Fantastic! Love it!

I bet the left would put it on the air because it "feels good". Never mind the contents.

Well presented and enjoyable to watch. Unlikely to sway the socialist democrats and likely to anger and increase their ranks.

I didn't see anything funny about it at all. Everything she said is completely true. Very well done, I'm even forwarding the link, anonymously, to my democratic party "friends". I've set up a special email address for this purpose.

Two nits:
1. I would have said "record employment" instead of "record unemployment".
2. The scum who kicked the woman was in Canada
Other than that, spot on!

And she said all of that with a smile and straight face. No way could I have pulled this off.

With a little Ayn Rand editing, this text could be tucked somewhere in Atlas Shrugged.

Can't argue against anything she said...wish we could put that on TV!

Was that not a real ad?

Anyway, a comment on one of the themes, the difference between the two major political parties as described by James Delingpole in The Spectator UK, 17-June-2017:

One offers:
‘Free cake for all, but responsibly administered,
with due regard for calorie and sugar content’

The other offers:
‘Free cake — as much as you like, with cherries,
and flavours so delicious you’ll hardly believe they could exist’

He says obviously the young go with the no conditions offer.

spectator.com.au/2017/06/i-dont-blame...
(Corbyn is the UK equivalent of Sanders but more left. )

.#3 is the best case senerio. If the networks denied the ad, that should get a bunch of good free advertising, if it were publicly made known.

American “Capitalist” networks turns down $10 million because they cling to irrational socialist politics.

Great find, blarman !

While I agree with your spirit, it probably wouldn't work and might be a waste of scarce resources. First, Bad timing; the 2018 election would be over and the next would be 2 years away. Second, such an ad would be forgotten before the end of the game - except by those who already agree with limited government. Third, would the networks even accept such an ad? Fourth, if it was broadcast, the networks would probably allow an immediate idiotic response by socialists and the MSM would highlight that response and ridicule the conservative ad for weeks after the game. Network media is overpriced and losing ground to new media constantly. Using it is like fighting the terrorists with WW1 tactics.

We need at least $10 million to place a sixty second version of this type of ad on the air during the Super Bowl. I would invest some of my money toward this type of project.