Solver - Thanks for that. As you say, Brett Stephens has his viewpoint/prejudices but states them clearly. Then despite his prejudices he describes in a fair way what he sees.
If you want to read just one article about this orgy of hysteria, then this would be the one.
"One can think of excuses for killing a man; none for assaulting a woman." (emphases added). As if killing "a man" was not itself a form of assault(!) This is pure, Platonic sexism.
He might just as well have said, "killing a man is not as bad as killing a woman." Would anyone caught up in today's gender collectivism take issue with that? Would any woman prefer to be murdered than to be forcibly violated and walk away?
Speaking personally, I would far rather be sexually assaulted than murdered. If that's heresy, make the most of it.
Knowing the role of Stephens in the SC, I can imagine what he said.
Add senility to that and you have a real nightmare to get through.
If you want to read just one article about this orgy of hysteria, then this would be the one.
He might just as well have said, "killing a man is not as bad as killing a woman." Would anyone caught up in today's gender collectivism take issue with that? Would any woman prefer to be murdered than to be forcibly violated and walk away?
Speaking personally, I would far rather be sexually assaulted than murdered. If that's heresy, make the most of it.