Pelosi’s Letter Effectively Bans Trump From Delivering Traditional State of the Union

Posted by $ nickursis 5 years, 2 months ago to Politics
56 comments | Share | Flag

Now this is o revealing of an animal thrashing and trying to escape a trap. They created the mess, and now want to double down on it. POTUS needs to send them a written response with a few paragraphs of all the things they have done , and outline their crazy looter proposals, and then have a public address to the nation in lieu of the address and tell the people just where its at. The deep state tries to fight back and looks dumber every time they try.
SOURCE URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pelosi-letter-effectively-bans-trump-160823897.html


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by KC-2019 5 years, 2 months ago
    The President does not need anyone’s permission to address Americans. So he can talk to them directly from the Oval Office.

    Democrats fail to see the strength and determination of this president.

    He communicates directly everyday. He started a new tradition ignoring the press. This will be a great new tradition. Direct from the Oval Office ....President Trump
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 5 years, 2 months ago
    The Constitution does not specify what form in which the President is to report the state of the union to Congress, nor when. I'd love to see an end to the theatrics that go on at each state of the union address. Send Congress a written memo, and speak to the public from the oval office.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ycandrea 5 years, 2 months ago
    She does not have the power or the authority to request this. President Trump can deliver the State of the Union Address anywhere he wants. The Senate or the Whitehouse will be just fine.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 5 years, 2 months ago
      She has SOME power, if just because she is in charge of the House. She withdrew the invitation, and without it you do not have a joint resolution. So, no House. Too Bad. Go to the Senate, or from Oval Office. I even liked the idea of doing the ralley and sending her a note on a napkin "Everything will be fine, in a few weeks, just wait and see" and call it a day.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Arthgallo 5 years, 2 months ago
    open the California/Mexico border, let them all in with maps to Pelosi's Estate. Move all border agents and ICE to keep them in California. She wants them, let her have them all. She is a non-player thinking she has power.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Lnxjenn 5 years, 2 months ago
      On that note: did you see Laura Loomers' stunt? She brought illegals onto Nancy Pelosi's napa valley home. when the police showed up, she said that Nancy said everyone was welcome. I got a good chuckle out of the whole thing. The police were very polite. So no fussing. I think the couple of the illegal guys were a bit nervous. not sure what happened to them afterwards.

      I think between basically all of California Democrat control, let all of them take those illegals into their own homes and property. I have yet to see any of them do it. even if for just a political stunt.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 5 years, 2 months ago
    To me it is revealing that it is admitted that the pomp and circumstance of the state of the union began in 1913. That's the same year that the people became enslaved by (1) the Federal Reserve Act, (2) the law that provides property security for the fiat public debt- the 16th Amendment that enslaves the people with unconstitutional income taxation, and (3) the 17th Amendment that transfers power of the Senate from the state governments to the federal election system (controlled by the national political parties.)

    It's time to do away with all these laws, regulations, and trappings of "pull" over merit, ending the era of aristocracy over sovereign people.
    Just write the SOTU and send it in a group of tweets. The congress should be treated with "all due respect."
    Trump just gave the public an address. Another one would cheapen the importance of the earlier address.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by exceller 5 years, 2 months ago
      No it wouldn't.

      The president covered one crucial issue but there are several others he needs to provide to the nation.

