Governor Kate Brown pushes bill to have Universal state visits to parents and their newborns.

Posted by Dobrien 5 years, 2 months ago to History
43 comments | Share | Flag

For a political party who doesn’t even know what gender a soul is. LBGTQWHATTHEFAMI. These people who want you to kill your baby just before delivery ,so they can sell the body parts. After that Then they will decide if you are following subjective state rules for childcare in your own home if you have a baby. First of all consider this. Children placed in foster care are 50% more likely to suffer abuse.
The reality is the state will send in a “nurse or a childcare specialist” who will probably have a quota a QUOTA . They will determine if the child is being cared for according to their subjective opinion.
It is expected that every new mother will be “visited” 3 times. This is not acceptable.
Speak up. Light up the dark intent. We are in an “Uncivil War “ we must fight back. There is no gulch this is where we all reside. Stand up against this enslavment. Think about some genderless stranger from the state visiting your daughter and deciding they want your grandchild to be placed in the care of the state.

The proposed bill is a continuation of policies straight out of the Obama White House which aggressively sought to nudge Americans toward accepting ever-increasing government involvement in their private lives.

With the introduction of its Julia website, the Obama Administration demonstrated how a person could be wholly government dependent, from birth until death. The site was short-lived as Americans recoiled from its premise, with even CNN calling it the “Wrong vision for America.”
SOURCE URL: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/oregon-governor-supports-mandatory-govt-visits-for-all-newborns-and-their-p


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by term2 5 years, 2 months ago
    Leftists governments always look for "problems" that they propose to fix through "controls" of one sort or another.

    What about single parent households, mostly in black neighborhoods. Welfare payments would have to be tied to passing the inspections, and then there would be governmental safe houses for the kids taken away from the parents (run by government of course). Didnt Hitler do this stuff?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 5 years, 2 months ago
    Are parents going to be facing child abuse charges because they choose not to rear their child in a "genderless" manner? I can hear it now: "You raised our suspicion when you insisted the birth certificate indicated 'male' instead of 'X'. Why did you do that?"

    The only problem with the movie "Idiocracy" was that it didn't depict the future as insane as it has become.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 5 years, 2 months ago
    Oboy! Kate Brown scored a hit! This is that cradle to the grave thing. What don't they understand about less government is the best government? What makes these people think they are in charge and we are stupid children? I resent all this regulation crap.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by evlwhtguy 5 years, 2 months ago
    Remember....that baby really isn't yours......it belongs to the state. Even if you abort....that state will profit by selling the organs.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by term2 5 years, 2 months ago
      I forgot that women were just carriers of the state property. If we all are property of the state, of course the baby would be.

      Time to move to another country. Problem is that essentially all countries are statist to one degree or another.

      If we can somehow shrink the federal government and return powers to the states, it would at least be some competition among states to restrict freedoms more or less.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by evlwhtguy 5 years, 2 months ago
        The first guy in my lifetime that seems likely to shrink the federal government is Trump.....but I have not seen him speak directly to reducing headcount....just limiting power. He may not be in a position to reduce headcount without taking an ax to it...by closing down the government for more than a month and laying off whole departments as is proscribed by law. He is legitimately trying to govern....but Pelosi and company will not.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by term2 5 years, 2 months ago
          Trump seems to be pandering a bit to the other side in some misguided attempt to get bi partisanship. I say- how to you negotiate with someone breaking into your house and trying to take your stuff or kill you. Do you allow them to take "some" of your stuff so they dont kill you, or do you fight it on principle? Trump should just do what he can while he is in office , like declare a national emergency, and get a few things done
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by 5 years, 2 months ago
            Every thing is not as it seems to be. This Build the Wall narrative is designed to show the people the Demons don't care about American citizens. The wall is being built Trump has said so many times.
            The Govt shutdown was a trial run to see what are essential services are needed.
            The next one will be used to cut a lot of fat.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by term2 5 years, 2 months ago
              I liked 25% of the government shut down. Lets just make it the least "needed" sections of it. Sexual reproduction of kangaroo rats and the like- get rid of them and the people working there. Definitely dont give retroactive pay for sitting at home and that would cause a bunch of quits. Good riddance.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 5 years, 2 months ago
    Almost nobody knows what's really driving this. I'd tell you...but I don't want to upset you...And, this would upset you...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 25n56il4 5 years, 2 months ago
      I don't think I am upset! I am angry! I feel insulted! How dare these DA's propose all this obviously stupid legislation? They are making the U. S. a joke! I am taking a trip out of the country in March and I may just stay there!
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 5 years, 2 months ago
      Abaco You have suggested you have information that we don’t want to know , now and in the past. Wrong , This is the time to speak up. We are at war with the ruling elite. You know it ....shed light on the darkness. They will kill babies at full term for profit. What more could upset us.
      It is the Great Awakening.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ Abaco 5 years, 2 months ago
        I've seen things over the past decade that are absolutely over-the-top shocking. I'm pretty guarded on this stuff. You want a hint, a tiny example?

