Climate Change Gets a scientific stake through the heart
This paper defines the real controller of climate change: Low Cloud Cover. It also says that Greenhouse gases combined may increase overall temperature increase by .1 degree C. This is way beyond the "Clamate change" models, and basically puts to bed the "Greenhouse Gas" theory and models. Whats more interesting the science was peer reviewed and published.
As we can see there is no room for the contribution of greenhousegases i.e. anthropogenic forcing within this experimental accuracy. Even thoughthe monthly temperature anomaly is very noisy it is easy to notice a couple ofdecreasing periods in the increasing trend of the temperature. This behavior cannotbe explained by the monotonically increasing concentration of CO2and it seems tobe far beyond the accuracy of the climate models."
So, when the cap and tarde commies come calling in your state, as they did in Oregon, we have proof, they are just on their usual looting spree. It also backs up The Trump Admin position. There are other factors not in the paper that fully explain the current changes without any greehouse gases, such as Solar energy, cosmic ray nucleation and electro atmospheric dynamics, that are still being investigated and should soon have enough data to build an accurate model.
As we can see there is no room for the contribution of greenhousegases i.e. anthropogenic forcing within this experimental accuracy. Even thoughthe monthly temperature anomaly is very noisy it is easy to notice a couple ofdecreasing periods in the increasing trend of the temperature. This behavior cannotbe explained by the monotonically increasing concentration of CO2and it seems tobe far beyond the accuracy of the climate models."
So, when the cap and tarde commies come calling in your state, as they did in Oregon, we have proof, they are just on their usual looting spree. It also backs up The Trump Admin position. There are other factors not in the paper that fully explain the current changes without any greehouse gases, such as Solar energy, cosmic ray nucleation and electro atmospheric dynamics, that are still being investigated and should soon have enough data to build an accurate model.
Didn't we learn in third grade that plants need Carbon Dioxide to live? What's all the bullshit about the Carbon Footprint? Do you want the plants to rebel and kick your ass? LOL
I missed it when you first posted it, among all the other issues on the Gulch.
This is the level the climate change subject should be discussed but I doubt it'll reach those who need it most: the "consensus" crowd.
Climate Change is a dogma for the left, a new means of control. They will not give it up lightly.
Link: http://www.drroyspencer.com/2019/07/r...
Maybe someome here has more climate religion to impose on this science?
But here is what we are dealing with: We have 4 types of people: Unicameral Conscious Humans, Bicameral humans, (meaning use of both sides but not at the same time.), those left brain only and those right brain only or at least predominately. The latter two present real problems in society, they tend to be leftest and many, if not one trick ponies, are parasitical in nature, add in Hubris and you got real problems...think the Global Delete. (No Conscience).
Those of us that are balanced, unicameral, seem to be the most integrated, mindful and with a strong conscience.
"Hey, the world will end in 12 years unless we bankrupt it first."
Maybe it’s a Möbius loop.
Noel Brown, of the UN Environmental Program(me), told AP that the world should expect coastal flooding and crop failures. He gave the world ten years to fix the problem, and then, he said, the world would be beyond all help.
https://www.apnews.com/bd45c372caf118...
First, does that sound familiar? It should. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) also gave the world ten years--or was it twelve?
Second, we're not nearly at that point. Now the sun has dimmed, slightly but significantly. Look for milder summers and harsher winters.
And while I'm on the subject, I suggest we tell the cap-and-trade looters that they daren't ask us to ante up just because the French were foolish enough never to air-condition their schools and offices, and now reap the whirlwind.
Here is some more details:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYoOc...
Some statements from it:
(1) USE 'PARTICLE FORCING' AND EXPAND SOLAR DATA TO INCLUDE X-RAYS, SOLAR WIND, AND HIGH-ENERGY PROTONS.
(2) CEASE OF DECEPTIVE PRACTICES LIKE ONLY SHOWING SPRING SNOW COVER, AND NOT 'COUNTING' SOLAR PHYSICISTS AS 'CLIMATE SCIENTISTS' IN THEIR "97%" ANALYSIS.
(3) STOP PRETENDING CLIMATE CHANGE BEGAN IN 1850, THERE IS ROBUST DATA GOING WELL INTO THE PAST.
Climate Change Gets Another scientific stake through the heart.
This is not a new idea but this paper is especially workmanlike in quantification.
A figure of 0.1degreeC increase for doubling of CO2 is not a climate disaster, probably not measurable in any practical sense, tho' the same could be said about 3degreesC.
Yes cloud cover is crucial. Cloud formation depends on ionization which depends on solar activity.
Load more comments...