Galt's Gulch

Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by chad 5 years, 5 months ago
    Well presented and enjoyable to watch. Unlikely to sway the socialist democrats and likely to anger and increase their ranks.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by NealS 5 years, 5 months ago
    I didn't see anything funny about it at all. Everything she said is completely true. Very well done, I'm even forwarding the link, anonymously, to my democratic party "friends". I've set up a special email address for this purpose.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by TheOldMan 5 years, 5 months ago
    Two nits:
    1. I would have said "record employment" instead of "record unemployment".
    2. The scum who kicked the woman was in Canada
    Other than that, spot on!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 5 years, 5 months ago
    Was that not a real ad?

    Anyway, a comment on one of the themes, the difference between the two major political parties as described by James Delingpole in The Spectator UK, 17-June-2017:

    One offers:
    ‘Free cake for all, but responsibly administered,
    with due regard for calorie and sugar content’

    The other offers:
    ‘Free cake — as much as you like, with cherries,
    and flavours so delicious you’ll hardly believe they could exist’

    He says obviously the young go with the no conditions offer.

    spectator.com.au/2017/06/i-dont-blame...
    (Corbyn is the UK equivalent of Sanders but more left. )
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    -
  • Posted by Solver 5 years, 5 months ago
    We need at least $10 million to place a sixty second version of this type of ad on the air during the Super Bowl. I would invest some of my money toward this type of project.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
      -
    • Posted by freedomforall 5 years, 5 months ago
      While I agree with your spirit, it probably wouldn't work and might be a waste of scarce resources. First, Bad timing; the 2018 election would be over and the next would be 2 years away. Second, such an ad would be forgotten before the end of the game - except by those who already agree with limited government. Third, would the networks even accept such an ad? Fourth, if it was broadcast, the networks would probably allow an immediate idiotic response by socialists and the MSM would highlight that response and ridicule the conservative ad for weeks after the game. Network media is overpriced and losing ground to new media constantly. Using it is like fighting the terrorists with WW1 tactics.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Solver 5 years, 5 months ago
        .#3 is the best case senerio. If the networks denied the ad, that should get a bunch of good free advertising, if it were publicly made known.

        American “Capitalist” networks turns down $10 million because they cling to irrational socialist politics.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo