This is Huge! The Blaze TV and CRTV have merged!
Glenn and Mark Levin and a whole bunch of big names all in one place...this is the largest merger in internet TV news and Entertainment programing...all for $9.00 a month. CRTV/Levin alone was 30.00 a month...now it's all rolled into one platform, one place for an unbeatable price!
The left will definitely see this as a threat!
The left will definitely see this as a threat!
SOURCE URL: https://www.blazetv.com/
It'll be great once they get it all sorted out. The Tech's have a big job ahead of them.
The Mercury brand is doing very well...stories of his early demise have been greatly exaggerated...and more of a wish per say, by his nemesis.
We need numbers, size and truth to battle the left...that's how he beat sorass early on and survived. The merger will make them both unbeatable with truth and reason as their weapon.
Personally, viewing the alternative media for 10 years now, This is an unbeatable combination.
Yes, it's a shame it is still spoken in a bicameral tongue.
Once you add humans to the mix AND you want peace and cooperation, about the only way I have ever seen is to adopt objectivist views on the nature of human beings. Its not that hard really. Socialism is much harder to figure out, and it doesnt even work.
This is where things get mucked up...Human Beings follow their nature based in their biology at the cellular level...Rand talks about that.
You've seen me reference this as: Rational 'Celf' interest.
Jordan Peterson talks about that too from a biological/Psychological perspective.
And, I may be explaining it differently but Rand Did reference mans nature, self interest is built in to the cells in our bodies, DNA and biological function...otherwise we could not reason nor think!
This is my Work, I've studied these things for more than 10 years.
I am Not going to have this argument again.
Carl, cells are not conscious and so cannot
have an interest, let alone a self interest. Perhaps you believe Dawkins' "The Selfish Gene", which is a metaphor reified into a fantasy world.
So, with a body built with celfish cells, the body and brain of the whole would function celfishly and just like the individual cells, once it's needs are met, the value/resources are passed on.
A conscious human body in good mental health would act similarly if not propagandized or coerced into doing differently.
"Human Beings" do not "follow their nature based in their biology at the cellular level." Proper choices are not automatic. Being born with the capacity for rational thought does not determine the degree to which it is used or the standards adopted for making choices. Morality is about formulating principles and acting on them, based on the standard for making choices in accordance with requirements for life -- not self interest "built into the cells in our bodies". Your assertions have nothing to do with Ayn Rand and show no understanding of her ideas.
The boy has his head on straight and is under attack just any of us that use objective reason.
Fox now is pretty much useless. I watch Levin, who is a good interviewer and has interesting guests, but I have to subtract out his useless religious crap. At least when he is interviewing, he shuts up and just tries to get the guests to talk.
I would have said Maxine waters is a straight shooter in the same way- one knows where she is at because she just says it plainly. I disagree with 99% of what she says, but at least she tells me straight up
Examples of persons who are not straight shooters are Obama, Pelosi, bush#2, Schumer, and Hillary. One has to disregard what they say and reformulate it based on what they do in order to determine what they were actually thunking
Evolution with in a species is self evident throughout history but there is not evolution between different species. [one cannot turn into another].
Hannity probably makes too much money from FOX to move over to a platform like this. Tucker Carlson is way too intellectually compromised for me, and why they have Juan Williams as the token black escapes me. Judge Jeanine is ok actually. Bill O'Reilly was their best commentator, but he is now more interesting than ever on his own youtube channel.
Since cellular level activity is not conscious activity, it acts regardless of consciousness. There is some evidence that a conscious awareness is preceded by the physical - chemical processes which begin an awareness in the subconscious brain. The physical body acts purely physically, i.e., structurally - chemically. Even acts might be too much of a stretch. It just is a chemical system made of proteins with structures for intakes and outlets for chemicals such as hormones, enzymes , and nutrients. There is no acting for survival, it just survives or not depending upon its environment and whether it has enough structure and needed energy producing substances from its environment to decrease its entropy to be a living thing.
A conscious person need not be propagandized or coerced to live contrary to his body's needs. It seems quite easy for a person to convince himself to act contrary to his body's needs. The body may even do so should it be unwell or get the wrong nutrients or environment.
All life is "Aware" of it's environment but NOT aware that it is aware.
The traditional definition of "Consciousness" is: aware of one's own awareness.
A better definition is Self Introspection...and there is nothing in the human head that has been identified to do that. [observe, inspect nor control one's own behavior, thoughts, desires or temptations beyond it's instinctive
survival needs]
http://www.fisme.science.uu.nl/tdb/fu...
(We speak of concepts, functions or how things work here or why say, A+B = C.
Now the meaning of words, terms or philosophical concepts have to be specific in order to derive understanding in it's context.
Metaphors enhance meaning and understanding. Everyone seems to respond to different metaphors based upon our different experiences and level of compartmentalized information. (specific neurons in the brain)
I am only half way through the pdf, amongst many distractions tonight but one error I spotted underscores the problem. My correction will be bracketed.
"To know is to represent accurately in one's head, [mind] what is outside [inside] the mind, [head]
Understanding can only occur in the mind, then and only then can a specific neuron be created in the brain that represents that understanding.
Let's take 2 neurons in the brain, one A and one B, but the answer to a problem is AB...that information is not represented, only through mistake, experimentation or learning can one know and hopefully understand AB, once known and or understood can a neuron AB be constructed representing the answer.
Demonstrated in the brief to my recollection, I knew the formula and could use it successfully "but I really didn't know what was going on".
That demonstrates compartmentalized information. His understanding came upon an insight...which could only occur in the mind.
(Nothing in the head has been found that can do that)
I may, after finishing, offer more.
Notice: written while tired and distracted, (may scrap and rewrite)...good night.
But I also follow several personalities who are on podcasts but will probably never be on cable. Lauren Southern, Sargon of Akkad, Scott Adams, and libertarian Tom Woods are in that category.
I'm surprised I'm not seeing any posts here about the yellow-vest protesters in France. They are right to protest but they have very wrong ideas about who is to blame and what to do about their problems -- delusions eerily similar to some people in Nuremberg 95 years ago.
Glenn's (the blaze) is up to date and CRTV's shows are Nov, 30th.