Motives for the House intelligence panel report on Benghazi

Posted by  $  Dobrien 1 month, 1 week ago to History
15 comments | Share | Flag

The Hussein Admin could not have engaged in such anti-American activities with out the Jackass party and allies in the Republican Party. Thankfully many are resigning. Here is an example of Cover your ass. Sickening really.
SOURCE URL: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/11/22/the-motives-behind-the-november-rogersruppersberger-house-intelligence-panel-report-on-benghazi/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by  $  exceller 1 month, 1 week ago
    McConnell was part of this?

    That explains his total lack of control over the party.

    If the right would stick together and represent only one thing, the interest of the American people and would not be borderline traitors, this country would be the strongest in the world.

    All the more reason to back the president who is the only one with a clear head.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  1 month, 1 week ago
      McConmman and Boehner are the epitome of the more dangerous than Dems , RINO’s.
      They subvert much in a stealthy fashion.
      With the Dems you know what you are getting.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by  $  Olduglycarl 1 month, 1 week ago
        This is where "Progressivism" infiltrated the Republican party...ie Communism as outlined in: The Naked Communist, circa 1958. It didn't have to be pervasive, only a chosen few because with the demoncraps it became ubiquitous.

        PS...I never trusted lawyer speak.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by  $  exceller 1 month, 1 week ago
        Agree with you: these clowns are more dangerous because they hide under the "Republican" label.

        Remember the shooting of a young woman in San Francisco by a Mexican illegal, who was deported five times but managed to sneak back every time? O'Reilly was covering that event extensively as they tried to pass "Steinle's Law" afterwards.

        The reason it was not passed because McConnell said they could not pass it. No reason was given.

        He has been a sneaky character for a long time. I give him credit for managing the confirmation of Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, although I think Grassley has done much more than he to make it happen. McConnell had no idea if Kavanaugh would be confirmed only after voting was done. What kind of Majority leader is he?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  mshupe 1 month, 1 week ago
      What is the right? I suggest if only the ethical would stick together. The right, to me, is a term that can mean anarchy, or religious conservative, or fascist, or whatever. I'm only trying to reframe the lingo.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by  $  exceller 1 month, 1 week ago
        It is noteworthy that you think the right embodies anarchy or fascism.

        That is not what I have seen in the political world for a long time. It is puzzling to me that you think it is the right embodying these phenomena. I am not making the right innocent of these trends, but if you think the left has no role in the recent upheaval, then I don't know what you are looking at.

        How do you reframe the left, pray?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by  $  mshupe 1 month, 1 week ago
          Thanks, great post. I do not think fascism is right wing at all, the progressive left put it there to distance themselves from the defeated powers of WWII. Regarding anarchy, it is far right in terms of Aristotle's model of excess and defect, in terms of government. In that model virtue is the center, and in the government case, that would be Republicanism and Capitalism. As far as the left, that is easier to define, at least for me, and they have everything to do with chaos, upheaval, irrationality, etic.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by BCRinFremont 1 month, 1 week ago
            “...chaos, upheaval, irrationality, etc.”. It is probably no accident that the Latin etymology for the word ‘sinister” is “left.” The Old French of the 1400s more precisely defined “sinister” as “contrary, false, unfavorable, to the left.” Our current sinister Leftism is definitely prompted by malice, ill will, and intent to mislead. *etymonline.com.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  allosaur 1 month, 1 week ago
    What me dino recollects and took away from the Benghazi betrayal~
    Preening to be reelected, our past Obamanation for a Liar-In-Chief, quite smugly stated on my TV: "Al Qaeda is on the run."
    The embassy at Benghazi shortly thereafter being besieged did not fit at all well into that narrative. It became an inconvenient truth to be ignored. Ignore it. Maybe it wiould just go away.
    The bloodbath that followed would have embarrassed normal people.
    Me dino also saw Minority Speaker Pelosi being interviewed by reporters on my TV shortly thereafter the previous thereafter.
    "Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi," Nutty Nancy complained. "Can't we talk about something else?"
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  blarman 1 month, 1 week ago
    Holy cow! Thanks for this. I heard about the report, but this is literally a revelation and explains much about why Boehner suddenly called it quits - he was probably taking major heat from his own party after this and rightly so.

    I knew the Democrats involved have blood on their hands and slime all over the rest of them, but this is just more evidence of how bad the swamp really is.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo