little question about who Betts really was. He was absolutely a far leftist. He was not a white supremacist and hated religious people. He repeated antifa, as well as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez talking points on his social media. He was a global warming enthusiast and an avowed socialist. Every piece of evidence we have points to his radicalization coming via the left, not the right.
This all leaves very little question about who Betts really was. He was absolutely a far leftist. He was not a white supremacist and hated religious people. He repeated antifa, as well as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez talking points on his social media. He was a global warming enthusiast and an avowed socialist. Every piece of evidence we have points to his radicalization coming via the left, not the right.
As Jaynes explains, mankind at one point, was schizophrenic in nature...until the voice went away and we (some of us) re-awakened to the voice of self.
But again, to your point, I think a rational, fully integrated man may have the same questions but approach the problem differently.
Many scientist, investigating their chosen subjects think that there is no way all that we see and think we know already could not have come to be all by itself nor just randomly happen where everything just falls into place...there must be causation but unlike Religion, (organization of some information), the scientist will continue to look for causation without developing rituals in it's honor but still appreciate one's own existence and whatever cause might be responsible in the big picture without the need to humanize it.
From the article......But here's how California public schools want to define capitalism:
Capitalism- an economic and political system in which industry and trade are based on a “free market” and largely controlled by private companies instead of the government. Within Ethnic Studies, scholars are often very critical of the system of capitalism as research has shown that Native people and people of color are disproportionately exploited within the system. In a capitalist economy, surplus value (profit) is generated from human labor and everything is commodified.
Well, so much for prosperity! Let's just return to big government command-and-control economies. That worked out so well for the Soviet Union, right?
But it gets better, and, by "better," I mean so much worse. Ethnic Studies would also oppose anthropocentrism.
Anthropocentrism- the belief that human beings are the most important entity or species in the universe or human-centeredness.
So, the fact that only human beings have developed civilization, advanced technology, culture, art, history ... that's all irrelevant. No, humans are inherently oppressive if we don't take into consideration the rights of animals, or something. Note: this is not saying humans should treat animals nicely — it is saying that the idea of humans as unique and uniquely deserving of rights is fundamentally bigoted and oppressive.
https://www.teaparty.org/confirmed-de...
Is MSNBC going to cover that?
https://pjmedia.com/trending/liberal-...
Dayton shooter Connor Betts may be antifa’s first mass killer
https://nypost.com/2019/08/06/dayton-...
The worst offenses against compassionate human behavior come not from the Koran, but from the Hadiths, which are supposedly based on informal conversations with the Prophet. Some reformist Muslim scholars think the Hadiths were assembled to win over those Arabs who wanted to cling to some of their pagan practices, and should be regarded as less binding than the Koran to the faithful.
To cling blindly to religious texts, or the interpretations expressed by rigid ideologues is unworthy of a species with a mind as capable of rational thought as we are. Righteously spouting scripture, or political statements based on it, is a weakness, when we are fully capable of deciding what is right and wrong when we consider all aspects of a situation. That is not a support of conditional morality that progressives are so fond of, but of the human mind to recognize all aspects of a situation without reliance on racial, cultural, or religious differences. Omar is very guilty of using her religious upbringing, with all of the antisemitism inherent to justify her defiant, abusive behavior. White supremacists are very fond of selecting biblical statements as justification for their violent behavior as well. Both of those tendencies are definitely pathological.
Sure, some use alcohol and drugs to cover for some deep hurt but again, it was one's genetic pronality that made it an acceptable option.
I can definitely say that a psychopath and a Sociopath have a dysfunction that prevents the left and right brain from cooperating. They usually use only one side or the other.
My insight is that one needs the cooperation of both sides in order to have a conscience.
Sociopaths may be a bit different in the aspect of brain wiring where pleasure is derived by harming others regardless of whether they are aware of right or wrong, good or evil. They may only have a weak or sporadic connection but a psychopath has none.
Also, Narcissism is always present in a sociopath whereas it is not always present with psychopaths.
The commonality is a lack of empathy...putting themselves in the shoes of others.
Both however, suffer from a lack of identity, the "I" or the Mind and often make one up. Freud called it the Superego...he didn't know about the Mind, he only studied the mentally ill.
PS...I am beginning to wonder if Omar is a sociopath aided by a religion that makes it acceptable.
Got your digital pony express and one from Herb7734. For all who interacted with Herb , a tremendous asset and participant on this Galt’s gulch he is doing better after a few difficult health issues. Sadly, his posting days will be limited in the future. Send well wishes in a Private Message.
He will get it , but he may not respond.
Shalom to Q
I break down the acts of evil by humans as a lack of conscience...and I don't think it's a choice. We Can't fix it, we have politically looked the other way instead of really studying the issue in a logical way.
I will be happy to check out your post, thanks for the heads up, Doc.
The answer is that "good" and "evil" are learned value judgements. Genocide has been portrayed as a truly evil act, but in the view of the ones committing the genocidal acts they often feel they're protecting themselves and others of their kind from racial impurity, revenge, social destruction, or some other such justification, and see it as a necessary thing, good for their group.
For the sociopath, whether genetically predisposed, or created by the abuse of others, there is no good or evil. Their value system is based on what pleases or displeases them. There are some sociopaths who are less dangerous, getting their pleasure out of tormenting others with mental or emotional abuse, but empathy is totally lacking. They consider themselves more intelligent than their victims, and disregard the idea they themselves could be victims. One such person I asked about the concept of becoming a victim just shrugged, and said "If it happens, it happens."
I'd be curious to see what OldUglyCarl has to say about sociopaths, given his close encounters with the breed over many years.
The Evil Hag was predisposed to evil. I would think she abused animals early in life. Likely much to the pleasure of her gangster father.
Load more comments...