        Soon you will see new medical clinics constructed on public school campuses. Won't say how I know this. But, just last week I predicted it with a couple close associates and today I got a phone call on the first one I've heard being planned. That's all I'm gonna say about that. They didn't have money for school nurses in the 90s and beyond...but they suddenly have funding to build medical clinics on elementary schools. Mull that one over...
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 5 years, 2 months ago
          Thank you . I was hoping you would see my comment asking you. I will do some digging.
          My instincts immediately tell me this is part of a bigger plan. I hate most of the plans made for us because they are basically plans for someone else like the planners.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by exceller 5 years, 2 months ago
      What drives it? I think we know what drives it. Everyone who understands AS knows what is driving it.

      Did you see "Equilibrium"? The film depicting what happens when government eliminates emotions in the citizenry? Making it mandatory to use a drug (Prosium) and having children reporting their parents if they don't?

      The ultimate nirvana of communists.

      That is where it leads to.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by mccannon01 5 years, 2 months ago
        I never saw"Equalibrium", but the Movie "Serenity" touches on what can happen when such drug is unleashed on a population. In that story 90% eventually became so nonaggressive they couldn't even feed themselves and died where they were. The other 10% went totally insane and became the dreaded Reevers.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by exceller 5 years, 2 months ago
    So what happens to parents who refuse these "visits"? Are they going to be dragged away and thrown in prison, leaving the child at the mercy of the state? That is probably the intent.

    I remember the directive the evil Hussein came up with that grooming of children should start at kindergarten, to make sure they are indoctrinated from an early age and embrace the communist mindset. Now they are starting even earlier. Next intrusion will come at conception.

    What does Nickursis think about this? He lives in OR.

    BTW, what a terrible looking woman this Brown is! All the monsters are congregating to the dem party.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Abaco 5 years, 2 months ago
      They'll take the kids and throw the parents in jail - yes. Not much different than a farmer taking calves from the cow and holding them in a pen to be fattened up for slaughter.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 5 years, 2 months ago
    One thing Jordan Peterson said in one of his YouTube videos- If you have an aggressive kid at 4, he will be aggressive at 15 and probably in jail shortly thereafter. Until aggressive behavior settles down at 27. SO, the government probably figures they can "solve" this problem by somehow calming down the 4 year olds in the first place through enforced parenting.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Stormi 5 years, 2 months ago
    this has operated in some states off and on since the influx of outcome based ed under Clinton. It is all a tip of the hat to ole Chairman Mao, and his cradle to grave, get kids away from parents as soon as possible. Only the state can best indoctrinate the children to think correctly, the parents might corrupt them. God forbid parents might be religious gun owners too! They are in the parents lives from then on, and if parents act conservative, children's services just might show up for an inspection. It happened to our neighbor, who lived in a five bedroom house, with every bedroom opening to the swimming pool. But, they made the mistake of grounding their 13 year old who was sneaking out that patio door to meet boys. In came children's sevrices when she told someone about being grounded. They are not our children, remember Hillary's village? Parent have to interact with the kids, warn them of the dangers, that they could end up in foster care, and if they are about 10, give them their own copy of "Anthem", they are old enough to get it.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CaptainKirk 5 years, 2 months ago
    Young girls Fostered by "Immigrant" families in England suffered beyond imagination! Who would have thought that letting people foster young girls who don't believe in their religion was a bad idea, when their holy book says it's okay to rape them?

    If you can stomach it, read the book "Easy Meat", and realize we are the same path as England!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 5 years, 2 months ago
      Well that’s what happens when the world is run by P-dough files.
      Some of these Children’s Care homes should be renamed to “Don’t Care Homes for children.
      Just one small example : Tuam Children’s home in
      Ireland. At This don’t care home 800 skeletons of infants and children found in a septic tank. Apparently the Catholic Nuns did not think they deserved a proper burial.
      Another liddle example is Boys Town. see http://salem-news.com/articles/decemb...
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo