"Intent" or "Letter"
Posted by CrustyOldGeezer 4 years, 11 months ago to Government
The INTENT of the traffic laws are PUBLIC SAFETY.
The LETTER of the law, which judges claim are the deciding factor are WRITTEN BY POLITICIANS as REVENUE GENERATING tools.
Logically, the INTENT would be the SUPERIOR of the two.
HOWEVER, the Constitution Guarantees an IMPARTIAL JUDGE.
When the 'judge' ASSUMES THE STATES POSITION, he/she is NO LONGER IMPARTIAL, but merely a COLLECTION AGENT for the government.
AND THAT IS ILLEGAL! and should be pointed out in the court records.
I'm waiting for the time, if and when, I end up in front of a judge with that attitude of THE LETTER OF THE LAW takes precedence so I can ask if that holds True for the Second Amendment as well.
Either he says "YES" which amount to his INVALIDATING EVERY GUN CONTROL LAW ON THE BOOKS, and "NO" invalidates everything he just said in the case at hand.
Such a conundrum they would have to deal with.
The LETTER of the law, which judges claim are the deciding factor are WRITTEN BY POLITICIANS as REVENUE GENERATING tools.
Logically, the INTENT would be the SUPERIOR of the two.
HOWEVER, the Constitution Guarantees an IMPARTIAL JUDGE.
When the 'judge' ASSUMES THE STATES POSITION, he/she is NO LONGER IMPARTIAL, but merely a COLLECTION AGENT for the government.
AND THAT IS ILLEGAL! and should be pointed out in the court records.
I'm waiting for the time, if and when, I end up in front of a judge with that attitude of THE LETTER OF THE LAW takes precedence so I can ask if that holds True for the Second Amendment as well.
Either he says "YES" which amount to his INVALIDATING EVERY GUN CONTROL LAW ON THE BOOKS, and "NO" invalidates everything he just said in the case at hand.
Such a conundrum they would have to deal with.
In short the judge would refuse to answer.
The speed limit in front of my house is 30 mph. The gov't did a speed study and found the average speed is 44mph. The only response is the occasional speed trap, which drivers treat as a random peril like needing to repair a tire. The gov't could save money by setting a hard limit of 45 mph and having the machine mail you a ticket if it sees you going 46 mph or faster.
I don't immediately see the connection between this and gun rights.