Repeatable World disaster Cycle found. [do not judge till you listen] Parts 1-9

Posted by $ Olduglycarl 6 years, 11 months ago to Science
72 comments | Share | Flag

Was CIA classified, They took it seriously, should we at least consider the possibilities?

This first video is 25 Minutes long. part II and III are less than 7 minutes.

CAUTION: this will take some time to vet out, nevermind understand, it is jarring.

This is quite the revelation, unbelievable yet undeniable. NASA and others have recently noticed that some stars go nova on a cyclical time frame and do not die out. Ben at suspicious observers has reported this in his daily news casts.

NOTE!...This is what the CIA and Scientist think on the subject. Ben Davidson and other investigators are working hard to best understand this new information and vet it as best we can.
It is so credible that Ben is scheduling a guest speaker, most familiar with the subject, for the next Observing the Frontier conference.
http://suspicious0bservers.org.

Part II Earth Catastrophe Cycle | Stories to Tell: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Cje2...

Part III Earth Catastrophe Cycle | $21 Trillion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qy99G...

Part IV https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTUJ7...

Part V https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vKwu...

Part VI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpvQc...

Part VII https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXU0c...

Part VIII https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cm_ps...

Part IX https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgJ4z...

All Comments

Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 6 years, 11 months ago
    At the 7:35 mark: "Professor Charles Hapgood promulgated the Earth's Crust Displacement Theory in 1958. That work was supported by Einstein for which he wrote a foreword." Einstein died in 1955.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 6 years, 11 months ago
    New parts posted in commentary. we now have 6 parts to this discussion.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, there is evidence, one of which are the tiny glass beads with no air bubbles in them. They could of only been made that way in outer space. They are found around many craters on earth, the mood and mars. There is other date given in the videos.

    There is a lot of material in these videos and a lot of it is new to us. I myself find that I want to relisten to them all over again to get the finer points that I may have missed.
    Some speculate that we did have a companion star at one point by no one knows for sure.

    The new info graphic I posted comes from Nasa observations of other stars like ours, they do repeatably have micro nova events. The data in the graphic puts it in perspective.

    Don't know about you but this stuff fascinates me.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The cycles can, have and are understood scientifically. Like anything you start of with history, data, statistical correlation and then figure out the particulars with more data, observations, lab and model testing...although it is rare that "modeling" is accurate and should always account for new information.

    Problem is that the assumptions made in the past are wrong, that's ok because we learned something but now it's time to rethink and discard the old models.
    For instance, many still assume the sun has no surface...well it turns out it does and seems to be made of metalized hydrogen. A solid surface is necessary in the process of ejecting particles, without it, the sun could not "Throw" anything at us.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by lrshultis 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Any evidence that the Sun has ever gone nova? As far as I know the Sun has never had a companion star. If I recall right, all are binary systems with two red dwarfs or a white dwarf and another star.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The side that is hit with ejecta has its atmosphere blown away. as the opposite sides atmosphere rushes to fill it in EveryThing is flash frozen.
    Boyle’s law. Rapidly expanding gas freezes.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Did you see the new info graphic I added to the post?
    Shows the new categorizations going forward.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by lrshultis 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    A star gone nova never disappears and remains the same type of star. Different from a supernova where the star becomes a neuron star or black hole.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    12K does go into 60 evenly...62K is not a far stretch to put it into the cycle...they are missing all the other times, because they don't know or because they don't what you to know.
    Think...there is no data to suggest that every nova event achieved the same disaster level.

    I am pinning that observation, that thought, into my mitigating factors for the next nova event.

    PS, I posted an info graphic on the different strengths of nova and nova like events and what is expected of each.
    Just click on the little photo in the commentary section of the post.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The Mitochondrial Eve data suggests humans have been around on Earth for at least 140-200,000 years. A mass extinction event of some kind may have accounted for it, but then it does not seem to fit into a world where the oceans race across the earth at 1000 miles an hour, every 12000 years. It seems this is still not connecting all the data together.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitocho...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I posted this in the other thread as well, there are some interesting things in this, they seem to support the idea of a mass extinction event, but not as nuclear as the mini nova currently supposes. There seems tobe some inconsistencies to resolve, although the basic premise of a large extinction event is very solid, given the evidence, and the mini nova idea does explain the instant freezing and how herds of possibly millions of woolly mammoths all fell over dead at once:

    https://youtu.be/5jVZKw521HU

    Could the mini Nova cycle be the 62 million year mass extinction event, and the event 12000 years ago be a polar flip? Even then, an impactor would also cause something drastic, but does it explain the instant freezing of the carcasses?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I have been trying to figure that out, it might this time or we might get hit with a double wammy; first one then the other.
    I think we've had more reversals than we have had novas.
    2046 might be a whole different story...

    PS adding another video from Ben.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Good question, Nick...one inwhich I asked sat on Fly on the Wall...haven't got a definitive answer.

    I don't think these events always happen at the same time...hell, we don't know, for sure, if it will this time either.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And, does the polar magnets move and flip at the same time, that was unclear, because they are wandering around more...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Well, the sun facing side gets wiped out and the other side suffers from darkness for a period of time and I would imagine a lot of cloud cover for an extended period of time...if that is correct...so much for the solar panels.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The actual event happens in one day, (provided we understand it correctly and have the science right)...The consequences though, last a long time.

    In looking at this some more, it seems, perhaps, that the wind and wave actions alluded to would be at it's worse along the equator...so anywhere well inland, away from flooding areas might be safe as well.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    True, You need people with real life skills, integrated knowledge and a work ethic...that leaves out the [D]elite ruleless class but instead includes the elite on the street and to hell with the Great Unwashed.

    I was looking at maps of the US by elevation...there is a very large plateau in Colorado that could support a Lot of people at 11K feet elevation...New Gulch?...anyone....Provided,..that area is not on the sun facing side during the event.

    I can't help feeling that we haven't considered all the cycles that are or will be happening at that time...do we know how that effects the outcome?
    I don't know...maybe I am just to damn integrated and want more defined realities of the situation.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo