His point about no attention being paid to terrorist acts against Christians making major news is telling. Not only were 20 Christians killed in the Philippines by Moro Muslim terrorists, but 120 Nigerian Christians were slaughtered by Muslim terrorists just a day before the Mosque attacks in New Zealand, yet not a ripple ran through the MSM about those.

There is an unquestionable agenda being played by secular globalists, and it's an exercise in insanity. They hate the Judaeo-Christian religions for being the cornerstone of Western morality, and foolishly see Islam as a crude tool to create a religious war that will destroy Western faith and culture. Like other elitists before them, they are so arrogant they think the power of Islam can be swept aside once its usefulness is done. Islamic empire has more than once been the impending fate of the world, and the faithful will not casually step aside for faithless infidels like the globalists who think they are the masters of fate.

I've done much religious study in my lifetime, and what has given the secular globalists their delusion is the collapse of Western faiths, victims of non-stop assault on their principles and morality. They make the serious error of convincing themselves they can likewise smother the force of the Ummah (Muslim faithful) when it's convenient. Islam may not currently be united, or have a powerful religious leader, but the desire to conquer the world on behalf of the Prophet is strong, and efforts to make them heel as a dog of the infidels will be a trigger to unleash uncontrollable forces that will destroy the globalist elitist culture.

The statement, "Among the truths was that Anglo-Saxon culture and people are being slowly exterminated by their own hand..." made me take notice and make a connection. That is, while on the treadmill this morning I was watching the news and the unwelcome latest antics of ROBERT FRANCIS "Beto" O'Rourke burned up a piece of my lifespan. He can be the poster child of the statement I quoted above. He is a brainwashed self-loathing white male American of Irish descent who has been thoroughly deceived into accepting some false guilt of being born such and is now deceiving others into his own psychosis. His self-deceit begins with the adoption of "Beto" as a name where he throws his own heritage under the bus and tries to make us all believe he is not who he is. I am an American of Scots-Irish descent and I find his self-hating posturing antics despicable to say the least!

Thanks for finding this and sharing, nickursis. The author is spot on.

Even towards the end where he mentions Newt. I normally like Newt, but the Venezuelans created their hell when they voted in Chavez and deserve to stew in it or extricate themselves. No need to spill American blood there.

This isn't just selective listening it is selective talking. I don't know where it will end and people decide to be free again. Then when you look at examples such as Russia, China, Cambodia, Venezuela you realize that people can die by the millions at the hand of their government and never give up trying to make slavery work for the benefit of mankind.

I know this is WAY off subject. I have not been able to find mention of it anywhere even using various search processes.
The tv show Madam Secretary last night was about a small island country that was sunk into the ocean by a typhoon. And how it was ALL about global warming. Dialog was directly from media global warming warmongers. I can understand some innuendo but this was over the top. I understand this is a politically themed show BUT this was outrageous.....anybody?

“There is no reason for a producer today to produce.”

I disagree – but we are getting there for many of the reasons stated.

"If we start asking too many questions about whether mass-murder is ever excusable we wind up in some pretty nasty places -- and thus we can't have that discussion and must bury both printed word and live video.

I put out as Exhibit "A" of our national insanity Newt Gingrich who just yesterday put forward the statement that our military should remove Maduro, in a sovereign land, and in an operation that will inevitably involve mass-murder with a body count higher than what just happened in Christchurch.

Never mind that William Barr, our AG, just said the threat of political and religious violence is real and we must remain vigilant against it. Does he intend to indict -- or at least rebuke -- Newt? Or is his statement of contempt and vigilance only apply to the times when he likes the targets of said political and religious violence?"

While I agree with most of what is written, I take exception with the part quoted above.

First off, Maduro was not elected democratically, that is well known. Unseating him would be justified since he'll not leave on his own recognizance. I doubt there would be mass murder as a consequence.

On Barr, why should he attack Newt? Newt came up with a solution against the do-nothing mantra of Congress.

Let's just wait and see what he does as the newly minted AG.