There you go...now that is using one's noggin.
They never did measure the charge even though there obviously was a resonant change.

I thing you have something there, Doc.

There is one provable fact, which is that the H2O molecule has several different angles of connection between the H and O atoms that are possible, which might be part of the observed effect. I don't know what might trigger an alignment change in some of the molecules, but it could change light refraction when observed at a microscopic level. We agree that when solid state memory changes a bit from a zero to a one charge that it has stored information, so if the state of a drop of water changes due to some interaction, wouldn't that be considered stored information?

Wow, me dino never thought of water drops internally containing different patterns kinda like snowflakes do externally.
No, not the snowflakes that scream and bawl "Not my president!" and want safe places with coloring books.
The original kind that floats down from a cold cloud.

We'll soon be thirsting for thirstiness.

Now that is funny...we couldn't use alcohol as a test bed for "Other" liquids because there is water in alcohol too.
As far as testing other liquids to see if they do the same things as water, I was thinking of Oil products as an example.
Can't think of another liquid that wouldn't have H2O mixed in, right at the moment.

That's an odd view of German Scientists...at least they are not caught up in Crony science like here in the states.

might be interesting to chime in on an alcoholic drink conversation

i have a memory and that is that the germans believed in a guy named hitler. next they will say they can talk to water, find out what the water droplets are thinking or maybe listen in on a water droplet conversation. a joke of a nation

The interesting question is: if in fact water carries information/recording it's exposures, (instead of using "Memory as a metaphor"), do our bodies use, decode or otherwise benefit from that information...assuming we could call it that.

I find the proposition interesting. The only thing that is definitive is the observed changes...now should come the how and why...in my estimation.

PS...did you read the article also?

I would call it: scientific observation. Sure, no mechanism is identified but science has been looking at this phenomenon forever, especially in regards to resonance and frequencies.

I just wonder if other liquids do the same thing...I would think they do.

I don't know from where you come, CG, but seeing is observing. The experiment had nothing to do with homeopathy or succussion.

I just wonder if other liquids have the same character.

The website is mumbo-jumbo sales.
There is no falsifiable proposition.
Multitudes of wild statements are, 'Not even wrong'

Not enough data in this to determine if this is "science" or not. They are apparently saying that pure unadulterated water changes when you add something to it. Should I be surprised that a flower leaves something behind in water? Not exactly a surprise since water is a great solvent.

I think it's motivated reasoning. They're starting looking for some way homeopathy could be real. It doesn't make any sense, though, so this is the best rationalization there is.

The photos are highly magnified and show the structure of the water molecule. Each is different, opposed to say, a molecule of gold; every molecule of gold looks the same, it has the same structure but Water is different, each molecule is different for having been exposed to something different than the other water molecules.
In the example, (being exposed to the flower) that exposure is represented in the structure of all the molecules of water in the glass...it's the one thing (in this experiment), in common.
The video shows this.

Granted, seeing the water molecule, magnified yourself, in real time, would be preferable.

PS...water is amazing stuff, it seems to structure itself differently according to sounds, harsh sounds-ugly, pleasing sounds-attractive and some scientists claim the same happens with emotions or intents as well...there are plenty of videos showing this...but here...I am with you, I would want to be there, insuring the test is honest, no slights of hand.

This article/video is different than most of those other videos...it represents an actual scientific test, in a class with other participants and not just a show on youtube.

Kinda, but I would have to see the data or pictures more closely.
The H2O isn't changing. Somehow what is mixed in with the water is revealing an impression. That would make sense, if that is what they are getting at.

The structure, what a water molecule looks like after being exposed to something "Not water".
Like the flower in the video.

I remember seeing a water molecule that was tainted with a pollutant, even thought the pollutant was removed, the water never reverted back to the way it looked in the beginning.

I think the use of the concept "Memory" is metaphorical but a better understanding would be: The waters exposure to something is recorded in it's representation, it shape or simply what it looks like after as opposed to what it looked like before.

Does that help?

hmmmmm
Not sure what to make of all of that.
Honestly, it didn't make much sense to me.

View at your leisure.
The fourth phase of water: structured water.
https://youtu.be/i-T7tCMUDXU

Seems to me that water is the most sensitive/receptive liquid/substance of all.