No, the one's they found dated 12/15K years ago and older,..and that was dated via depth of the earth they were found. Also very large depressions like the city sized one the satellites found under Greenland's glazier...core samples taken.

Remember, when the sun goes micro nova, amongst it's ejecta are large chunks of metal. Reminisce of these metal objects have been analyzed as well.
Meteorites would not have tektites with no air bubbles, nor in the craters made by them.

Also, We are still in the vetting process. Ben will have other qualified quests speaking about this at the Observing the Frontier conference in NM. this Feb.

Have any of those tektites been shown to be dated other than the dates of the known strewn fields from meteorite impacts? If not, then they are formed as the result of solidifying in space and falling back to Earth and not due to any kind of solar nova.

The cycle is undeniable. I am with you on the timeline numerology though....we are still vetting this out.
The finding of many areas on earth, the moon and mars that have these glass beads with no air bubbles is telling.
Also, everything I have studied shows me a timeline of 12K years for the last major disaster and it make sense in view of the procession of the equinox.
see: info graphics I posted in the commentary section.

NASA scientist have found that normal stars like ours, in fact almost all stars, put out micro novas [a new designation].

Conspiracy theory with some numerology.
Odd that he has no easily found credentials, only a lot of books that he sells.

Part VIII https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cm_ps...

I agree with all of that...

If we go by history...they are probably wrong and will make things worse.
We really have no idea...because they are not sharing what they know and exactly what they Think they are doing.

Putting stuff in the atmosphere still doesn't protect us from the solid ejecta which creates real problems.

Change will occur regardless and it should IMO, but the idea is to make it less painful with a better chance of survival...keeping only those things that are of value instead of a total reboot.

That's exactly why I asked about things being added to our atmosphere...it has to be for a greater purpose :).

I re-listened and caught some more stuff. Looks like, due to frequency matches between earth and sun, the magnetic reversal and the nova events ARE connected.
My thoughts...is there a way to speed up or slow down the reversal so that both events Won't happen at the same time? Sounds far fetched but another thought, and it goes back to my observation that if we can make a hologram with solidity, then we can create a force field.
Could we make this force field to: 1 protect the earth from the solid ejecta, and 2 might we be able to slow down the solar rays, gamma rays etc, to slow down the evolutionary or de-evolutionary effects of life on the planet.
Might we be able to slow down and possibly avoid a full on ice age at the same time.

There is something he mentioned about aluminum...is it connected to the government putting aluminum in our atmosphere?
Have to re-listen again...

I watched all of them :). The video posted below, It may be some time till I can watch the whole thing.
and yes this is a serious matter.

Yes, as Dob points out, they are being observed.
One star observed has a micro nova once every year, (in it's time) as reported in today's SO news.

https://youtu.be/bMr-5HHnAmU

https://youtu.be/bMr-5HHnAmU

Most repeating Nova Discovered. Timely
question.https://youtu.be/fWxe3JVxcZQ

Unless the tektites date for other than the dates of the strewn fields, they are all from asteroid impacts. I have never seen data that that is not the case. So those little beads are not necessarily made in space. There are about 16 million G dwarf stars with masses near that of the Sun out of the about 400 billion stars in the Milky Way, so there should be a large number of micro nova when ever the Milky Way is observed. Is that what is being observed?

I, with any luck, will be hand splitting wood because it's freezing cold. at the age of 93.

And seriously, this is a serious matter, BUT, we still don't have all the answers, all the facts, not to mention, most of which we may not have answers to.
All we can do is prepare for the worst...which is why, besides the lie, We are really upset because the climate narrative has everyone looking in the opposite directions.

PS...linls to videos 6 and 7 have been posted, Ben figures on 3 more in the future.

Thanks for responding to my questions. I've been reading posts on these forums for the past 5 or so years and I don't post much. I've always enjoyed your posts and comments and typically you are spot on. This particular topic caught my interest, I'll be in my mid 70's around the time this could occur. Sipping tea on the front porch looking at the show till the blast takes us/me out.

