Not free speech, not free market and rules enforcement are subjective.
Here is the full transcript mentioned in the video. It will probably become another historical case study of leftist doublespeak.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U...
The video,
https://youtu.be/Hv7hvZee-PQ
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U...
The video,
https://youtu.be/Hv7hvZee-PQ
And this is happening now!
#patreonpurge
Patreon has become a politically bent rule breaking business that hosts many content creators and is a middleman for their financial livelihoods.
Way too much information about this to keep repeating it.
https://youtu.be/UKSkyfQzYpI
https://youtu.be/nJkcGMUkeIw
https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/post...
“I fear we‘re seeing some plan to reestablish the former power of the Gated Institutional Narrative well above Patreon’s paygrade using payment networks. I hope this is wrong. But if it‘s correct, “improper” bitcoin transactions will start to carry serious criminal penalties.”
- Eric Weinstein 12/25/2018
Patreon Purge: Bankers are the Global Speech Police
https://thelibertarianrepublic.com/pa...
“The problem with what’s going on currently with online deplatforming is certain ‘wrongthinkers’ aren’t just being kicked off websites like Patreon, but competitors are also being stifled. I support a right to refuse service – I do not support meddling in someone else’s business when they are refused service and move elsewhere.”
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/d...
(BTW, historically much of this is a lie)
“Patreon takes a highly personal approach to policing speech. While Google and Facebook use algorithms as a first line of defense for questionable content, Patreon has human moderators. They give warnings and reach out to talk to offenders, presenting options for “education” and “reform.” Some activists hope this will become a model for a better and kinder internet.”
“If someone has breached Patreon’s policy, the company contacts the offender with a specific plan, which usually involves asking for the content to be removed and for a public apology.
The conversations with creators can quickly become complicated, nuanced, and, well, human, she said. Among other challenges, Patreon has to decide what qualifies as a sincere and thorough apology. Still, having human moderators has changed its users’ behaviors more than simply deleting accounts would, Ms. Hart said.
We hand-hold creators, and we work with them one on one, and nearly every creator reforms — and so it’s quite a successful process,” she said.”
-New York Times - Dec 24, 2018
https://youtu.be/DpdnzWV3sYI
Merry Christmas!
Not “my way of thinking.”
Yes he was. That was absolutely wrong.
Not at all.
Did you disagree with any of the arguments in the video?
Load more comments...