I love Nebraska's new motto: "Nebraska, we're not for everyone."

Here is his latest, but you need to steel yourself, as he tends to go off on a rant. He hates Al, because of the whole misrepresentation of what is happening, you can skip the first minute as he is playing an Indian flute to calm himself. He lives on a off the grid farm in 4 corners area, and somehow has internet, which I think is satellite based. But listen to the whole thing and he will illustrate the flaws in the logic, the data to support what is going on and probably give you your first clear shot at what is really happening.

https://youtu.be/tNiUfFySvno

Your reference to Diamond. Do you have a YouTube link?

Nebraska is good for that sort of thing, on the farm, you often have to find numerous uses for bubblegum and bailing string (no wire any more)...

Exactly. It is also the ones you cannot see (cosmic ray flux) that are really messing with the environment. Diamond has all the links on their You Tube videos to everyplace he pulls news from. One of them is connected to people who pull all the scientific data real time so you can see the changes in solar flux. Too much flux is a bad thing...

Interesting that nowhere in the leftist narrative do they say this. All I hear is fake news trying to scare me into cutting co2 emissions.

Snowbirds from Minnesotans winter in Nebraska!

My old AMC broke down while traveling though Nebraska on the way home from Wyoming and I rolled off the interstate into the Oak Gas Station who didn't have the stuff to fix the hellacious noise coming from under the hood. They directed me to Jody's garage.Good old Jody jerry rigged a part to work until we got to a dealer

From term2 above:
If more CO2, then more plant life.

This is logical, yes, and verified by global maps from satellite photos showing planet area with plant life is increasing while arid areas are decreasing.
More CO2 is good, there is no downside (possibly a very small cooling not warming), CO2 is now about 400ppm, only above 2000ppm are the affects uncertain.

Call me uneducated, but I look at the size of the earth (mass), the fact that it’s core is made up of very hot stuff that spews out hot lava, and the fact that the sun gives off massive heating of my swimming pool that eclipses anything I can artificially provide- so I conclude natural factors just seem so much bigger than man made ones when it comes to climate change.

It is true, and is one reason for the lies, as it is proven that prehistoric levels were double today, and a lot of it was locked up in plants, and they thrived, various cycles say there is a CO2 rise in warm times, being released as the world warms, Then it gets encased in the die off from the cold cycle. The solar cycle controls a lot of it. The main issue is scientists saw a change, and politicians hijacked it, but they do not understand the whole ecosystem or it's mechanisms.

Of course. Also I think the relevance to a persons life is important to how much attention one pays to it. I live hundreds of miles from the ocean , and away from most natural disasters. I won’t be around for any effects more than 10 years out., so I really don’t care about things like sea levels rising. By 2050.

I saw an interview on levinTv the other day.with someone from Cato Institute who said that as co2 levels rise, so does the.percentage of plant life and the ease of growing crops which use the co2. I never heard that in MSM. , Of course, but it sounds quite logical.

Exactly, and the history for the Grand Solar Minimum is not something hard to find, and is readily available. The fact that the mainstream is still fixated on Global Warming, climate change etc, irregardless. There are still complaints about sea level rise and yet no one notices the changes to weather patterns consistent with GSM in the past.

Politics always trumps science (no pun intended.) Each siide of an issue can come up with "facts" to support it's position. So I guess we each have to figure out for ourselves which outcome would be the worst for us and prepare for it as best we can. History will prove what actually happened (if we can agree with who's version of history is valid.)

Term, better to know a factual climate outlook, than a political one manipulated to squeeze money and control you.This one has like, 5000 years of history behind it...so I trust it a lot more than Al "give me your money Gore".

Global cooling is upon us. New taxes, new scientific propaganda to justify new powers

If you go look up Oppenheimer Ranch on You Tube, a guy called Diamond not only screams "Al, you Liar" every once in a while, but tries to summarize what is going on, in regards to the Grand Solar Minimum. It is a fact, every 150 years or so, the sun will go dormant for about 10-20 years, and in a Grand event, it goes for 40 or 50. The "Little Ice Age" was one such, and the Carrington Event happened in the last one, as another thing that happens is there are large coronal holes that open up, and emit large CME's (Coronal Mass Ejections) which, if they hit us, can take down the grid, completely. Not only is there a lot of cooling, but there are a lot of other effects. One is that the mangetic field collapses around the erath, shrinking the Van Allen belts, reducing the protection, allowing more cosmic rays to penetrate, causing cloud nucleation and a heck of a lot more rain, stronger storms and the internal heating of the core goes up, expanding the volume, resulting in more eruptions and earthquakes. Guess what: all happening. Nothing to panic about, but the global food and power systems are not prepared. So, you owe yourself some research and preparation, as it will go on for quite a while.

the Mark Levin show on sunday nite at 10 pm on FOX news featured a professor from Cato Institute that debunked the Warming myth...

Snark aside, the way it's been explained to me is that the problem isn't warming or cooling in and of themselves. A change of temperature in either direction, if it happens too quickly, causes extreme weather events (which can include localized extreme cold even if the average temperature over the whole planet is rising).

Of course, this doesn't justify throwing tax money at the pet schemes of Al Gore or anyone else. We don't know nearly enough about what it would take to fix the problem, or if that's even possible. It could be that the damage has been done and the best we can do is ride it out.

Ayn predicted this global warming crap when she wrote about the State Science Institute in Atlas Shrugged.

Now remember, the new term is "climate disruption," so even if the climate really doesn't change, they can point to every severe weather event as a result of humans disrupting an otherwise idyllic, peaceful climate.

Cover all bets.

It’s cold, equals climate change. It’s warm, equals climate change. Another trillion dollars is needed to stop, climate change.

I keep an eye on my power bill. This year, all months, except for one have been colder than the previous year. I suspect that Climate Change will soon be changed to Global Cooling, and I fear another ice age is creeping up. I try to put as much CO2 in the air as possible, but I think I’m losing!

Yes, when they realized the chicanery of Al Gore was failing, they decided that "Climate Change" would cover all bets, and then they could move to just tax and restrict everything, just to address something. That simplified things to the level seen in AS...