Here’s The Truth About the Jewish Settlement in the Holy Land

Posted by $ Olduglycarl 4 years, 11 months ago to History
35 comments | Share | Flag

A piece of history I wasn't aware of.
Since the big hoop de do from the muslims in congress, I thought it wise to know the truth.

On must always consider: Muslims are taught to lie...

Jewish settlement in the Holy Land predates the Holocaust, and the land was acquired lawfully from the owners, whether under Ottoman or British rule. To imply that Palestinian Arabs greeted Jews with open arms, instead of attempting to push Jews into the sea in the 1948 war, is a gross historical distortion.
SOURCE URL: http://truedaily.news/2019/05/16/heres-the-truth-about-jewish-settlement-in-the-holy-land/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 11 months ago
    Where is the evidence they bought 5 million acres?
    Clear ties, certainly. Many Americans have an equally good claim of clear ties from their ancestors.
    American Indians have clear ties to most of North America, too.
    Do the Arabs also have clear ties to the land that Israel occupies? Do Italians have rights if Rome once ruled there?
    Without actual evidence of ownership, I see this as a case of might makes right.
    The con-gresswoman is just an ignorant savage, imo.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 4 years, 11 months ago
      The documentation of the purchases...did a search, not one rebuttal to the statement.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_...

      The indians is another story. In the Northeast our forefathers convinced the local tribes to be a part of the American experiment but during our expansion and by Andy Jackson...that intention, as you know, went out the window.

      We also must realize that...this was the paradigm of those times and The indians probably took lands from the giants that inhabited North America too...it's not like they established a country like the Jews did in 1000 BC and continued interest in the land for all that time right up to now.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ blarman 4 years, 11 months ago
        It should also be noted that not only did the Native American Indians "control" of the land fluctuate depending on which warring tribe was dominant at the time, they didn't have the same concept of land ownership as the rest of the world. Most of the plains tribes were nomadic and moved all over - calling the midwest their "land" would have been as inaccurate as it would have been foreign a concept to them.

        Ownership of land has always been about the control and use of that land. We think we're more civilized in today's day and age because we _ for the most part - record and honor property rights. But most civilizations in history have had neither respect for private property rights nor the tracking of those rights as part of their civilizational infrastructure. To compare our modern civilization with theirs is a gross injustice.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 4 years, 11 months ago
          And that is why the indians never created nor produce value, never made day to day living easier or more pleasant and never expanded their thinking into the mind.
          Their and other civilizations of the world disinterest in the ownership of property is specifically why we could never have open borders nor a one world civilization nor government.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ 25n56il4 4 years, 11 months ago
            Now listen, someone is going to make me lose my temper. The State of Texas stole my grandmother's land! She was an American Indian. She fought in the courts for years but to no avail. After all, she was 'just an Indian'.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by $ 4 years, 11 months ago
              You can thank the father of the demoncrapic party, andy jackson, for that and everyone that was made in his image.
              That would have never happened if every state and president following our forefathers example would of invited the indians to join the American Experiment.
              The property thing could have been worked out amiably if they felt a part of the new country.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by $ blarman 4 years, 11 months ago
                Correct. Jackson was also the impetus behind the destruction of the Seminole and other tribes in Florida. The "Trail of Tears" wasn't an aberration under Jackson. He was a racist through and through.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by BCRinFremont 4 years, 11 months ago
        The Jewish armies were fairly brutal in their acquisition of The Promised Land, but take it they did, a couple thousand years before Islam existed.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 4 years, 11 months ago
          Another story confounded. The Jews didn't really destroy them in total. They were very sick people with all kinds of genetic diseases due to inbreeding
          Among them were Nephilim and Neanderthal remnants and many were just taken as servants...which meant they were taken care of in exchange for serving the Jews.

          This was brought to light during an archeological dig in the Canaan area where they found neanderthals berried with Humans...of course no one is allowed to tell or show anything related to the Nephilim bones found.
          Even the Jews speak not of the Nephilim much.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by BCRinFremont 4 years, 11 months ago
          Does the original claim to the land belong to the Hittites or the Canaanites or the Moabites or even the Babylonians? My guess is that the genetics of all these early peoples is pretty much the same. Do the different religions, gods, and ways of life somehow have a claim on the land???
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 11 months ago
        Thanks for the research. That shows that they owned about 200,000 acres and Israel consists of about 5,000,000 acres.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by Lucky 4 years, 11 months ago
          Much land was desert, swamp and marsh, not on the market, not marketable, not owned.
          Ten Arab nations evicted Jewish populations (almost one million people) of long standing, who owned land some four times the area of the current state of Israel.
          ( Not all were evicted, some were sold, this may not be a criticism to those who can excuse slavery).

          When the British split the land of the Palestine mandate, 77 percent went to Jordan.
          (Transjordan, a new nation with British ally King Abdullah who was murdered by the usual for suggesting a peace agreement).
          In Israel, property rights including land ownership are respected. The national parliament is on land owned by the Greek Church.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by exceller 4 years, 11 months ago
      "The con-gresswoman is just an ignorant savage, imo. "

      Yes, she is. But that does not mean the Dems don't embrace her along with Omar and Cortex.

      They are useful idiots who serve the purpose, at least for the time being. When they are no longer useful, they'll be thrown under the bus.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 4 years, 11 months ago
    And don't forget the damn British keeping the 'Star of David' from docking until Americans started to raise the devil! They were dying on that ship, after their ordeal with the Holocaust! We know the Muslims are liars. That's why they shouldn't be allowed to immigrate to the U.S. What have they ever contributed but complaints about our way of life"
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 4 years, 11 months ago
    The Jews, the Israelite's have clear ties to the lands of Israel, clear ties to Jerusalem and those ties predate the Roman Empire by at least 200 years.

    There never was a city, state or country of Palestine...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 4 years, 11 months ago
    What gave the British an excuse for supporting the idea of a Jewish state was the creation of a method for industrial production of acetone by Chaim Weizmann in 1916. The UK was desperately short of enough acetone to support the war effort (used to make cordite, a key element of smokeless gunpowder), and agreed to favor what would become the state of Israel in exchange for the process.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by mminnick 4 years, 11 months ago
    One of the first things the Zionist movement did was to establish a fund to buy the land in Palestine (Israel). It had be seized from them at various times by various empires and they knew the feelings of loosing land that way. A lot was purchased through 3rd parties and "dummy corporations" but it was all bought legally.
    After the British took it over as a "Protectorate" the Jewish purchase of land was slowed by not stopped. Further more there has always been a Jewish population in Palestine.
    A second point. In the war for Jewish independence in 1948 the leaders of the new Jewish state begged the Palestinians not to leave but remain in the country as rightful occupants of their land and homes. some did, most left as the other Arab countries demanded. The departing were told basically, "If you leave, you can't return. We want you to stay. Leave if you must but remember You can't return"
    Most that left thought the Jews would be annihilated and they could return at that point. Didn't work that way so we have a voluntarily displaced people demanding tey be allowed to return and get their old property back. This is just not going to happen as long as there is a Jewish state.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Owlsrayne 4 years, 11 months ago
    I would like to see some sort of censure of those two Muslim representatives for their anti-semitism and there attempt to rewrite history. They are so biased it makes me very upset at their illiteracy. They probably subscribe to Palestinian online newspaper and read the revised Koran authored by the Mula's of Iran. These representatives have no understanding of American history. I don't understand how they became citizens.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo