Repeatable World disaster Cycle found. [do not judge till you listen] Parts 1-9
Was CIA classified, They took it seriously, should we at least consider the possibilities?
This first video is 25 Minutes long. part II and III are less than 7 minutes.
CAUTION: this will take some time to vet out, nevermind understand, it is jarring.
This is quite the revelation, unbelievable yet undeniable. NASA and others have recently noticed that some stars go nova on a cyclical time frame and do not die out. Ben at suspicious observers has reported this in his daily news casts.
NOTE!...This is what the CIA and Scientist think on the subject. Ben Davidson and other investigators are working hard to best understand this new information and vet it as best we can.
It is so credible that Ben is scheduling a guest speaker, most familiar with the subject, for the next Observing the Frontier conference.
http://suspicious0bservers.org.
Part II Earth Catastrophe Cycle | Stories to Tell: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Cje2...
Part III Earth Catastrophe Cycle | $21 Trillion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qy99G...
Part IV https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTUJ7...
Part V https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vKwu...
Part VI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpvQc...
Part VII https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXU0c...
Part VIII https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cm_ps...
Part IX https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgJ4z...
This first video is 25 Minutes long. part II and III are less than 7 minutes.
CAUTION: this will take some time to vet out, nevermind understand, it is jarring.
This is quite the revelation, unbelievable yet undeniable. NASA and others have recently noticed that some stars go nova on a cyclical time frame and do not die out. Ben at suspicious observers has reported this in his daily news casts.
NOTE!...This is what the CIA and Scientist think on the subject. Ben Davidson and other investigators are working hard to best understand this new information and vet it as best we can.
It is so credible that Ben is scheduling a guest speaker, most familiar with the subject, for the next Observing the Frontier conference.
http://suspicious0bservers.org.
Part II Earth Catastrophe Cycle | Stories to Tell: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Cje2...
Part III Earth Catastrophe Cycle | $21 Trillion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qy99G...
Part IV https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTUJ7...
Part V https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vKwu...
Part VI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpvQc...
Part VII https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXU0c...
Part VIII https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cm_ps...
Part IX https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgJ4z...
As mentioned...we have a lot of questions.
The only certainty is that it has happened in the past, reliably, (IF we understand the data correctly) every 12000 years and that would bring us to 2046...10 years after the height of the Grand Solar Minimum.
PS...the past two days news from (same page as the links,) suspicious0bservers youtube has shown, using NASA resources and measurements just how the coronal hole stream blew out transformers and transmission lines from NY to Oregon...today's news showed the transmission lines in North Carolina exploding like a Tesla invention!
here is the link for the guy/ Diehold foundation that Ben references first, he and the foundation has collected all this info and history...he skips around a bit but it 's worth a watch when your bored and have the time.
It's a lot to take in...
Shows the new categorizations going forward.
I was looking at maps of the US by elevation...there is a very large plateau in Colorado that could support a Lot of people at 11K feet elevation...New Gulch?...anyone....Provided,..that area is not on the sun facing side during the event.
I can't help feeling that we haven't considered all the cycles that are or will be happening at that time...do we know how that effects the outcome?
I don't know...maybe I am just to damn integrated and want more defined realities of the situation.
Here is a interesting personal factoid: 1957/1958 our house mysteriously burnt down, my little sister was born with heart defects and a host of other strange things...I remember the colors in the sky. I had forgotten them until it was mentioned.
I laid out some questions in yesterdays suspicious observers fly on the wall session.
1) will the grand solar minimum, said to be at it's height 2030-35, mitigate the overall effects of a micro nova. (I didn't like the answer pending) however, it might be a cycle that doesn't happen at the same time. (still think that the Mayan's were alluding to something like that)
2) do these micro nova's always happen during magnetic reversals. If so, how much worse could it get...we don't know the answer to that.
3) and, can we predict which side of the earth will face the sun on D day.
These are the questions we must answer, pending the outcome of our vetting this out.
Interesting thought did arise though. Has to do with Jupiter, some ancient revelations as to the sun's connection to a much closer Jupiter but a Jupiter that is much further out now...we rhetorically ask...might that cancel out the cycle?
