Great news suspect is apprehended in Wisconsin

Posted by Dobrien 5 years, 3 months ago to News
22 comments | Share | Flag

Abducted 13 yr old from Barron county , Wisconsin. Rescued after 3 months.
Both parents were murdered . Blessings to her.

https://www.weau.com/content/news/Jay...
SOURCE URL: https://madison.com/wsj/news/local/crime/full-report-read-the-latest-on-barron-county-girl-whose/collection_478936a0-52b7-5cfc-a3b4-0eeccf2f424b.html


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by mshupe 5 years, 3 months ago
    According to a former federal investigator, stranger abductions are rare, living victims who escape even more rare.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 5 years, 3 months ago
      Yes , thankfully rare. I could not say she was lucky the poor young girl.
      I am hopeful that she can have some happiness in the future.
      We are lucky the unwashed deplorable was caught.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 5 years, 3 months ago
    I think family should decide the fate of this idiot. Once you have violated the rights of another, the rights of the perp should be NOT protected, and anyone should be able to violate his right in a similar way without prosecution.

    Might make people want to protect their own rights a bit more by not violating others' rights.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ pixelate 5 years, 3 months ago
    Whether or not the death penalty is a useful tool in discouraging capital crimes is irrelevant. I recall making clear my favor for the death penalty when I was a young person in college. Some of my profs though that I was cruel and blood-thirsty... seriously ... 30+ years ago and the situation has not gotten better.

    And yet, of the students in the discussions, I was the only person that could guarantee the the guilty murderer would never harm again. And, that no further funds would be expended on maintaining the care of the guilty.

    As far as the notion that exterminating these animals is more costly than just keeping them on death row -- I say, leave it to me. A single 22 shell to the back of the head, wrap the body in contractor bags and dump it into the green bin for Thursday morning pick up. Yes, I am a very horrible person. Hope I didn't violate the TOS by being so brazen in my depiction of swift and cost-effective justice.

    [Edit] Back in the day (college) and even more-so in the present -- when I make my views on the death penalty clear, there will be the person that inquires "but how would you feel if you were ever accused of first degree murder -- wouldn't you want to know that you will not be killed?" That inquiry tells me quite a deal about the mind of the individual asking the question... in particular, in terms of association.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by LibertyBelle 5 years, 3 months ago
      The only reason I could accept for being against it, is the same as Ayn Rand's: the possibility of executing an innocent person by mistake.--Still, I have not heard that in this case there has been any claim of mistaken identity.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by 5 years, 3 months ago
        Many cases where there is no chance of mistaken guilt should not hide behind the questionable with a shadow of doubt case.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by LibertyBelle 5 years, 3 months ago
          And can you guarantee there will be any such cases with "no chance of mistaken guilt"?Though there may not be a case of mistaking one person for another, there may be mistakes as to which was the real murder weapon, etc.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by 5 years, 3 months ago
            I can’t guarantee anything except the executed will never kill again.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by LibertyBelle 5 years, 3 months ago
              And if you execute the wrong person, the actual murderer may still go on killing again and again and again.--I am all for vengeance; really, because revenge is a very important part of justice. But still, justice requires a fair and true assessment of facts. If correctness can be guaranteed , then I would be all for it, in such a case.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by 5 years, 3 months ago
                I am not in the legal profession. I would say a fair and just trial with a jury of your peers that proves beyond a shadow of doubt. Innocent or Guilty. That is the system I am comfortable with.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 5 years, 3 months ago
      “And yet, of the students in the discussions, I was the only person that could guarantee the the guilty murderer would never harm again. And, that no further funds would be expended on maintaining the care of the guilty.“
      I made the same argument in grade school discussions on the death penalty.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by evlwhtguy 5 years, 3 months ago
    I am just glad to hear that she seems to have had no part in the crime. Based on her appearance I doubted it but it is often hard to tell just by appearance and demeanor. It will be interesting to find out how he targeted her. The young man certainly seems to have an unusual background.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo