The Left’s Hate-crime Hoax Machine

Posted by  $  Solver 5 months, 2 weeks ago to Culture
18 comments | Share | Flag

“Often, hoaxes work because the postmodern doctrine of intersectionality demands that the general public play a pick-up game of "find the martyr." Like all workable belief systems, or long cons, it works because there is just enough truth. For the postmodern social-justice position, truth does not matter. Intersectionality stands as complete moral relativism. Intersectional doctrine repeats the ideological proposition that there are two positions: victim and oppressor. In reality, there's a third position used to accrue power: the oppressor masquerading as victim. Basically, those occupying this third position publicly attack people at their psychological core by asserting:

1. Nothing you believe (have been told or taught or know or is common sense) is true. Brain scrub.

2. Everything you or your kind have achieved was taken by violence and exploitation from the rightful owners. Not agreeing means you are a bigoted hater. Bad person.

3. You are complicit in all historical crimes and reap the benefits from them. Guilty person.

4. There can be no dissent. We are the voice of the new God, and the sky is falling. Heed us now. Saved person complies.

5. We are right and will not trifle with your Western logic, ethics, or facts; literature; history. They are all the tools of exploitation and oppression that you have used to destroy us and others. In fact, we will not even be seen speaking to you. Isolated person. ”

Add Comment


All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by  $  Dobrien 5 months, 2 weeks ago
    I have little doubt that if the police had found some poor homeless white men, Smollett would have identified them as his attackers. This is a man who campaigned for Kamala Harris and who knows Cory Booker. Smollett is a 36-year-old wealthy man, a celebrity. If he had been given the chance, he would have sent innocent people to prison — and who would have done so with support of the media and elected representatives.

    This is America 2019.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 5 months, 1 week ago
    The latest exercise in illogic from the left comes in the form of completely contradictory economic positions:

    1. Wealth is a zero sum game; i.e. when one person becomes wealthy, another must become poor, because the wealth is "stolen" from the limited amount available. That's why the government must restrict how wealthy people can become, so that the wealth is more evenly distributed.

    2. Wealth for government run social programs is unlimited, because the government can always print more "fiat" money.

    The first is obviously false, because if wealth is truly a fixed amount, and new wealth can't be produced except by theft, then we would be limited to whatever existed 5,000 years ago, when humanity first began exchanging tokens that represented wealth. The second defies common sense, because just printing money does not produce new wealth. Sadly, too many people eager for seeing the wealth spread around are willing to suspend reality and believe these totally contradictory premises.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by LarryHeart 5 months, 1 week ago
    The first thing reported about today's New Zealand massacre of Muslims is that the shooter was inspired by Trump and white identity.

    The Monster Ream media is going to have a field day of hating the hate inspired by Trump's election.

    Yes Hate is inspired by Trump...mostly the hate of crazies like the shooter and every progressive media voice against Trump, America and every one they deem to be an oppressor.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  Olduglycarl 5 months, 2 weeks ago
    So, in other words...they want to go back to the dark ages...

    I commented this on another post. They fail to see the evolution of Mankind and Civilization thru the ages...they should be thankful for Western Society because the rest of the world are barbaric by comparison.

    They just want power which means, they have already been corrupted by that desire...can you imagine what things would be like if the actually get it?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  5 months, 2 weeks ago
      “Funny” thing is that the far right and the far left desire power to control others, but the far right is shrinking and the far left is growing, while the vast majority wants to be free to choose their own path.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by bsmith51 5 months, 1 week ago
        The label, "far right" has been assigned by the media and the left to those who believe in the Constitution, as written. Such people do not want to control others. Hitler and Nazism have been assigned the same label, though Hitler was a socialist, which puts him firmly on the far left, next to Lenin, Stalin and Mao. Skinheads and white supremacists have been labeled "far right" but they are neither right not left; they are just thugs.
        Do not fall into the trap of accepting the labels of the left.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by TheRealBill 5 months, 1 week ago
          Actually the "larger" organized white supremacists are certainly on the left. You just need to look at what they argue for beyond their inane racial views to see it is the same thing. Indeed much of the "far left" and "far right" argue literally the same thing with the sole exception being which race it is. One "side" calls them ethnostates and the other "safe spaces". One uses the term "inclusive" to mean "excluding the whites" while the other is up front about excluding the non-whites. They both argue for strong government enforcement of their discredited racial views, govt. run schools, "free" education, government run medical, and much more government control over "capitalism" and industry in general. Pretty much the only difference between them, and it is not a substantive one, is which skin color is the "bad guy".

          The current batch of Progressives have returned almost entirely to the propositions and rhetoric of the Nazi Party and Hitler. Change "white man" to "Jew" and you'll see it. the argument about "proportional representation" is straight out of Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda.

          "The (Jew|white man) holds more positions of power and influence than his proportion should allow, thus they conspire against the rest of us".

          For the modern Progressives, the terms of choice are "patriarchy" and "(white|male) privilege", but the underlying argument is identical - and just as wrongheaded today as it was then.

          The "far X" labels are useless, but the term Progressive has consistently been used by every murderous regime of the twentieth century to refer to themselves. Spend enough time in that history and you come to the point that identifying one's self as "progressive" is like a beacon of warning.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by Blanco 5 months, 1 week ago
          Well said! Liberals try to manipulate us into changing our term for them to "progressives". I refuse to call them anything but liberals/socialists/statists/collectivists.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by TheRealBill 5 months, 1 week ago
            The Progressive vs. Liberal argument is actually fairly old and accurate. Both the Fascists and the Nazis (not the same thing!) were referred to by themselves and adoring fans as Progressives, and in the U.S. it was the Progressive Party and the Progressive FDR leading the charge against "liberalism" while enacting the heinous policies responsible for the horror show that is the 20th century on Earth. The term "Progressive" is historically correct, not a new change to cloak themselves. I say embrace it, then point out the historical performance of the Progressives such as Hitler, Mussolini, FDR, et al. ;)
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by NealS 5 months, 1 week ago
    It kind of makes me wonder about the New Zealand thing. Hard to imagine it happened there. I mean if they are willing to blow themselves up, perhaps they will do anything.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  blarman 5 months, 1 week ago
    All logic is subject to subjective verification of your Progressive Masters. Truth is only truth if we say so.

    2. You don't own anything. You are merely borrowing from your rightful Progressive Masters. We have the right to demand you relinquish to us anything you claim to own - even your own children and the fruits of your labors and mind. Why? Because we have an innate right to rule and govern.

    3. Because you are of the lower strata and we of the upper, we are the judges of everything and we are the ultimate arbiters of guilt and innocence - none of which is subject to objective truth.

    4. There can be no dissent because we say so. We are your overlords, masters, and pharaohs: your gods. You will worship us.

    5. There is no such thing as logic or ethics which apply to everyone because everything is subject to our interpretation.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  


  • Comment hidden. Undo