You can do Nothing, to our atmosphere to lessen the impact of a micro nova. Even if we could strengthen our magnetic shields and our ionosphere, it would still not do anything. I might argue the opposite, trying to do something to our atmosphere would only make a host of matters worse.
Problem: Only a force field could protect the planet from the Large metallic eject that accompanies the hot electrically charged plasma.

To make you feel better, we have yet to account for everything else that is going on nor those things that will be going on in 2046.

Example: I think the Grand Solar Minimum and it's "Sun facing quiet" that keeps the sunspots for flaring when facing earth may, at best, mitigate the worst of the effects of a micro nova event.

Olduglycarl, do you think by adding anything to our atmosphere to lessen the impact that a micro nova event could cause, or would that not really do anything to stop or lessen the impact. What do you think that those in government that knows about this has done to protect at least a few (when in comparison to total world population)...

Data is constantly changing as our understand grows more accurate. Our view of all things is evolving as it should.
keep up to date by watching http://suspicious0bservers.org and you will see. Also see, the thunderbolts project (electric universe, that will change soon to a plasma universe)
Look up sky scholar on youtube as well.

This post however is still in the vetting stage. No question though as to our sun producing micro nova events...the rest is being vetted. We have to account for many things and many cycles.

PS...just posted video #7

First video is way off. The Sun's rotation speed is 24 days and the core's rotation rate is about 24/4= 6 days. The core's rotation rate is about 1.9 microhertz and not 430 nanohertz.
The journal, "Progress in Physics", does not necessarily publish good papers. They are very open to papers that contradict known physics as from this about the journal. I have been at science for good 60 years of my life and have read many papers contrary to the then contemporary science knowledge and am appalled about the amount of clap-trap speculation since the YouTube videos which are in no way about objective reality. They, in many cases, are just subjective opinions about one's mental beliefs. About the Journal's paranoia about modern scientific knowledge :

"Owing to furtive jealousy and vested interest, modern science abhors open discussion and wilfully banishes those scientists who question the orthodox views. Very often, scientists of outstanding ability, who point out deficiencies in current theory or interpretation of data, are labelled as crackpots, so that their views can be conveniently ignored."
Perhaps crackpots and cranks should be labelled as such.

In the second video, he does not seem to understand what a surface is. Liquids have poorly defined surfaces without being stable. The fluid surface of the oceans need not be stable to produce rotating pressure areas, just as the Sun does not need a stable surface to produce many different phenomenon. The Sun has many surface features such as sunspots that are produced electromagnetically in a gas, mainly a plasma, confined by gravitation.

I do not understand why a man who is proficient in radiology ends up trying to debunk physics.

Here, listen to Dr. Robitaille
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bQ1z...
You are correct Liquid Metallic Hydrogen III.

Here is about the surface. ( didn't mean to say solid) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faywr...

Reference for your last paragraph? Metalized hydrogen just indicates, if it does exist, that it has metallic properties and need not be a solid, e.g. mercury. A solid surface is not necessary for ejecting particles, e.g., radioactive isotopes even gaseous ones. As for the Sun, ejection of material as in CMEs are due to magnetic fields.

NOTICE: just posted an info graphic time line of past disaster events along the precession of the equinox.
It's a little hard to read. If anyone can improve it, please do and let me know, I'll send you my email so I can post it.

I think the forward was written early on and before it was published in 58 but I will put that one on my list of things to check out...thanks Mike.
By the way, I am not fully on board with the theory and tend to view it electrically and the events he is referring to could easily be due to the nova events we are now discussing.

However, the displacement theory isn't connected to the sun going micro nova...did you see the new info graphic I posted?

The biggest problems I have been working on with Ben at SO and others is: are the magnetic reversals and the micro nova events connected or as one would expect, normally happen at different times. Will they occur at the same time this time or will it be a 1,2 punch...or, as it is suspected to happen before in history, will the poles just go back to where they belong without reversing.
The other mitigating factor not accounted for is the Grand Solar Minimum and what we call the earth facing quietness where sunspots do not flair until the reach the limb away from earth.

PS...just posted part 6