John McCain to discontinue medical treatment for brain cancer
I didn't always agree with him and his positions but I will miss him when he departs the political scene. He was first and foremost an honorable man a man of courage. There are few like him in there strength and resolve to do what they perceive as right and correct.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
His "legacy" of "serving his country" is couched as being a "war hero". He was not. A war hero is someone who does something definitive and great to win the war, or at least some part of it if the war is ultimately lost -- something that stands out as significant accomplishment beyond what others do in battle. McCain did nothing of the kind. He was quickly shot down and captured -- that was unfortunate for him and not something to disparage him for, but it doesn't make him a war hero. He undermined his own personal heroism in contending with his torturers by refusing to leave when he had the chance, deliberately choosing to be further tortured by the enemy, which added to his own permanent, disabling personal injuries.
He basked in that pointless, chosen horrible sacrifice ever since as if it were a national and personal virtue. Tolerating and surviving torture would be personal heroism; choosing it is not. It did no one any good. He should have gotten out when he was offered the chance and then used everything he knew about it to help go back and rescue the others. Instead, we are expected to -- and most of the country does -- laud him for the claimed virtue of choosing to suffer and accomplishing nothing through sacrifice for the sake of sacrifice. No one likes the fact that he was tortured by communists and he did not deserve that; but choosing to continue it was senseless, not virtue, and does not make him a war hero.
One would expect that a "political giant" and "great Senator" as the media is bending over backwards to sing his glory, would honor that position when it came up for vote.
It was defeated on his vote in the Senate.
McCain has served this country dishonorably.
That is his legacy.
Perhaps that is what mminnick is saying.
I remember the time (yes back then!) when Josef Stalin died. I lived in a country that thought of itself as cultured with good manners at least in public. The press deplored a few of the celebrations coming from the US. I shared that view, then, before I knew much about Stalin.
Yes, let there be more civility in public discourse but refraining from making justified criticism is self-censorship and hypocrisy supporting the bad, worse than bad manners.
Yet that is what he is widely admired for; serving not only to promote evil but used as a cover to excuse all manner of destructive policy and action.
"A man of courage" with "strength and resolve to do what they perceive as right and correct" for fundamentally wrong and evil goals with fundamentally destructive thinking is not admirable with only "disagreement with some positions".
We don't have to -- and should not -- embrace inappropriate mocking his cancer and be 'glad to see him go' in death to recognize that. Such personal lashing out detracts from and obscures rational evaluation.
My major sticking point for staying in the union was that if I ever got wrote up and suspended without pay for usually a month, the union would pay me the same amount to sit at home.
Long story short, I was never suspended without pay. That "insurance policy" caused me to breathe easier, though.
Ain't saying I was never chewed out. There were so many picky, picky ways to get into trouble it would make your head spin. And through the years, a few of my co-workers proved to be "back-stabbers" as a figure of speech..
During a shift briefing, I recall nodding when a lieutenant said "This is a cutthroat business."
And what do messed-with laid-off steel workers do? They bring in the AFL-CIO. That warden got drunk one night, called a union activist officer over to his house, punched the said officer in the guts, got sued and settled by paying one of those undisclosed sums the punched officer said he could not discuss under court order..
Raised by an anti-union father, I reluctantly joined for my own protection. Things did get way better.
Later I felt repulsed when the union sent me their AFL-CIO magazine with a smiling Slick Willie on the cover. Me dino threw it away on sight and did the same to any other union magazine sent in the mail.
I stayed in that union, though, until the end of my my 21-year-career.
Hey, John, now we know what's been wrong with your mind for all these years.
Now I just gotta show off with some really real un-PC.
Hang on! Here we go with my first un-PC imagining~
Hey, John! Wanna hear a lot of groans?
Go knock-knock on heaven's door, John!
Me dino be tempted to to think up more.
No, just stop it, dino. Just stop it.
Go do something else.
One more sentence to add to what I said above: if we forgive people the evil things they have done because there have been good things they have done as well, to me that logic would apply to all criminals. Surely, everyone has done something good in their lives.
It is difficult for me to look at this as a balancing act between good and bad. If all the bad wipes out every trace of the good, especially at a time when one's role is of extreme consequence to the country, it can't be justified.
Just as you I don't ask you to take my position, though.
Now if he'd just resign to fade away quietly with his family instead of being a wrecking ball, turncoat, obstructionist for the establishment and special interests...
On April 6, 2012 when I met with the U.S. State Department’s Deputy Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Mr. Frank Ruggiero, I asked him who are the real decisions makers regarding the continuation of the war in Afghanistan? He implied that it was not President Obama when I asked if it was the President. It looks like it is the Pentagon, war mongers and war profiteers especially the ones in our government arguing for the continuation of this war, which is highly profitable to them.
I strongly believe it is time that the Senate Ethics Committee investigate whether or not Senator John McCain, Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and other senators, such as Senator Tom Cotton, Senator Lindsey Graham, Representative Dana Rohrabacher and Representative Adam Kinzinger have conflicts of interest and allegedly are personally profiting from the perpetuation of the war in Afghanistan.
It has been alleged in the Afghan media and by some Afghan individuals that some U.S. Senators, who sit on the Senate Armed Services Committee, are profiting from the war and the drug trafficking in Afghanistan such as through the provision of necessary chemicals to convert the raw opium to heroin. Senator John McCain’s wife, Mrs. Cindy Hensley McCain’s businesses allegedly profit from the war in Afghanistan. It appears that Senator McCain tries to keep an arm’s length distance from his wife’s war profits to try to shield himself from conflict of interest problems.However, since Senator McCain is presently serving as the “Chairman” of the Senate Armed Services Committee, the ethics committee should investigate these allegations. In addition, it has been reported by Afghan media, Afghan individuals and other western media that intelligence services such as the CIA and MI6 are involved in the drug trafficking in Afghanistan. The Senate Ethics Committee needs to investigate these allegations involving senators and any alleged connections that may be conflicts of interest
In addition, I Congressional Committee need to investigate the funding of the so-called “ISIL” fighters in Afghanistan. I believe individuals such as U.S. Senator John McCain are obstacles to peace in Afghanistan because of the war profiteering in his family. At a recent U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee’s hearing on February 9, 2017, when General Nicholson was asked why the United States or the Afghan government do not use air power to eliminate the opium fields, General Nicholson quickly stated that the counter narcotics policy is not a defense policy. Chairman McCain did not make any comment. It appeared that it was an issue no one wanted to address especially the war profiteers on the committee. Very quickly the committee moved on to the next issue.
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2017/06...
Load more comments...