We will be discussing this a lot more. Ben has added more speakers, in this regard, to the Observing the frontier conference in a few months.
Wishing I could go to New Mexico for the conference...don't know how I could possible swing that.
Assembling, all known knowledge, past and present, all technology
Tried Wikipedia -that turned out to be manipulated by collectivists and alarmists.
ancient revelations. Don't knock it. Those guys (pardon sexism) got better predictions than the inter planetary carbon conflagration who predict disasters, famines, floods and droughts from carbon. I'll bet more on the Mayans.
I do have one criticism, this thread is just too impotant to be classified under Science.
TheScience, as they call it, seizes on carbon as the cause of, well all that is bad (outside of capitalism/racism), and ignores solar cycles.
Periodic changes, yes cycles, in solar radiation have been used in temperature models with some fair correlation with actual data. The alarmist models using only CO2 all have bad correlation.
That reminds me- a piece of ancient wisdom I like:
When we talk of the future, the gods laugh
Old Chinese proverb.
That could be the only kernel of truth in the GW tale.
Boyle’s law. Rapidly expanding gas freezes.
Problem is that the assumptions made in the past are wrong, that's ok because we learned something but now it's time to rethink and discard the old models.
For instance, many still assume the sun has no surface...well it turns out it does and seems to be made of metalized hydrogen. A solid surface is necessary in the process of ejecting particles, without it, the sun could not "Throw" anything at us.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bQ1z...
You are correct Liquid Metallic Hydrogen III.
Here is about the surface. ( didn't mean to say solid) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faywr...
The journal, "Progress in Physics", does not necessarily publish good papers. They are very open to papers that contradict known physics as from this about the journal. I have been at science for good 60 years of my life and have read many papers contrary to the then contemporary science knowledge and am appalled about the amount of clap-trap speculation since the YouTube videos which are in no way about objective reality. They, in many cases, are just subjective opinions about one's mental beliefs. About the Journal's paranoia about modern scientific knowledge :
"Owing to furtive jealousy and vested interest, modern science abhors open discussion and wilfully banishes those scientists who question the orthodox views. Very often, scientists of outstanding ability, who point out deficiencies in current theory or interpretation of data, are labelled as crackpots, so that their views can be conveniently ignored."
Perhaps crackpots and cranks should be labelled as such.
In the second video, he does not seem to understand what a surface is. Liquids have poorly defined surfaces without being stable. The fluid surface of the oceans need not be stable to produce rotating pressure areas, just as the Sun does not need a stable surface to produce many different phenomenon. The Sun has many surface features such as sunspots that are produced electromagnetically in a gas, mainly a plasma, confined by gravitation.
I do not understand why a man who is proficient in radiology ends up trying to debunk physics.
Odd that he has no easily found credentials, only a lot of books that he sells.
The finding of many areas on earth, the moon and mars that have these glass beads with no air bubbles is telling.
Also, everything I have studied shows me a timeline of 12K years for the last major disaster and it make sense in view of the procession of the equinox.
see: info graphics I posted in the commentary section.
NASA scientist have found that normal stars like ours, in fact almost all stars, put out micro novas [a new designation].
Remember, when the sun goes micro nova, amongst it's ejecta are large chunks of metal. Reminisce of these metal objects have been analyzed as well.
Meteorites would not have tektites with no air bubbles, nor in the craters made by them.
Also, We are still in the vetting process. Ben will have other qualified quests speaking about this at the Observing the Frontier conference in NM. this Feb.
keep up to date by watching http://suspicious0bservers.org and you will see. Also see, the thunderbolts project (electric universe, that will change soon to a plasma universe)
Look up sky scholar on youtube as well.
This post however is still in the vetting stage. No question though as to our sun producing micro nova events...the rest is being vetted. We have to account for many things and many cycles.
PS...just posted video #7
Problem: Only a force field could protect the planet from the Large metallic eject that accompanies the hot electrically charged plasma.
