Another Constitutional Win!

Posted by Thoritsu 5 years ago to Legislation

US District Judge orders CA not to enforce magazine limits, and directs the AG (Becerra) to provide proof that such a notice has been communicated.
Good news for 2nd Amendment Freedom!

Could be a precedent affecting other state foolishness.

SOURCE URL: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.casd.533515/gov.uscourts.casd.533515.87.0_1.pdf

Add Comment

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

6

Posted by 25n56il4 5 years ago

Well they are trying hard. Colorado is crazy! I like the idea of making 'Sanctuary 2nd Amendment counties or states.'

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink
- 2
  
  Posted by Thoritsu 5 years ago
  
  That is a great idea!
  
  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink

4

Posted by Roland_Porter 5 years ago

Huge fan of firearms. I actually jumped for joy when I saw this. Gives me hope that freedom can win the day.

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink
- 1
  
  Posted by Thoritsu 5 years ago
  
  Too bad it has to come from the justice dept
  
  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
  - 2
    
    Posted by Temlakos 5 years ago
    
    Not the U.S. Department of Justice--but from a U.S. District Court. A federal court.
    
    Which Court found that law wrong on a multitude of levels. Chief among them: that it contradicts the Second Amendment and relevant case law (DC v. Heller, among other cases).
    
    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
    - 3
      
      Posted by bobsprinkle 5 years ago
      
      I will not feel safe with the federal courts until at least there are no more sanctuary states/cities!!
      
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
      - 2
        
        Posted by Thoritsu 5 years ago
        
        Yeah, it can still come apart. Just have to communicate the slivers of good news.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
    - 2
      
      Posted by Thoritsu 5 years ago
      
      I meant the Judicial Branch, sorry.
      
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
      - 2
        
        Posted by Temlakos 5 years ago
        
        That's quite all right. It was a pleasure to read the opinion, which I had to do to respond properly.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink

3

Posted by ArtIficiarius 5 years ago

SO MOTE IT BE!

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink

2

Posted by LibertyBelle 5 years ago

HALLELUJAH!!!!!

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink

2

Posted by mccannon01 5 years ago

Excellent news!! Now, if only NY could be slapped by the Constitution!

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink
- 3
  
  Posted by Thoritsu 5 years ago
  
  If the next election swings back, some things like that might happen.
  
  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink

2

Posted by exceller 5 years ago

Clash over the Constitution between Liz Cheney and Cortex:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/alex...

She badly needs lessons not only in the Constitution, but basics on how the Gov works.

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink

2

Posted by exceller 5 years ago

CA will ignore the order.

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink
- 4
  
  Posted by Thoritsu 5 years ago
  
  That might be even better.
  
  Would be interesting if this went on, and then Trump intervened.
  
  Would be a nice rhetoric: "When it suits the Democrats, the rule of law must be followed, but when it doesn't suit them, they can do as they please." Then throw the AG in Federal prison for contempt.
  
  I really wish he were better at playing this game. He could bait them into acts that could never pass scrutiny in the next election.
  
  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
  - 3
    
    Posted by allosaur 5 years ago
    
    Government officials responsible for sanctuary cities should be doing time in federal prisons too.
    
    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
    - 4
      
      Posted by Thoritsu 5 years ago
      
      Can’t argue with that. Just love the idea of a legal 2nd Amendment sanctuary to contrast an illegal immigration sanctuary.
      
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
      - 3
        
        Posted by allosaur 5 years ago
        
        When I heard Candidate Cackles say "My dream is open borders," me dino had a 30-shot 9mm carbine constructed with an AR-15 frame.
        Why? Me dino thought she would win.
        I call the carbine "The Evil Hag." Both are killers.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        -
        
        3
        
        Posted by Thoritsu 5 years ago
        
        No recoil there! Should be a sweet shooter.
        
        Have you looked at KelTecs stuff:
        https://www.keltecweapons.com/firearm...
        I like them because I’m a Floridian, and their stuff is very unique.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        -
        
        3
        
        Posted by allosaur 5 years ago
        
        I've seen carbines like that. I had to annually NRA qualify with a standard AR15 so I could catch tower duty during my 21 years as a corrections officer.
        My converted carbine is built into the "frame" that I'm used to. It's maximum effective range is the length of a football field and I figure that's all I need, shooting the same 9mm rounds for two pistols I have. And I have lots of 9mm rounds. Gonna get more.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        3
        
        Posted by Thoritsu 5 years ago
        
        Cool. I've looked at a few 9mm ARs, but haven't gone that way yet.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink

1

Posted by jdg 5 years ago

I'll celebrate when Trump replaces, or Congress impeaches, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal judges who are still successfully preventing Heller and MacDonald from applying in California and Hawaii.

Not to mention the bump stock nonsense. The 2nd ought to cover all weapons short of WMDs.

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink
- 1
  
  Posted by Thoritsu 5 years ago
  
  So ridiculous, the judicial branch legislating.
  
  Should have started this in the first half of his term. Too late now. Maybe if we win big in 2020.
  
  Boy, do I hope somebody unveils a bomb on 2016 Hillary/Loretta/Obama conspiracy. Right now, 99.9% of the media is looking for evidence of Trump's baldness in Mueller's report.
  
  Great to see you, Jan!
  
  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
  - 1
    
    Posted by jdg 5 years ago
    
    So you're saying that judges shouldn't "legislate" even when a statute is clearly unconstitutional? That would make the Constitution even more toothless than it is now. Or did you not mean that?
    
    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
    - 2
      
      Posted by Thoritsu 5 years ago
      
      I think that judges should enforce the law. The Constitution takes precedence over local and state statutes. Judges should clearly understand and enforce this. When they don’t, and decide to interpret the law as the choose (so called “living constitution”), they are legislating from the judicial branch.
      
      Interpreting the second amendment, or a SCOTUS precedent is not “legislating”. It is appropriate judging.
      
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink

Another Constitutional Win!

Add Comment

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

Working...