Mueller's perversion

Posted by LarryHeart 5 years, 11 months ago to Government
44 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

According to Giuliani Mueller perverted justice by saying he could not exonerate the President. If the Sitting President can not be charged by the Justice Dept, then he cannot be exonerated by the justice Dept from a case that cannot be presented.
But... the Office of Legal Council guidance (e.g. not mandatory) of 2000 says a sitting president SHOULD NOT be charged. It does not say cannot and in fact a few months later Clinton was charged.

If there was any evidence of Obstruction Mueller would have made a case. You can bet on it. Since there wasn't he took this route to keep the pressure on the President without alienating the Democrats who will be his clients or in some way reward him.
This statement he made to day is geared to push impeachment and to keep himself from having to tell Congress when he knew the President was not guilty of collusion and other questions that would show that this "Investigation" was corrupt from the beginning and merely an attempt to unseat the President..
The result is that President Trump has goaded the swamp creatures and the deep state actors to show themselves to the Nation.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by ycandrea 5 years, 11 months ago
    I hope a real investigation will nail Mueller to the wall. He needs to go to jail for all the harm he did to innocent people. Our Constitution is supposed to protect us from an oppressive government.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 5 years, 11 months ago
    As far as I am concerned, you are guilty as charged, or you are not guilty. The whole use of the word "innocent" is not really useful, as NOT having done something is impossible to prove

    So if Stupid Mueller cant prove Trump did anything wrong after 40 million and 2 years, its time to just give that up. As to "obstruction", I am not so sure that I even agree that should be a a real crime. Isnt using the 5th amendment a form of obstruction? Whats the difference between taking the 5th and destroying your personal documents that could incrimminate you.

    Mueller and the dems just wanted to use the legal system to GET Trump. Just like the government is trying to GET Assange in any way they can.

    If the dems want investigations, let them deal with the weaponization of the DOJ that THEY have done.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 5 years, 11 months ago
    The Democrats want the trappings and atmosphere of an impeachment without actually having to conduct such a hearing. Even after Mule-ears' pathetic, desperate last swipe at the President, Pelosi essentially said there's no there there to justify impeachment. Even pencil neck Schiff is now saying they don't have justification for impeachment, leaving Nadler alone in implying that he could call for an impeachment inquiry.

    There's trouble brewing in River City for the Democrats. They've made the mistake of letting impeachment fever run wild in their base, and the socialists among the new representatives are madly screeching to have the President run out of town, tarred and feathered. If they unleash all that fury, they run a risk that their own new moderates from Trump-leaning districts will have to vote against impeachment in hope of surviving the 2020 elections.

    A failed impeachment vote in the House will split the party between the radicals and the moderates, and guarantee the House flips back to Republican control in 2020. It's a fine mess they've gotten themselves into.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 5 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Oh, yeah, overlooked those sorry slugs.
    Recall shortly before The Donald was elected, me dino heard Rush Limbaugh admit to being recently enlightened about the GOP and further state that some Republicans in Congress "would vote for Hillary to protect their fiefdoms."
    Do believe that was before Rush ever used the term, RINO
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 5 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    +1 don't get me wrong.
    All the Jackass Party and Fake News have been 24/7 doing all that since the day The Donald and Melania came down that iconic escalator.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • -2
    Posted by $ FredTheViking 5 years, 11 months ago
    I understand the Mueller investigation was a "fishing" exercise much in the same way the Bill Clinton investigation was as well. Guess what? The investigation did find evidence for obstruction of justice and since the president cannot charge himself with a crime it lies with Congress to do so. I would argue it is appropriate for Congress to proceed with an impeachment inquiry and it would make sense to try him in the Senate. Now the president can have his day in the court of the Senate and attempt to explain his actions. In all likelihood, it will prove that politics will rule the day and the vote will be along party lines. The best outcome is for trump to be removed and the criminally charged.