To make you feel better, we have yet to account for everything else that is going on nor those things that will be going on in 2046.
Example: I think the Grand Solar Minimum and it's "Sun facing quiet" that keeps the sunspots for flaring when facing earth may, at best, mitigate the worst of the effects of a micro nova event.
My thoughts...is there a way to speed up or slow down the reversal so that both events Won't happen at the same time? Sounds far fetched but another thought, and it goes back to my observation that if we can make a hologram with solidity, then we can create a force field.
Could we make this force field to: 1 protect the earth from the solid ejecta, and 2 might we be able to slow down the solar rays, gamma rays etc, to slow down the evolutionary or de-evolutionary effects of life on the planet.
Might we be able to slow down and possibly avoid a full on ice age at the same time.
There is something he mentioned about aluminum...is it connected to the government putting aluminum in our atmosphere?
Have to re-listen again...
We really have no idea...because they are not sharing what they know and exactly what they Think they are doing.
Putting stuff in the atmosphere still doesn't protect us from the solid ejecta which creates real problems.
Change will occur regardless and it should IMO, but the idea is to make it less painful with a better chance of survival...keeping only those things that are of value instead of a total reboot.
And seriously, this is a serious matter, BUT, we still don't have all the answers, all the facts, not to mention, most of which we may not have answers to.
All we can do is prepare for the worst...which is why, besides the lie, We are really upset because the climate narrative has everyone looking in the opposite directions.
PS...linls to videos 6 and 7 have been posted, Ben figures on 3 more in the future.
and yes this is a serious matter.
In looking at this some more, it seems, perhaps, that the wind and wave actions alluded to would be at it's worse along the equator...so anywhere well inland, away from flooding areas might be safe as well.
I think we've had more reversals than we have had novas.
2046 might be a whole different story...
PS adding another video from Ben.
There is a lot of material in these videos and a lot of it is new to us. I myself find that I want to relisten to them all over again to get the finer points that I may have missed.
Some speculate that we did have a companion star at one point by no one knows for sure.
The new info graphic I posted comes from Nasa observations of other stars like ours, they do repeatably have micro nova events. The data in the graphic puts it in perspective.
Don't know about you but this stuff fascinates me.
question.https://youtu.be/fWxe3JVxcZQ
One star observed has a micro nova once every year, (in it's time) as reported in today's SO news.
I don't think these events always happen at the same time...hell, we don't know, for sure, if it will this time either.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitocho...
https://youtu.be/5jVZKw521HU
Could the mini Nova cycle be the 62 million year mass extinction event, and the event 12000 years ago be a polar flip? Even then, an impactor would also cause something drastic, but does it explain the instant freezing of the carcasses?
Think...there is no data to suggest that every nova event achieved the same disaster level.
I am pinning that observation, that thought, into my mitigating factors for the next nova event.
PS, I posted an info graphic on the different strengths of nova and nova like events and what is expected of each.
Just click on the little photo in the commentary section of the post.
It will be posted in the commentary too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpvQc...
It's a little hard to read. If anyone can improve it, please do and let me know, I'll send you my email so I can post it.
By the way, I am not fully on board with the theory and tend to view it electrically and the events he is referring to could easily be due to the nova events we are now discussing.
However, the displacement theory isn't connected to the sun going micro nova...did you see the new info graphic I posted?
The biggest problems I have been working on with Ben at SO and others is: are the magnetic reversals and the micro nova events connected or as one would expect, normally happen at different times. Will they occur at the same time this time or will it be a 1,2 punch...or, as it is suspected to happen before in history, will the poles just go back to where they belong without reversing.
The other mitigating factor not accounted for is the Grand Solar Minimum and what we call the earth facing quietness where sunspots do not flair until the reach the limb away from earth.
PS...just posted part 6
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.c...
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science...
http://news.mit.edu/2019/study-regula... (they got this one a bit wrong, tilt happens over a longer period of time and is a function of the procession of the equinox- no 20K year cycles)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.00404.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vKwu...
Bradley E. Schaefer
NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center
Received 1988 February 1; accepted 1988 July 29
http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cg...