Sadly, after all the well-meaning attempts to defend Kavanaugh from the perception of unfair attacks, direct evidence of Kavanaugh's behavior while in school has just been uncovered in this 2001 audio:

'"I uh, didn't take school that seriously. I, uh, got into fights. I, uh, drank 'n did uh, 'n 'n consumed, uh, substances that uh [laugh], weren't always legal. Um, and, uh, you know I think generally was, um, acting um, uh in ways that uh thitwhen I look back on it I understand, uh. I think that what got through me those years, was, um, sur a natural aptitude for schooling, which meant that I didn't haveta pay attention too much ta be able to keep my grades up 'n at least uh, umm, graduate. Uh some of my behavior was self-destructive, you know, uh atuh I might uh, drink a six-pack, uh, in an hour before uh, uh before goin back ta class. Uh things like that."

You can hear the audio and where it came from on Mark Levin's radio show where he acknowledged that he fears this will sink Kavanaugh's nomination. Start at 01:17:50 https://omny.fm/shows/mark-levin-audi...

Oddly, the Democrats on the committee don't care, believing that this is evidence of presidential material.

‘Conspiracy theory’ is a term that strikes fear and anxiety in the hearts of most every public figure, particularly journalists and academics. Since the 1960s the label has become a disciplinary device that has been overwhelmingly effective in defining certain events as off limits to inquiry or debate. Especially in the United States, raising legitimate questions about dubious official narratives destined to inform public opinion (and thereby public policy) is a major thought crime that must be cauterized from the public psyche at all costs… CIA Document 1035-960 played a definitive role in making the ‘conspiracy theory’ term a weapon to be wielded against almost any individual or group calling the government’s increasingly clandestine programs and activities into question. – From CIA Document 1035-960

Zero, I invite you to go examine the conspiracy regarding Global Warming, and then come back in a few years and explain why there is mass starvation and unrest because of the Grand Solar Minimum which is also described by the MSM as a "conspiracy theory". Objectively, you can assemble a line of factual data that goes back 80 years that can be shown to say that this whole push has been a concerted effort to steer us to a single world government. If you want just straight up facts, you run into all kinds of issues, when those facts are hidden and withheld, or have you not heard of Peter Strozk? Or do you believe there was no effort to cover up Hilary's treason, and manipulate the public to "get Trump"?

I was hoping for a serious explanation of the significance of what you say you observed as a doctor, in contrast to the rampant conspiracy theories and subjectivism dominating the rest of this thread and which are anything but "insightful".

I do not need to reread my own post. What is your point? Kavanaugh's name was in the hand-written statement as "Brett" and in the interview as it was described. A big problem with the polygraph report to the Committeeis is that it filtered the actual questions asked, and filtered the verbal interview for which no transcript was provided, but for which the report's account contained Kavanaugh's name frequently. Whatever actually happened and was said in that session, no objective account as evidence would rely on Ford's lawyers to decide what is "relevant", what to omit, and what to paraphrase. My post described all this and more.

Yes, and they refuse to turn over those records. They are feeding the committee only what they want it to see. Even the polygraph was carefully conducted in private and filtered before providing it to the committee. I have also found that a lot of documentation on the web was scrubbed before she went public. It seems that her own school yearbook and reputation are just as raunchy as Kavanaugh's. They have suppressed that while focusing on Kavanaugh's as they try to manufacture different images.

Ah, Dob, did you see the thing that was one of the Q focus points: Lindsey asking specifically about the state of war, the use of court-martials on civilians and the fact they executed 2 spies in WW2 using those laws? If they didin't get the message of the storm coming for them, they are worse than stupid, as they have a lot of criminal acts to answer for. Even if they lose in November, they can drop the sealed indictment on the members of Congress who are criminals, and make the evidence public, and then we can have a do over next year when the dust settles. The Republicans that are supposedly "panicking" at losing the House and Senate in November, must not be in the know, or have their own crimes to worry about. Imagine what happened AFTER AS ended, the total tear down of the government to have to rebuild because they were all criminals. Ayn Rand may have actually foretasted the future for real.

So, then, what would you propose to confront such a threat? Obviously, installing a constitutional judge vice a political appointee is terrifying to the democrats, so how would you say we stop it?

Democrats have made it more than clear for months that they were trying to stop the Kavanaugh appointment and would have done the same for anyone else on Trump's list of possible nominees. They turned the Senate hearing into a circus before the Ford theatrical production. They are still protesting the appointment. Of course stopping it was their goal. It was also Ford's goal. She said she told her story now because she doesn't want someone like him on the court. She not only waited over 30 years to make her accusation; she never pursued it legally, even now, only in politics to try to derail the nomination.

Kavanaugh may be much weaker on limited government than is widely believed -- he could turn out to be another Kennedy 'swing vote' on crucial issues. But he is "conservative" enough in adherence to the Constitution in comparison with the leftists on the Court that the Democrats wanted him stopped "by any means necessary" because of it.

No one in this controversy has laughed off violent crime. Ford has been mocked for her testimony, not for the kind of assault she thinks someone did to her. She was taken seriously as sincere and believable until the campaign of farcical accusations went on for too long, by any foot-dragging method possible, despite being refuted in her accusations against Kavanaugh. By the time the circus continued for weeks she deserved to be mocked, but no one laughed at "violent crime". That is the rewrite by Democrats attempting to smear their opponents as the Democrats pursued their turning of due process and burden of proof upside down in accordance with the ideology of their misogynist 'social justice' campaign claiming a "woman's accusations must be believed". They were properly morally repudiated.

The three ring circus is not inexplicable. The hysterical irrationalism is a result of the way the perpetrators think combined with deliberate New Left gorilla theater political activism in accordance with Saul Alinsky nihilism. They were not passive observers like those seeing a train wreck; they planned and caused it. It's the way they think. This was followed by a band-wagon effect among Republicans suddenly proclaiming all kinds of agreements, including the willingness to make a hero out of the likes of Susan Collins, whom many of them despise. The spreading, hysterical irrationalism in mob thinking, which is deeper than politics, is the more fundamental threat.