LOL! First laugh of the day - thanks.

It's always the same thing from the left => kill...

This thread is not about banning abortions. It is about a blocked bill only intended to save out of the womb babies from botched abortions.

Your so-called "statements of fact" have nothing to do with the comparative relevant fact of Democrats blocking a Republican bill to save infants from botched abortions.

You are sidestepping the fact that the fetus or child (whatever name you use) has to be killed prior to removal after 24 weeks. This is the simple fact that tells me at some point in the future it won't matter what age, if it becomes inconvenient, just snip the back of the neck.

I'm not advocating banning, just upholding natural law. I have plenty of arguments but I wont respond to you anymore. I know I'm not changing your mind, even if I'm right. I don't have time to waste on futile arguments.

No need to put titles on people for whom you don't know.

Good day.

"A is A.
Evil is Evil."
Yes. Those who want to ban abortion certainly are.

"Why wouldn't it? If it's too inconvenient in the womb, wait until it's born."
What does this mean?
You can't do anything with a "child" in the womb since that's not a child.
Nothing done, to the unborn is "murder" and "your book" doesn't have a proper definition of it.
This entire post seems to be the typical religious, leftist, conflation of abortion with harming children, in order to advocate banning or regulating the former, because you have no arguments to directly do so.

Statements of fact, that you can verify through simple observation yourself, is not "duck and weave."

That's what you keep doing.

Me dino hereby considers meself clarified. Thank you, Abasco, for your welcomed assistance and support.
Coming to me dino's aid in such a dramatic clear and coincise manner is very, very much appreciated.
May you live long and prosper.

Why wouldn't it? If it's too inconvenient in the womb, wait until it's born. Once the child is past 24 weeks, they have to inject it to kill it before it can be removed. In my book that's murder because it can survive with assistance after 24 weeks. So at some point it will no longer matter if it's a before birth kill or an after birth kill, if it becomes too inconvenient it will become accepted

KILL! KILL! KILL!

There...glad I could clarify that for you...

How wonderfully, that is.

Thank you.

Allosaur, I meant you are so right! Good going!

Oh my dear, you are sooooo right!

So slippery! You wonderfully you duck and weave.

There are no bills, legalizing the murder of any infants.
This is like the misreporting of governor Northam's very clear comments.

You said, "My guess is it will. I expect in the next 5 -10 years it will be okay to off a 2 month old that became an inconvenience."

What made you come to such a conclusion?

Raising a two-year-old is the definition of trouble.
Been there, done that.

The logical question is this: How many breaths does a baby have to take before it is protected by law? Is it 1 breath or 100 breaths or something in between......or what if it survives for days and then dies? When exactly is it declared immune from the law allowing it to just die? Taken to the absurd extreme, what about a troublesome two-year old?

It's called murder~
https://www.mrctv.org/blog/dems-just-...

Me dino definitely would. I'm already donating some money to groups who wants the government aka "We The People" to defund Planned Parenthood.

When the cat is away, Dem rats will play.

AOC is saying we should have less children now because climate change will make them all suffer.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/alexa...

Democrats blocking a Republican bill about saving infants from botched abortions is NOT dishonest reporting.
It is a hard fact that stands alone without the rest of your stated irrelevant diversionary smoke and mirrors. .

Seeing those faces makes one throw up.

I read that a woman in Oxford, England went public by announcing that it is a good thing fewer children are being born b/c it'll eliminate their carbon footprints.

Wonder if she'd throw herself off a cliff in order to improve air quality?