Scientists Show That Water Has Memory
20 plus years ago, it was suggested that water had memory...now science thinks they see it.
"Through this discovery which shows that water has a memory, according to scientists, a new perception of water can be formed. The German scientists believe that as water travels it picks up and stores information from all of the places that it has traveled through, which can thereby connect people to a lot of different places and sources of information when they drink this water, depending on the journey that it has been on."
Here is the article: https://resonance.is/scientists-show-...
Memory definition, the capacity or faculty of retaining and reviving facts, events, impressions, etc., or of recalling or recognizing previous experiences.
I wonder what the water on Mars, the moon, a comet or the Sun could tell us, if we could decode the memories of water?
Brings new meanings to: quenching one's thirst for knowledge!
"Through this discovery which shows that water has a memory, according to scientists, a new perception of water can be formed. The German scientists believe that as water travels it picks up and stores information from all of the places that it has traveled through, which can thereby connect people to a lot of different places and sources of information when they drink this water, depending on the journey that it has been on."
Here is the article: https://resonance.is/scientists-show-...
Memory definition, the capacity or faculty of retaining and reviving facts, events, impressions, etc., or of recalling or recognizing previous experiences.
I wonder what the water on Mars, the moon, a comet or the Sun could tell us, if we could decode the memories of water?
Brings new meanings to: quenching one's thirst for knowledge!
SOURCE URL: https://youtu.be/ILSyt_Hhbjg
(I think it would be appropriate to use the term "recorded" in this experiment)
However: Memory definition, the capacity or faculty of retaining and reviving facts, events, impressions, etc., or of recalling or recognizing previous experiences.
That kind of fits, doesn't it?
I am still wondering if other liquids, absent of H20, would show the same results, like oil products but I suppose there is some H20 in that too, maybe.
There is no falsifiable proposition.
Multitudes of wild statements are, 'Not even wrong'
I find the proposition interesting. The only thing that is definitive is the observed changes...now should come the how and why...in my estimation.
PS...did you read the article also?
'if' - if !
There is no proposition that can be verified or falsified.
I do not watch youtubes. I spent time on their website, hence the opinion.
I noted quantum this, quantum that, energized crystals, black holes, ancient whatever, many links do not work, those that do go to advertising courses.
In this context the word 'science' means the same as in climate science.
I agree about youtube sites, got to be choosy, but the sound was better there than the one posted in the article.
Doc99's comment made an interesting point, check it out.
He thinks he can calculate the mass of an electron from some physical constants which include the Rydberg constant which is calculated with the electron mass being physically measured. Just numerology there.
This sounds closer to mysticism than to science. At this point, I am not impressed. Perhaps a more detailed report would knock my socks off, but as of right now they are still firmly on my feet.
Jan
Using "Memory" as a metaphor at this point in these studies should be tempered in my estimation.
They never did measure the charge even though there obviously was a resonant change.
I thing you have something there, Doc.
https://www.quora.com/What-do-physici...
Do you go looking for pseudoscience sites on purpose?
And...this article was not pseudoscience...this was an honest experiment, although much to be desired, and the metaphor's and posing questions lack thoughts on how to go forward.
personally, I would have liked to see experiments on liquids that do not contain H2O to see if they react the same way.
I just wonder if other liquids do the same thing...I would think they do.
As far as testing other liquids to see if they do the same things as water, I was thinking of Oil products as an example.
Can't think of another liquid that wouldn't have H2O mixed in, right at the moment.
Not sure what to make of all of that.
Honestly, it didn't make much sense to me.
Like the flower in the video.
I remember seeing a water molecule that was tainted with a pollutant, even thought the pollutant was removed, the water never reverted back to the way it looked in the beginning.
I think the use of the concept "Memory" is metaphorical but a better understanding would be: The waters exposure to something is recorded in it's representation, it shape or simply what it looks like after as opposed to what it looked like before.
Does that help?
The H2O isn't changing. Somehow what is mixed in with the water is revealing an impression. That would make sense, if that is what they are getting at.
I just wonder if other liquids have the same character.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpJ-k...
It's still interesting...how often do we get to view molecules changing like this.
This seemed to me to be an honest attempt, sorely lacking the data we all look for, but an honest attempt just the same.
I get what you were saying about the magnification of molecules and it's really hard to see the underlying structure.
In the example, (being exposed to the flower) that exposure is represented in the structure of all the molecules of water in the glass...it's the one thing (in this experiment), in common.
The video shows this.
Granted, seeing the water molecule, magnified yourself, in real time, would be preferable.
PS...water is amazing stuff, it seems to structure itself differently according to sounds, harsh sounds-ugly, pleasing sounds-attractive and some scientists claim the same happens with emotions or intents as well...there are plenty of videos showing this...but here...I am with you, I would want to be there, insuring the test is honest, no slights of hand.
This article/video is different than most of those other videos...it represents an actual scientific test, in a class with other participants and not just a show on youtube.
For anyone to prove water has memory, they would need to make sure there is zero contamination from any sources. Even a slight imperfection in the glass slide would cause a change in structure of the water molecules. Then there is temperature which would need to be maintained to such a point that it would probably be near impossible.
Seems to me if that were possible it would be the ultimate decontamination procedure.
https://slate.com/technology/2013/11/...
I call poppycock.
A mere record of an event would not assume Sentience.
No, not the snowflakes that scream and bawl "Not my president!" and want safe places with coloring books.
The original kind that floats down from a cold cloud.
The fourth phase of water: structured water.
https://youtu.be/i-T7tCMUDXU
Seems to me that water is the most sensitive/receptive liquid/substance of all.