NYT is psychopathic and murderous. It is an institution that has long outlived its usefullness.

The application of the basic destruction of the enemy promulgated by Alinsky has now started in on the corporations that provide the life blood of the economy and basic civilization.
The corporations so attacked should be encouraged to fight back with all available resources.
It is clear that the socialists and climate changers realize they can't win at the ballot box any more so they are turning on the perceived sources of the problem.
+1

The "Times" article, which is the introduction to the whole section hammering on catastrophic climate change (CCC), is a carefully structured threat conceived by Nathaniel Rich. He says: this is the worst negative view of corporations and, if you guys don't give in to all "carbon emissions" dictates, the view will be confirmed. Then, you will be treated like mental patients and coerced in all matters. Now, why would corporations continue to advertise in the "New York Times" and support the...New York Times Corporation?

In that case, by the same illiberal logic, the NYT and all other newspapers should be forced to go completely electronic.

Of course they do. It isn't about truth, but a narrative. And since they don't have the truth on their side they have to shut down anyone who tries to share the truth and expose the narrative.

Laughing...although some of the top CEO's are in fact psychopaths, they are Not responsible for the climate changing...Nature and the Sun are.

The moment one states that climate change is a natural cycle guided by the sun, the climate creatures turn to the environmental problems...yes, big corps and government unelected bureaucrats have ruined our environment but environment and climate are two different things and have no effect upon each other.
It's all a ruse to diminish America's and the West's productivity.

Thanks for the excellent article, Walter. I almost didn't read it because your link was to facebook instead of the article.

No problem - I can address climate change:

"Climate change is occurring at a rate of approx 0.13C or 0.2F per decade, probably as a result of residual warming due to the end of the global Medieval Ice Age. The anthrocentric component of this change is probably vanishing small. We intend to enjoy the warm weather, the decrease in drought and the lowering of human deaths that result from this benign change." (quote myself)

There! I have addressed it.

Jan

Freedom of speech is the "Last Garrison" in the fight to save Western Civilization, and NYT, CNN, and others are doing their best to undermine the garrison insiduously.

The NYT has long devolved into a despicable hack propaganda rag extension of the globalist so-called socialist wannabe commie Jackass Party.

Is this that global warming crap? Send them to the Texas Gulf Coast. It is Spring time and we are still turning on our heaters! Where's the d___ warming?

Sounds like another dangerous clown that believes they are morally superior also.

The NYT is complicit in keeping real climate info from the people. It is the Sun, which controls climate. Even more, no one is talking about the coming switching of the Earth's magnetic poles, which is likely to cause all kinds of chaos and cooling. Politicians don't know, or ignore it, as neither will give them power,. Blaming CO2 is the way they control people, but it does nothing to change the reality of what is really happening.

Who reads the New York Times? It's a rag!

And just what does NYT stand for?

As soon as I read this: "Behind the introduction, which is entitled, “The Climate Issue: Introduction,” there is a personal story. It is not told in the Times, of course. In August 2018, Nathaniel Rich published an epic (30-page) Times article arguing that the United States and the world missed their single best opportunity to head off CCC. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, he argued, “everyone knew” about the threat of CCC, the “science” was done except for a few details—and no one did anything.", I realized Nathaniel Rich is a propagandist relying on the notion the NYT readers are idiots without a memory or are all young people that have been fully indoctrinated into the lefts mantra. Unfortunately for Rich, there are a few old folks around that clearly recall the CCC whine in the late 1970s and early '80s was "Global cooling, Global cooling" and NYC was expected to be under a sheet of ice by the year 2000. Not only has the means of doom kept changing, but the dastardly date of doom keeps moving as well. Whatever...

Walter - do you have another link I could use to check this article out? The Facebook link isn't working. Thanks!