Thank you. You made me feel better.

Hey. Don't get me wrong. I object to invaders at our Borders. I've lost relatives and waved goodbye to my husband so often I asked him to make my tombstone an Angel waving goodbye. He said he could do half of that but an Angel stretched him.

As I commented in a previous post that my wife and I hope the military bring the Sound Cannons to the border of Az to repel the invasion.

what I was looking for is some way so if a person somehow got into the country without getting legal permission, they could be captured and deported regardless of claiming asylum or some other excuse. Once they get loose inside our country its hard to find them.

I bet Canada doesnt have this issue at all. From the border security netflix shows, if you sneak into canada, you get pursued and sent out without fanfare.

A DMZ is neutral territory between two countries. A wall is not a DMZ and is a barrier from one set of laws, i.e., forces permitted to the government. The real border is the law which allows government certain actions if a person crosses into that jurisdiction. A wall whether of a prison or between counties is a way of forcing a person from leaving or from coming back without government permission. It leashes people to the government.

The Posse Comitatus law expressly forbids the US military from law enforcement duty, in effect since the Federal government ended martial law in the former Confederate states. What the military will do is provide more eyes in the sky, in the form of helicopters and drones that will be able to detect migrants trying to slip across the border. They will transport Border Patrol agents via helicopter where they're needed. They will help construct additional housing for captured illegals. They will provide medical care for agents and illegals. They will construct barriers at key points where there is no wall. They will provide emergency communications. They will not be bringing weapons to the border to be used in any other way but self defense.

The point is to provide needed support to the Border patrol, enabling them to be more effective against large groups of migrants seeking to overwhelm them. Ruby Ridge was carried out by the FBI. Waco was carried out by the BATF. The US military had no part in any of that.

we do have invaders, and we need to do something quickly given that there are not 3 caravans on their way here, and that number will only increase until we change our laws. Anyone who jumps the fence should never be allowed to enter the USA legally, whether by claiming asylum or even the legal way. Something needs to be done, even if its tossed by the liberal courts

Seems like it would have to be militarized to remove hoards of invaders. So could not be a DMZ. Also DMZs are from treaties between two warring countries, which does not apply to the USA and Mexico.

This isn't the employment of force against US citizens, but against invaders seeking to enter our country illegally and in open defiance of our sovereignty and laws. They have no respect for law and deserve nothing but a staunch "NO" - punctuated by force if necessary. I even support lethal force in this avenue, as there is no ignorance on the part of these miscreants. Maybe one strong statement will dramatically tell everyone else - in Mexico and beyond - that our borders are not to be trifled with. If you want to come here, do it legally.

I totally agree. I hope this not get out of hand and innocent people get killed.

Waco, Ruby Ridge, Okla. City, all CIA driven. This is driven by Soros, the UN and Obama. I think these military guys know how to keep their cool, but hope they do not let them pass. I think Calif. should be forced to have all of them and keep them in their state, forever. That would soon end this absurdity, as they would soon all be in deep poverty and wishing to go home. They are not presently underfed nor poorly dressed, this was an arranged invasion. Those wishing to erase all borders and get rid of the Constitution set it up months ago.. The CIA was into hiding what they did not want the public to kowo, with killing the first option.

I wonder if anyone has thought of a DMZ at the southern border and whether that would require congressional approval (60 votes in senate) ?

Another way would be apprehension and immediate deportation if someone crossed the border anywhere other than at an official port of entry.

Thanks for those details, jeffdh. I didn't want to exclude any of the border states, and had I known this I would have pointed out Texas had set such an example. Don't you wish that it had occurred sooner?

Count on little kids being held up with dares to open fire. So shoot over their heads. Most of that mob won't be able to see what's going on and will be more likely to panic.
Oh, new thought. Me dino hasn't seen any of those wannabe illegals carrying anything to ward off tear gas.

Very goiod idea!

Maybe we need a DMZ at the southern border of the USA to make it harder for illegal immigration to happen. Anyone caught in the DMZ is to be sent back to mexico, period.

They sense movement at the border and turn themselves on...border crosser's can't even get close. The sound covers 100' high, 100' below ground and 100yards wide. Sensing distance and effected area in front of the unit could go up to 50' (adjustable) at 100 yards wide.

Cost at the time was much less than a billion for the units, power and instillation.

I keep getting calls from political wannabees looking for my vote next week. The ones from republican candidates get an earful from me and complete denial of any support other than a straight line R vote. They get told in no uncertain terms to support our President and build the wall. Seems sad that I have to vote for republicans even though far too many of them are RINO's. Dump every democrat while we are at it because they are just power hungry anti American hooligans.

What good does automatic sensing units do if the moment someone steps over they can apply for asylum and start months worth of legal battles to stay. You have to keep people from physically stepping into the U.S.

A sensor won't do that.

My guess is that the military will send the message to the invaders - don't do it. A few rounds lobed over their heads (probably blanks) a few hits with the thunder cannon and hand out the new undies. I am tired for paying for other peoples food, clothing, and housing. I applaud Trump going after anchor babies. This abuse of our country has to stop.

Do not throw Texas in that mix . We started sending troops in May . That and the Texas Rangers "Special Units" along with ICE . That is why California and Arizona seem to be the big crossing points .

Arizona, New Mexico, Texas and CA should have already called out the militia to defend their borders. Federal intervention should not have been needed if there were men with courage controlling the states defenses. But the states are infested with socialists and hold the wimp governors hostage with threats against their chances to be re-elected. The governors are either socialists or complicit socialist tools.
Federal intervention can go wrong. It usually does because centralized power was never intended by the founders who signed the Declaration of Independence and risked everything to win freedom from the British crown.
The state governors must grow some stones and become true governors, not just wimps who comply to irrational demands from state Democrat Party hacks using brainwashed urban voters as their weapon.

I did some research, talked to the MFG, got a price estimate for the automatic sensing units necessary to cover our border and sent the info to the Gov, and McCain in AZ...never heard a word back from them...all that work for nothin...

Ha. No matter what they were running from, they'll be running right back to it. I heard those things hurt bad enough to make people run into anything.

They need a "Shockwave" canon...lots of pain, no injuries and probably won't stop running until they get back to where they started...