1


Posted by ewv 14 hours, 19 minutes ago


Kavanaugh was named in the polygraph session. https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/post...

Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Flag | Ignore | Permalink

From your link ""The questions reported did not include Kavanaugh's name"

both are contradicting statements. Which is it ?

I don't doubt the appearance of her behavior (and that of many others at the hearing), but that does not answer the questions concerning legitimate medical diagnosis and conclusions that can be drawn about the veracity of her testimony. If you only intended to describe behavior, then that characterizes it in contrast to the bizarre CIA conspiracy "explanation", but that is to be dismissed anyway and watching her on TV is a long way from making medical conclusions and ruling out other possibilities.

The article has no mention of religion.


“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”
 — David Rockefeller, Baden-Baden, Germany 1991

I do not need to reread my own post. What is your point? Kavanaugh's name was in the hand-written statement as "Brett" and in the interview as it was described. A big problem with the polygraph report to the Committeeis is that it filtered the actual questions asked, and filtered the verbal interview for which no transcript was provided, but for which the report's account contained Kavanaugh's name frequently. Whatever actually happened and was said in that session, no objective account as evidence would rely on Ford's lawyers to decide what is "relevant", what to omit, and what to paraphrase. My post described all this and more.

Is this a joke? "Truth Talk Network" is a religious web site, not evidence for a conspiracy theory claiming the "CIA controls the media narrative". The article is another example of the conspiracy theory mentality stringing together out of context and unverified 'facts' claiming to justify a concocted sweeping conspiratorial 'explanation' of national and world events. The whole approach is thoroughly anti intellectual and irrational. Promoting it does not belong on an Ayn Rand forum.

You need to reread your comment from the link you provided

"The questions reported did not include Kavanaugh's name. The only two "relevant questions" reported from the polygraph test by the examiner, who was selected by her lawyers, were:

"Is any part of you statement false?"
and
"Did you make up any part of your statement?".

But she was asked several questions as part of the polygraph test. The questions from which those two were selected were characterized as "includes relevant questions addressing the issues to be resolved by the examination, comparison questions to be used in analysis, symptomatic questions, and neutral or irrelevant questions. All questions were reviewed with Blasey prior to the test." (Different types of questions are included for calibration of the physical polygraph responses.)
"

How the CIA controls the Media Narrative!
https://medium.com/@wesleyadouglas/ho...

OK. I would suggest you start with the discussion in wikipedia.org: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histrio.... This will help explain much of her behavior, and give you insight about people with this condition; especially look at the DSM-IV-TR criteria. She meets at least 5 of the criteria. Thank you for your interest.

I'm back! ... .
I have just seen this:
quadrant.org.au/opinion/doomed-planet...

Climate Change, an eruption of mass delusion
the legions of righteousness have gathered . . . politicians and self-appointed activists to whom CC provides a prominent platform for no-risk, low-cost virtue signalling. Following these are the ranks of empire building bureaucrats and a vast array of camp followers drawn by the scent of power and profits. It’s a heady mix and hard to resist.

The climate/carbon change scare movement (and the accusation against the judge) are not products of conspiracy. They are a result of moral posturing whereby the soft-headed show what good, kind, virtuous people they are by (they claim) saving the planet (and supporting victims).
That the planet is not going to roast, more likely cooling, and victims are not victims, does not matter to them. Hoards of the badly dressed and the guilt-ridden wealthy loudly join in self-flagellation and scream for climate action and justice. Ok some are paid by Soros and that ilk. Do not look to Soros for the source of evil, it is in ourselves when we let emotions overcome thinking.

Indeed, and yet dismissed as "irrelevant"

https://www.americanhistoryusa.com/ye...

Yet salacious they are:

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/...

Apparently college was a balst, but then nothing seems amiss:

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/exclusi...

I have yet to ascertain if they were "scrubbed" I have not found a link that references them, but the college ones, as indicated in the article are available.

Funny, this article seems to think the roots of our current Yellow Journalism go back to 1880 and capitalists fighting for money and sales. Yet today, that is reversed, media apparently doesn't care about profits, unless...

https://www.americanhistoryusa.com/ye...