      It would not cheapen anything, except the left.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by freedomforall 5 years, 2 months ago
        If its evidence to break the deep state, then, it's worth doing. Otherwise, it will just lower the concentration needed to accomplish the task that is needed to eliminate the immigration "emergency."
        Confusing the enemy with disinformation in a national televised speech also confuses those supporting the administration.
        The State of the Union is just a show; bread and circuses, unless there is real evidence and the guilty members of con-gress are taken into custody.
        Now that would be a sight for a national tv audience.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Turfprint 5 years, 2 months ago
    PELOSI:.. JUST IN... PELOSI'S OFFICE DENIES IT WAS HER BRAIN LEAKING OUT OF HER RIGHT EAR AS SHE TILTED HER HEAD IN RECENT PRESS CONFERENCE. IN A QUICK SPIN ON EVENTS HER PR SAID SHE HAS HAD MASTOID ISSUES SINCE HER FALL FROM THE PIANO AT THE NORTH BEACH CONDOR CLUB AS A TEEN.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 5 years, 2 months ago
    If I were in the House of Reps and Pelosi was speaking for me, as she seems to be speaking for all the others, I would begin to question what medication she was taking?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by diessos 5 years, 2 months ago
    I agree. He should just give the "state of the union" as a public address and then send the speech AS-IS to the congress. It does not have to be delivered in person. But in that speech, Trump should call out Pelosi and Schumer for the obstructionist that they are.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 5 years, 2 months ago
    I'm pretty sure the Senate has more 'Class' than the House! How dare she do that? Who gave her so much authority? She is a Dictator! Or thinks she is. Boy is she headed for a fall.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by bobsprinkle 5 years, 2 months ago
    Does POTUS actually need the permission of the Speaker to enter and/or give a speech from the House of Reps? If not, the President should march straight up to the podium and deliver his speech.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 5 years, 2 months ago
      Yes, the rules say the Speaker controls the podium as well as actual access to the chamber, although they cannot refuse a member entrance unless they challenge their election. Trump is not a member, so he can be locked out.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by bobsprinkle 5 years, 2 months ago
        My first response is to say....well change the rules!!!
        But then, it would have to apply for the dummycrats as well. So, maybe not a good idea.
        I wonder what venue would be large and prominent enough that is in the DC area. It would have to be inside this time of the year.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 5 years, 2 months ago
    Correction: All Pelosi's letter does is prevent Trump from delivering the State of the Union address from the House floor - its traditional location. She can't stop him if he holds it anywhere else, which is precisely if I were him what I would do. What better political statement than to deliver the speech from a stadium filled with normal people rather than to the political hacks on Capitol Hill? And Pelosi would have played right into it!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 5 years, 2 months ago
    Give it at a rally.
    Might I suggest Oneonta , Alabama.
    #MAGA
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 5 years, 2 months ago
      That was a suggestion tonight on Fox, and Spicer had a hissy fit. I like the idea. Would be a populist hit with people, except the whiners who say " I missed it". There are always DVR's and You Tube.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Dobrien 5 years, 2 months ago
        To bad Fox is putting so many liberals on with their idiotic arguing and emotional gibberish.
        Juan Williams gets free passes to make false claims against Trump. This Obama aid here former DNC that blah blah blah. Nauseating actually.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 5 years, 2 months ago
          Juan and Judge Nap have gone to the dark side, if just to give Fox a "fair and balanced" excuse. However, it just eliminates them from any serious consideration for the future.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 5 years, 2 months ago
    They are like bickering children. I want to tell them to knock off the nonsense. I see no conspiracy or intentional looting. It's more like the tabloids have taken over. I think I'm getting old.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 5 years, 2 months ago
      The looting is rampid and they are afraid of going to jail.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ 5 years, 2 months ago
        CG is just speaking the party line, seen on both sides. Yet he fails to mention Occasio Cortez al Rumbas tirade in the house blaming Trump, claiming he is starving all the non citizen invaders, thet he took the Lindburgh baby and that he picks his nose. Nope, just bickering. Yet Pelosi and Schumer were the epitome of polite political discourse with "NO", and now "Open it up and we might talk to you". Yep, bickering. I would hate to see how you negotiate a car deal....that must qualify as open warfare...
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by exceller 5 years, 2 months ago
      No conspiracy or intentional looting?

      Then you live on a different planet.

      The left's resistance permeates EVERY single move they undertake, and there are many. Taken together it amounts to a giant conspiracy to the effect of preventing the president from governing.

      They miscalculated on the wisdom of Trump, though. The more they are destroying every aspect of our lives, the more resolve the president has.

      As for intentional looting: have you not followed the proposed bills the left is intending to pass? If that is not looting, I don't know what is.

      Where do you put tax on drinking water, as an example?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by rtpetrick 5 years, 2 months ago
      I'm getting old also...but what is really getting old is nonsense associated with Trump hating Left. The latest dust off over the SOTU address is going to come back to bite Pelosi and Dems in the derriere.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by exceller 5 years, 2 months ago
    Hogwash.

    Pelosi can throw tantrums as long as she wants but that will not deter the president from delivering his message.

    Pelosi has a reason to do her antics: she sees the writing on the wall when Trump connects with the nation.

    Of course the link is on "Yahoo"...guess which side is it on?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 5 years, 2 months ago
      Ok, so it is on Yahoo, but just because something is on RT or North Korea News, doesn't make it automatically fake. With so few choices, and the obfuscation they put up, it's not easy to find reliable sources. Fox has it's flaws, and the Blaze also has been know to slant news, so you get what you can. The actual source is Fortune mag, which still is MSM member, but the gist of the article is backed up by several other similar ones.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by exceller 5 years, 2 months ago
        I have a yahoo account so I can see daily what news they are posting.

        Never, not once, have I seen a post or article that was conservative, let alone pro Trump.

        Yahoo is based in Silicone Valley. You know the culture there, don't you?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo