- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Thank you for this
Anyone who has been doing simulated programming is aware that the outcome is just as good as the input is.
These "scientists" are using models where they are using scenarios that won't hold on the long term b/c they can't program in changes they don't know about today.
do not take it into account for Suns influence during these discharges so it ultimately by default gets put on mans influence on the ledger.
He has become such an expert. The forcing , the
Immediate impact electrical currents have and of course the most energetic solar events are attributed to man , that blows my mind how skewed and worthless the fancy model is.
Funny, once they include particle forcing...the carbon effect goes to 0 in their c[lie]mate models!
I wish he had said it, although he eluded to it...environment and climate are two different things. Sure, the heat island effect of the cities changes things at ground level in that local but not globally.
PS...you beat me to this one...+1 Brother...nothing like friendly competition between brothers dependent upon each other to each be the best we can be.
Will be posting private, the talk by August Dunning...no one public even looked at it but I know, amongst the group of integrated individuals we have assembled...it will be appreciated for what it is.