Justice Ginsberg Missing Oral Arguments for the First Time

Posted by $ Olduglycarl 6 years, 6 months ago to Government
48 comments | Share | Flag

YAY! This is a Good sign for the revival of the supreme court, abet enduring another Kavanaugh circus.
But...Q brings up some interesting points: see attached photo.
Didn't know that Ginsberg was such a cultural marxist in the post modern movement.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by evlwhtguy 6 years, 6 months ago
    Her clerks are writing her opinions. Next thing you know they will embalm her like Lenin and set her up in a "Mausoleum" and she can serve forever with a succession of lib clerks to write her opinions.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by diessos 6 years, 6 months ago
    Bill Clinton appointed her, but I'll bet that she was Hillary's pick.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 6 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    93-7 Confirmation . I voted for Ross Perot . Back then was when it was clear to me that the Washington freaks did not give a shit about me and my young family. My judgement of their character was not flattering and my observations told me that they were frauds. Little did I know how right I was. Good night.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 6 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Interesting...I can do a "Print Screen" save it to downloads or in pictures. When I click on the photo and get to make changes...I still can't copy it, not even if I save it to word or a PDF...I would have to print, then re-scan and put in word. For most of what I post, that would mean a degradation in readability.

    But when I loaded the image above and then clicked on it, I was able to enlarge it ( in MS8.1) and it was readable.

    PS, I added new video content to the Nova posts and watched all the Gen. 6 conspiracy private post. The guy goes Deep into the weeds credibly...not fully convinced on all of it but he did have the same info that I have gotten from the Global Watch group I get content from.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 6 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I am using an iPad. I can’t start my copy in the titIe , have to start in the text and then expand what I want copied. Sometimes I have to do a “hard shutdown” if a function is not working.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 6 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks...I was unable to copy it...it won't let me no matter what I do or where I down load it to.

    How the heck did you do that? Did you print it first?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 6 years, 6 months ago
    OUC I know you added this to your comment but it is hard to read allow me to reprint Q’s post on
    RBG
    he History of Ruth Bader Ginsburg; Appointed by Bill Clinton
    2653
    Q
    !!mG7VJxZNCI
    6 Jan 2019 - 9:32:35 AM
    [RBG]
    Why was she 'selected'?
    Who appointed her?
    Remember [her] history.
    Ref: 230-page book called Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, published in 1977 by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
    Highlights:
    >Called for the sex-integration of prisons and reformatories so that conditions of imprisonment, security and housing could be equal. She explained, “If the grand design of such institutions is to prepare inmates for return to the community as persons equipped to benefit from and contribute to civil society, then perpetuation of single-sex institutions should be rejected.” (Page 101)
    >Called for the sex-integration of Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts because they “perpetuate stereotyped sex roles.” (Page 145)
    >Insisted on sex-integrating “college fraternity and sorority chapters” and replacing them with “college social societies.” (Page 169)
    >Cast constitutional doubt on the legality of “Mother’s Day and Father’s Day as separate holidays.” (Page 146)
    >Called for reducing the age of consent for sexual acts to people who are “less than 12 years old.” (Page 102)
    >Asserted that laws against “bigamists, persons cohabiting with more than one woman, and women cohabiting with a bigamist” are unconstitutional. (Page 195)
    >Objected to laws against prostitution because “prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” (Page 97)
    >Ginsburg wrote that the Mann Act (which punishes those who engage in interstate sex traffic of women and girls) is “offensive.” Such acts should be considered “within the zone of privacy.” (Page 98)
    >Demanded that we “firmly reject draft or combat exemption for women,” stating “women must be subject to the draft if men are.” But, she added, “the need for affirmative action and for transition measures is particularly strong in the uniformed services.” (Page 218)
    >An indefatigable censor, Ginsburg listed hundreds of “sexist” words that must be eliminated from all statutes. Among words she found offensive were: man, woman, manmade, mankind, husband, wife, mother, father, sister, brother, son, daughter, serviceman, longshoreman, postmaster, watchman, seamanship, and “to man” (a vessel). (Pages 15-16)
    >Wanted he, she, him, her, his, and hers to be dropped down the memory hole. They must be replaced by he/she, her/him, and hers/his, and federal statutes must use the bad grammar of “plural constructions to avoid third person singular pronouns.” (Page 52-53)
    >Condemned the Supreme Court’s ruling in Harris v. McRae and claimed that taxpayer-funded abortions should be a constitutional right.
    http://humanevents.com/2005/08/23/sen...
    Who are the doctors 'currently' treating [RBG]?
    What other political [former/current] sr. political heads are they affiliated w/?
    What 'off-market' drugs are being provided to [RBG] in order to sustain minimum daily function?
    What is the real medical diagnosis of [RBG]?
    Who is managing her care?
    Who is 'really' managing her care?
    The clock is ticking.
    PANIC IN DC.
    Q
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 6 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Laughing. I did chuckle when I read it but thought it was totally apropos...funny but thought it true.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by exceller 6 years, 6 months ago
    Oh, Brother!

    I knew she was on the extreme left but never imagined she promoted all these outlandish "ideas" in Q's post.

    Some of it must have been known before she was appointed? How did the Senate missed it?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 6 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The bottom part of the Q post, might be fiction or questions to raise suspicion, (below the link) but the upper part about what she wrote and aspired to do is historical evidence that shows she was an idiot.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 6 years, 6 months ago
    "last month underwent a pulmonary lobectomy"
    No mention of her '92 lobotomy that is required before selection and confirmation of all socialist/statist jurists.
    (BTW, the comment above is fiction, "merely corroborative detail, intended to give artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative.")
    Ginsberg should have retired years ago. I won't be surprised if they keep her on the court after she stops unassisted breathing until a Democrat is POTUS.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 6 years, 6 months ago
    She even wanted to eliminate, by law, the use of the word Man, Men, Mankind and any job description with those words attached.
    You would think that anyone educated in law and especially in what words a phrases mean, that she would know that these words, by historical definition only refers to one being HUMAN!
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo