The alcohol part was criminal activity, as the drinking age back then was not 15. I am sure the parent of normal children would be investigated by Children's Services today.

I dont think we have heard all the dirt on her yet. First of all, she is a liberal, and a professor- both things mean she is pretty much of an intellectual idiot.
MSM lets us hear all the dirt they dig up on Kavanaugh, but not on the "professor" The democrats would do ANYTHING to keep Trump from doing his job. Too bad. I hope the Repubs just approve Kavanaugh regardless of what the dems say.

There are lots of events that can be manipulated to fit a new standard. The casting couch existed for 100 years or so, and still does, but now it is ok to out someone you may have grudgingly serviced to get what you wanted. Revenge is a dish best served cold.

This makes me wonder if there is ANYONE that doesn't have some little "sex secret" in their past, all the way back to childhood. Mostly these remain unrevealed only because few people's adult life draws much public attention and there is little fame or profit for someone to publicly announce them. It doesn't have to be a crime but an embarrassment, nevertheless.

Yes, which is why it had to go, but I am sure that Q has a copy, Q seems to have everything....

Wow. Nice job!

This certainly paints a whole new light on the accusations - and the accuser. According to this, the girls were not only completely aware of what went on at these parties, but they looked forward to it. Kind of blows away any kind of implied narrative of coercion. Also seriously degrades any kind of credibility on the part of Ford.

Yes, but it certainly makes it harder if every Friday or Saturday is accounted for...

posted to facebook...thank you...

That's nice but since Ford doesn't say when it happened you Kavanaugh can't prove he was somewhere else. All he can really do is say that HE has no record of a party like that.

Nice

Ah, the press uses anything needed, or makes it up, because that is the tools that work, how many of us see a story and go: Ah ha, see!. I have been caught too, and not been able to verify the story (which is the real tragedy, the whole purpose of journalism is to be professional and dispassionate and report facts). The media today is the equivalent of Geobble's Vőlkischer Beobachter.

Very good, Carl. +++++!

The whole thin is propaganda or the yearbook thing? The yearbook thing is really suspicious as it would have been some evidence that she was not the blushing virgin they are portraying her as.

Yes, but is it even true? It has morphed over the last week from what was revealed (and even THATR is not so sure, as Fienstein refuses to release the original letter, so no one knws what is really in it) and now there are rumblings of the supposed second boy shifting from "nothing happened" to "we took turns with her". This is getting all the points of a made up testing session where the dumbocraps and deep state keep trying tweaks to see what will stick. I say stop it all and vote, after that there is nothing they can do. The same thing happened to Clarence Thomas, and he was black, so they had to find a black accuser, and it all died the day he was confirmed. This is all kabuki theater.

This sounds like propaganda aimed at electing Democrats in the midterm elections. My reaction is I don't care for the sausage after seeing what goes into it.

LATE BREAKING Reports: Kavanaugh Has Found 1982 Calendar, Detailed Entries Help Clear His Name https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/kav...

"Finally, Kavanaugh has presented tangible evidence that the accusation doesn’t hold up."

"On Sunday, The New York Times reported that the judge has found old calendars from the period when the unproven groping allegedly took place — and they appear to support his claim that the incident didn’t happen."

YES. Certainly she didn't go alone to the party
Yet, she has no friend to corroborate that she was even there. That is implausible.

WOW...I wonder if this will come upon cross examination...or will she get a pass...doesn't sound like a party BK would attend but at 17...who knows.

But 4 witnesses have come forward, one a friend of hers and say...it didn't happen, they were never there and neither was BK.

Dershowitz was interviewed about this and I saw it.

He is an objective voice, and I applaud him. Despite him being a democrat, he stands up for the integrity of his profession.

According to him, a sexual assault is about penetration which did not occur in this case. What we hear is that the accuser allegedly "attempted to remove her clothes and groped".

That is not a sexual assault. How does she know that had the attacker managed to remove her clothes, he would not have recoiled and left her alone?

Just to carry this train of thoughts further.

The press always tells the whole truth.
See attached for an example. LOL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Urvbr...

Guilt by association is not a valid Objective standard to go by. Commentary in the yearbook, as allowed by the teachers, etc of the time, give a picture of cultural norms. However, that does not excuse actions of a particular individual, especially if they were truly criminal, such as rape.

The events described in the letter she sent in to Congress, are more like playful teenage roughhousing, than anything criminal. I think she is highly exaggerating the interaction, in my opinion. Especially the description that there was another guy there that jumped on both of them twice and knocked all three of them apart in the process. The whole thing sounds like it was about a minute of fall down on a bed while kissing, then the jealous other guy playfully interrupts, then she yells, then they get knocked off the bed, then the whole thing ends.
Furthermore, she voluntarily went up stairs with them. Sillyness, not malicious criminal activity.

The press feeds totally unfounded information to the public, as a rule. I have been following a few cases where I had first hand information so I knew how off the press was. They print anything they hear, never mind facts.

In a high level case such as this, the falsehood is even greater, considering the MSM's hostility toward the current administration.

Thank you for posting the yearbooks, at least what was saved of it. According to today's coverage, all four of Ford's "witnesses" said they did not know Kavanaugh and never attended the party.

Wonder what Ford will come up with at the trial where she does not want Kavanaugh be present. I never heard that an accuser wants the accused not to hear what the charges are. The whole idea of the trial is to get to the bottom of what is being claimed.

I hope the GOP will use the yearbook to shed a light on who this woman is.

Hot dang! A scrubbed high school yearbook?
And up until right now this age 71 me dino thought he had finally heard of everything.

It probably won't matter. Perception is reality.

Right now, Kavanaugh is painted as a "sexual assaulter". She said he is, that is all that matters. The women must be respected for her "feelings" and sense of violation or not. Her viewpoint matters, NOT the terrible man's.
I hope that common sense prevails, aided by such yearbook postings that describe the culture of the time, but I am afraid that it won't.