Ah, votes, smotes, anyone can feel free to down vote me all day long, won't be the first time, won't be the last. I usually up vote just to acknowledge the effort of someone to reply, because it is what I think is right. No one going to persuade me otherwise......

The intellectual establishment has been dominantly statist-collectivist for almost a century. They have never required that same percentage of Americans in general. They propagandize in the name of news and education, based on their own ideology, to everyone.

Indeed, one has to wonder at the HUGE number of "anonymous" people, who never seem to come up with facts, yet are treated as hardcore truth...of course it all just accident and something..it can't be a conspiracy. Although the right managed to have a "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" against Clinton, didin't they?

Uh, it is easier to pontificate, than it is to debate and discuss, especially when the debate is not one you approve of? Just a guess...but then, as a conspiracy theorist, I just accept anything that is in my favor for my argument and discard anything counter to it, it's so much easier...oh wait, that's the Democrats method...

Yes, and they refuse to turn over those records. They are feeding the committee only what they want it to see. Even the polygraph was carefully conducted in private and filtered before providing it to the committee. I have also found that a lot of documentation on the web was scrubbed before she went public. It seems that her own school yearbook and reputation are just as raunchy as Kavanaugh's. They have suppressed that while focusing on Kavanaugh's as they try to manufacture different images.

So, is that logical? Rational? What percentage of Americans are considered Liberal? What percentage are Conservative? It means media is choosing to fight for approx 50% of the population, and leave the rest to, whoever. That says either media have 0 business sense, or media is so committed to the left wing cause, they will willingly sacrifice profit and income to ensure the left wing program is supported. There is a severe limit on conservative sites, none that really qualify as MSM, except maybe Fox, who are trying to walk a fine line. Of course, we can just write off the logic and pretend it's all just the fact the liberals love to do non working jobs, but I would say that is some evidence to support some other reason.

But not the therapists notes, which is Q's point.

Kavanaugh was named in the polygraph session. https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/post...

The media always support left wing causes, based on the ideas they share. That is not explained by a supposed CIA plot controlling a university and a professor, conveniently claimed to be immune from the requirement of proof because it's "deep". That is a laughing stock, and the left is exploiting it to the hilt to ridicule the entire movement to stop them from controlling the court.

The anti-conceptual conspiracy theory mentality is rejected for good reason. That rejection is not a CIA plot.

This is the article she co-authored. It is not about creating false memories and has nothing to do with the CIA.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/p...
"Meditation with yoga, group therapy with hypnosis, and psychoeducation for long-term depressed mood: a randomized pilot trial", Journal of Clinical Psychology 2008 Jul;64(7):806-20

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-571, USA.

Abstract:

"This randomized pilot study investigated the effects of meditation with yoga (and psychoeducation) versus group therapy with hypnosis (and psychoeducation) versus psychoeducation alone on diagnostic status and symptom levels among 46 individuals with long-term depressive disorders. Results indicate that significantly more meditation group participants experienced a remission than did controls at 9-month follow-up. Eight hypnosis group participants also experienced a remission, but the difference from controls was not statistically significant. Three control participants, but no meditation or hypnosis participants, developed a new depressive episode during the study, though this difference did not reach statistical significance in any case. Although all groups reported some reduction in symptom levels, they did not differ significantly in that outcome. Overall, these results suggest that these two interventions show promise for treating low- to moderate-level depression."

The Federalist tried to turn it into a 'smoking gun' here: https://thefederalist.com/2018/10/01/... Apparently the conspiracy crowd took it from there. Please do not embarrass this forum with more of that.

Nickursis , with a bit of due diligence it is apparent
That Q is providing timely info to shed a light on the agenda of the global statist cabal. Why do you think the people who call it a kooky theory or a cult have such an emotional opposition when it is clear they have no idea what they are arguing against and obviously have not read any of his thousands of drops?

Funny how she wanted to remain anonymous.
She couldn't be more exposed if it was during the half time during the Super Bowl. Talk about flood lights .She was burnt from the glare.