    Now, what about the fact this process to hold the president accountable is flawed and has historically only be used for political reasons. I understand this why many you oppose Trump's impeachment. However, you need to understand there is no other way to keep the president accountable and the only reason why the Democrats won't move forward yet is because of the politics but this just not a good way of looking at this situation. Forget about the politics and your own political motivations for a second. Mueller, who is the chief investigator, just told told Congress needs to charge the president with a crime, he can't do it. Mueller maybe an asshole but it doesn't mean he is wrong. Congress job is to keep the president honest. The process maybe flawed but there is no alternative to holding the president to accountable. I would argue we should honor the process and hold the president accountable. Even if it is problematic. At the same time we should look to reform government in a way that president can be held accountable but without the politics. There might even need to be a change to the constitution.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by BCRinFremont 5 years, 11 months ago
    The swamp rats and other creatures of the dark are now trapped in a cage with a tiger that they awoke a couple of years ago. May they squeak away as they are eaten! Squeak, squeak, squeak, you evil, duplicitous, devilish, selfish and insane creeps!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by evlwhtguy 5 years, 11 months ago
    Basically Muller publicly slandered the President. The swamp couldn't find anything and still cant get over the lost election so this is what they are reduced to. Spitting on the rule of law and slander.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 5 years, 11 months ago
    It's about time that the media picked up that the continuing Dem distortions, witch hunt and impeachment talk is the INSURANCE POLICY that Struck was talking about.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Arthgallo 5 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    nope. He knew exactly what he said and he meant to say it that way because that is what the Dem's wanted to hear. Would it not be more plausible that the "deep state" directed him to make this statement and then get off the stage? There's a lot of money involved!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 5 years, 11 months ago
    I did wonder why it cost so much money to do this investigation? It seems to me we didn't even get kissed!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 5 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    A person is innocent until proven guilty. Therefore the President needs no exoneration by Mule-er. That Mule-whore couldn't exonerate the President is nonsense. The president is ALREADY Exonerated unless proven guilty. Even if Indicted and impeached the president is innocent until PROVEN guilty.
    That exoneration statement is just New Speak for the Demo-craps to lie and desperately try to keep their enormous salary and benefits. What a waste of our money, labor, assets and life.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Your_Name_Goes_Here 5 years, 11 months ago
    “It would be unfair to accuse someone of a crime when there could be no court resolution of the charge,” Mueller said. “We concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.” And with that, Robert Mueller taints the President and invites the House of Representatives to move forward with their "remedy". George Orwell is spinning in his grave as we speak. Doublethink was what he called it, and that's precisely what we heard this morning.

    I was hopeful that Mueller would take this moment to chastise those who were attempting to use the work of his office as a political weapon, and to ask the country to move forward and begin to heal its divisions. But instead, he squandered this opportunity and revealed himself to be yet another political hack.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by exceller 5 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "Therefore, Mueller is a subordinate of Barr. Mueller has no business making an independent statement. Especially one that seems to contradict his boss. "

    It was done by Comey before regarding Lynch, and once there is a precedence the left incorporates it in their arsenal.

    Mueller fueled the left in Congress and I expect an increased hysteria for impeachment.

    Unless AG Barr puts an end to it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 5 years, 11 months ago
    Distortion of language is the weapon of Politicians to misdirect and confuse the public.
    Contrary to Ken Starr, Mueller was a "special" prosecutor, not an "Independent" prosecutor. Therefore, Mueller is a subordinate of Barr. Mueller has no business making an independent statement. Especially one that seems to contradict his boss.
    As with the Cold War, the Russians once again WIN. Russian propaganda and money since the 60's created and/or inflated divisions in the country between the Rich and poor, men and women, religious and non, Democrat vs Republican to the point of losing friendship and communication. Media and Universities are further disseminating the Russian leftist propaganda. Who benefits? The Political parties and the deep state government. Divided we fall. Fall to whom? Political parties who control the government. The onluy solution is to control the government. How? Read this www.TheSocietytProject.org
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 5 years, 11 months ago
    Do you think perhaps he meant he didn't have the power to 'exonerate' the president and thought this statement would be cute?
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo