Most but not all of the "Classified leaks in the last two years have been done to damage the president and his people, not to provide necessary information to the American public. Some of the leaks did more damage to the intel community than damage to the president.
Just because the leaks assist uyour side doesn't make them an honorable thinkg to do. When people die because of a leak, you have done great harm not a great right.

What if it turns out there really was a coups? And if Barr has the proof? Whoa! Isn't that a conundrum?

Great graphic!

Really, do you not remember Clinton and Echelon. We used to call freinds, hood ladies of teh Midwest, say, "Are you listening Echelon?", then spout several of the trigger words which were supposed to alert the FBI. At the newspaler where we worked, we discovered our phones were bugged, no secret info over them.We were driving down a state hwy. in N.M. and were discovered by Trinity Site, and a B24 came down the road at us, low level, to pick up our license plates. There are cameras everywhere also now days. If you go after info, you might as well tell them in advance, and do it anyway. When a tea party meeting was held here, Feds showed up to monitor us, a rural town! Of course there is mass survellience, right here on the Internet, now that O gave it to the UN who put China in charge of it. Expect it, but don't let it stop you.

I was dumbfounded by some of the comments John Solomon and Sara Carter talked about during the interview with Mark Levin on or about April first, not an April fools joke. It was quite revealing, sounded like another "deep throat", with specific ties to Obama being aware, briefed, on the FISA application to spy on the Trump organization. I note today most of that interview has been deleted from the internet, claims of various copyrights and such.

Anyone that doesn't believe the underground in our government exists needs to read Sharyl Attkisson's book, Stonewalled. She only called it her "Fight for Truth against forces of Obstruction, Intimidation, and Harassment in Obama's Washington." She should have called it "treason" in my opinion. I believe every word she wrote because of her historical reporting of the past. It's unfortunate that we let these stories just fade away, instead of keeping them in plain site like the democrats did with the fake collusion story. They plan of never letting that one go. Someday even the truth will come out about the birthplace that didn't even exist when Obama was born, but it will be too late for anyone to care.

So far Trump's been right about every issue that's been thrown out there, but that too is a just political thing. Again, just my opinion, I could be wrong.

Just food for thought: Treason is defined, among other things, as passing government secrets to an enemy agency. Snowden released this important information to the media and the people of the United States. If Snowden is guilty of treason, the enemy of the government must necessarily be the people of the United States, which would explain a lot. I personally think Edward Snowden should be chiseled on Mt. Rushmore.

I am assuming that the government essentially knows everything that I do already. Anything that I put on the computer, cell phone, or on social media is available to them- whenever they want it.

Am I correct that Congress doesn't enforce the 24th Amendment? I seem to recall the vote must come from the Cabinet officers. I don't think I am wrong about that, but I was wrong about something once!

Julian Assange: Hero or Zero

_ He's a traitor and should be extradited and prosecuted for treason.

_ He released information the American People had a right to know about. He should be investigated for any criminal activities but not for publishing the information he obtained from Manning.

√ The First Amendment trumps all. The government should be transparent.

"The only reason we know as much as we do about the 2016 episode was because the Senior Director for Human Rights and Human Freedoms of the McCain Institute, David Kramer, was given the dossier alleging the conspiracy by former British spy Christopher Steele, the document’s author. Kramer then gave it to Buzzfeed reporter Ken Bensinger, who read it, took pictures of it and had it published in Jan. 2017."

Yes, these are facts, unlike the concocted reasons for the Mueller probe.

Comey has already chimed in saying "surveillance is not spying."

It is. It is a synonym, Comey. The act is the same.