Not free speech, not free market and rules enforcement are subjective.
Here is the full transcript mentioned in the video. It will probably become another historical case study of leftist doublespeak.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U...
The video,
https://youtu.be/Hv7hvZee-PQ
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U...
The video,
https://youtu.be/Hv7hvZee-PQ
SOURCE URL: https://youtu.be/Hv7hvZee-PQ
Mob rule or what is also called democracy is what the founders of our country intended to keep at bay,when they formed this republic. In fact the founders saw democracy as a dirty word. The founders intent was to protect the individual not to allow the majority to steamroll over the unaffiliated.
https://youtu.be/UKSkyfQzYpI
#patreonpurge
Patreon has become a politically bent rule breaking business that hosts many content creators and is a middleman for their financial livelihoods.
Way too much information about this to keep repeating it.
And this is happening now!
Patreon is following the motto "get woke go BROKE" #PatreonPurge
https://youtu.be/DpdnzWV3sYI
Merry Christmas!
Patreon has also banned someone, not for what he said on Patreon's site, but what he said elsewhere, and taking statements elsewhere out of context as described by enemies of the person without any rational, unbiased consideration by Patreon.
Patreon has repeatedly avoided responding to the issues while trying to tell other customers that they would not likely treat them the same way.
First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
I agree with your free market thinking and hope that Patreon has destroyed their credibility permanently, and that they receive just desserts for irrational treatment of their customers.
The topic is based on three primary points argued in the video. Did you disagree with any of the arguments in the video?
Not “my way of thinking.”
Yes he was. That was absolutely wrong.
Not at all.
Did you disagree with any of the arguments in the video?
Whatever the law does or doesn't say about it, this "deplatforming" movement is vicious and needs to be destroyed. I believe we have reached the time when getting the perpetrators fired by their employers and kicked out by their landlords (as they are already doing to their victims) is both called-for and necessary in self-defense.
What is "free speech up to a point"?
It is either free or not. She decides what that point is, right? The point where the left disagrees.
Patreon Purge: Bankers are the Global Speech Police
https://thelibertarianrepublic.com/pa...
“The problem with what’s going on currently with online deplatforming is certain ‘wrongthinkers’ aren’t just being kicked off websites like Patreon, but competitors are also being stifled. I support a right to refuse service – I do not support meddling in someone else’s business when they are refused service and move elsewhere.”
https://twitter.com/keikoinboston/sta...
https://youtu.be/ehZnho7gTws
#patreonpurge
https://youtu.be/nJkcGMUkeIw
https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/post...
“I fear we‘re seeing some plan to reestablish the former power of the Gated Institutional Narrative well above Patreon’s paygrade using payment networks. I hope this is wrong. But if it‘s correct, “improper” bitcoin transactions will start to carry serious criminal penalties.”
- Eric Weinstein 12/25/2018
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/d...
(BTW, historically much of this is a lie)
“Patreon takes a highly personal approach to policing speech. While Google and Facebook use algorithms as a first line of defense for questionable content, Patreon has human moderators. They give warnings and reach out to talk to offenders, presenting options for “education” and “reform.” Some activists hope this will become a model for a better and kinder internet.”
“If someone has breached Patreon’s policy, the company contacts the offender with a specific plan, which usually involves asking for the content to be removed and for a public apology.
The conversations with creators can quickly become complicated, nuanced, and, well, human, she said. Among other challenges, Patreon has to decide what qualifies as a sincere and thorough apology. Still, having human moderators has changed its users’ behaviors more than simply deleting accounts would, Ms. Hart said.
We hand-hold creators, and we work with them one on one, and nearly every creator reforms — and so it’s quite a successful process,” she said.”
-New York Times - Dec 24, 2018