Strozk and Page are not the only criminals at the DOJ meet Allison Hrabar

Posted by Dobrien 5 years, 7 months ago to History
16 comments | Share | Flag

Will she faces charges for her crimes?

19 hours ago · Allison Hrabar, a Justice Department paralegal, said in the undercover video that she found the address of a ... DOJ investigating Her.

To be fair here is her lie oops I mean response.
Hrabar denied that she ever used work resources to further her political activism. The D.C.-area DSA group said in a statement that "James O'Keefe and the wildly unethical Project Veritas have been discredited and dismissed by investigative journalists, congressional committees, and several courts. This campaign, which wrongly targets both these dedicated public servants' privacy and their freedom to exercise their 1st amendment right, is just the latest in a long line of failed political attacks from a group desperate to remain relevant."
As if the communist DSA is credible.
SOURCE URL: https://youtu.be/S9qugiX6uYY


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by CircuitGuy 5 years, 6 months ago
    I watched parts of it. Hrabar reminds me in appearance to my wife 15 years ago. Unlike the hidden camera, though, I made a point to focus on her face when she talked about food stamps or whatever, like at 10:34.

    My wife worked for DOJ in DC 20 years ago, before law school. She never saw any shenanigans. She can confirm it's hard to get fired, and some people do as little work as possible. So after law school, she went to work for a gov't agency aimed at fighting gov't waste. She became disillusioned and wants nothing to do with gov't again.

    I think the video is just kids having fun. If this were twenty years ago, I'd totally listen to Allison carry on about having the inside info on the Starr Report.

    I could be wrong; she could be a pawn in a nefarious plot. I suspect she's a kid goofing off to jackass pretending to be kid goofing off. These kids can't goof off anymore.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 5 years, 6 months ago
      One of the activists who chased Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen out of a Mexican restaurant Tuesday night over the Trump administration’s immigration policies is an employee of the Department of Justice, The Daily Caller News Foundation has confirmed.


      Members of the Washington, D.C., chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America crashed Nielsen’s meal with a demonstration full of chants and other outbursts.

      One of those participants, Allison Hrabar, actually works for the Trump administration — as a paralegal in the DOJ. […] The Washington Examiner spoke with Hrabar Wednesday and she defended her behavior as off government time and a use of her First Amendment rights.
      https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...
      Was she just having fun here too?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ nickursis 5 years, 6 months ago
        The issue really is they have an ethical requirement to seperate their politics from their work for the government. THAT is where the failure occurs. These videos illustrate that is not happening. It is the same in any business, you do not inject your politics into the business, and her "demonstration" is a clear indicator that her ethics are questionable.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by CircuitGuy 5 years, 6 months ago
        "Was [one of the people who harassed Secretary Nielsen] just having fun here too?"
        I can't tell whether in 20 years she'll graduate to more radical behavior or if she'll marry some geek and be embarrassed she was a part of the harassment.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 5 years, 6 months ago
          Ahhh she is an adult who works for the DOJ and she is just having fun playing communism. Her groups goal is to destroy capitalism.
          I suppose that is just fun and games for a liberal like you who supported the HRC and Obama.
          When are you going to grow up and hold people accountable for the actions the perform.

          “Democratic Socialists will not be covered [by the media] as the radicals that they are,” Glenn Beck said on his show. “They’ll be covered as ‘innovative, millennial-friendly upstarts with fresh ideas’ when they’re really diet-Communism

          The phrase is indeed everywhere. In addition to Ocasio-Cortez, Sen. Bernie Sanders and now New York gubernatorial candidate Cynthia Nixon have claimed the label. Meanwhile, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), the country’s largest socialist group, is seeing its membership explode from 6,000 in summer 2016 to more than 45,000 today. And the media doesn’t quite know what to make of it all.

          I’m a staff writer at the socialist magazine Jacobin and a member of DSA,

          and here’s the truth: In the long run, democratic socialists want to end capitalism.

          And we want to do that by pursuing a reform agenda today in an effort to revive a politics focused on class hierarchy and inequality in the United States. The eventual goal is to transform the world to promote everyone’s needs rather than to produce massive profits for a small handful of citizens.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by CircuitGuy 5 years, 6 months ago
            "she is an adult who works for the DOJ"
            I know, but now that I'm over 40 and she reminds me people I knew 20 years ago, I'm jokingly calling them kids.
            "Her group's goal is to destroy capitalism. I suppose that is just fun and games for [you]."
            My honest, non-joking, opinion is this person is no threat to capitalism unless Democratic Socialists and President Trump's supporters realize how similar they are. I actually don't think they will though. They'll carry on in their separate conspiracy-theory explanations for how their problems are someone else's fault. As time goes on the theories will change, but they'll never join forces, as least I hope not.

            I'm going to feel horrible about it if I'm wrong and it turns out a beautiful young paralegal was actually at the vanguard of communist revolution.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by 5 years, 6 months ago
              I wonder how you would feel if you were shouted out of a restaurant while you and your wife were trying to eat.https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/local/wp/...
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by CircuitGuy 5 years, 6 months ago
                My thoughts if I were in that situation:
                1. I'm worried that this nonsense is taking over and undermining constitutional democracy.
                2. It's a personally annoying aspect of a high-profile job.
                3. It would be weird to meet someone who looks like her when she worked at DOJ.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by 5 years, 6 months ago
                  Why is it so hard for you to understand this reality? What is the difference with denying an African American to eat at a restaurant or denying an apartment for rent. Every person who is not or has not commited a crime deserves to live his or her life with out interference, period.
                  To interfere with another individuals ability to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is against the fundamental principal , the very foundation of our constitution.
                  This is a crime, it violates his civil rights.
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by $ nickursis 5 years, 6 months ago
                    Indeed so, Dob, too many people like CG apparently want to only apply Civil Rights to specific species of humans, based on sex, color or religion, which seems to define the thing they find anathema: "profiling". However, the left seems to believe they can do whatever they want, and only those smelly peasant minions need to obey.
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                    • Posted by CircuitGuy 5 years, 6 months ago
                      I am wondering if you might have me confused with someone else, which can happen online more easily than face-to-face. I actually never use the words terrorism or hate crime because I don't think the motive for the crime matters. So I would treat all cases of harassment the same, regardless of motive.
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                      • Posted by 5 years, 6 months ago
                        Your previous comment says it all about your concern for individuals rights
                        "I think the video is just kids having fun. If this were twenty years ago, I'd totally listen to Allison carry on about having the inside info on the Starr Report.

                        I could be wrong; she could be a pawn in a nefarious plot. I suspect she's a kid goofing off to jackass pretending to be kid goofing off. These kids can't goof off anymore"
                        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                        • Posted by $ nickursis 5 years, 6 months ago
                          It is never that simple, and the videos are just data. It could all be fabricated, but then that could be true of any "revealing video, or exposition". The bottom line is: does the data fit the facts as you see it? Too many tyrannies have flourished because the unwashed masses refused to believe there are really, really bad people in the world.
                          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo