I was at one of Warren's fundraisers a year ago. I haven't been to a Clinton event since 2008, and I think she's irrelevant b/c of her age. As I read the article linked to this post, more and more I do not care. Even if I contributed loads of money and got to know every staffer, which I surely do not want to do, I don't think I could move the needle much.

I remember that Warren event because like my wife she's an attorney who taught law and who had a solo practice focused on estate planning and real estate. We ended up just networking with people in our industries and never talked to Warren. We were kind of down when we left because Warren's story is so much like my wife's, but Warren's up there selling socialism to an audience making business contacts, i.e. generating the taxes that make those promises possible. People who send a third or more of what they make donate their money to be spent riling up people who mostly pay no income taxes about how they'll spend our taxes.

I went to a more recent fundraiser for Harris. I thought she was a better speaker. She's like I imagine Reagan or Bill Clinton, would have been to meet in person. They remember names, seem interested and interesting, just great politicians. That's great for Harris, but I don't care.

I'm pretty disillusioned. I used to be thrilled if I lobbied them successfully on some minor issue, but it just doesn't move the needle enough to be worthwhile. I believe there's a deeper structural problem of the very definition of the role of gov't, and no one's even mentioning it.

Hilary is a has been. She would be able to get nothing done as no one would really fear her or love her.

Warren is scary should she win. She would have a great deal of support, and she is a true believer in the collectivist plan. She is seen as an up and comer rather than a has been which with the libs is all important.

Had a horrible thought—What if one became President and the other one became Vice President?

Hillary

Why would anyone, who can think, vote for (1) anyone from Taxachusetts for any office outside that state, or (2) for someone who supports a ideology that has always failed in practice?

Universal suffrage is a very bad idea.

Elizabeth... hands down. She is a TRUE socialist. Hillary is just self-serving and will do and say whatever is popular to gain power. Warren is a true believer. She, like Ocasio-Cortez, is anti-business, anti-American, anti-free enterprise. With the "free" press to spread her ideology, she can destroy this country very easily.

Don't know solver...might be a tie but in totally different ways.
Warren is just lookin for another feather in her head so she can muster up enough indian heritage to be called pokerherhontas legitimately...

The evil hag because destroying America is what she did as SOS ,She was selling out our country to any and all who contributed to her families piggy bank the CF or CGI.
Pocahontas is just a cheater, using her made up heritage to gain advantage at Harvard and with the minority’s . Her evil anti capitalism pales in comparison to The evil witch’s murderous ways.