I agree. In England at the time of the American Revolution, virtually all property was owned by the Crown and granted to the nobles, who then sold rights to use that property to individuals, but retained "title" to the property, and were thus called the "titled class". That is still true today, except that instead of selling long term (100 year) leases to property rights, now the rights to use the property are sold in perpetuity, and the owner of those rights may re-sell those rights. Pennsylvania was "granted" to William Penn, who was sole ruler (subject to the King's rule) of Pennsylvania. He chose to sell title to the property he had been granted. The same thing happened in other colonies, and the US system of deeds was born. However, even in the US, the government has the right of eminent domain, and can "take back" any land it needs for public use, provided it pays full market value to the title-holder.
I sometimes view history through a prism of "evolution"--the attachment of property rights to individuals other than a "ruling class" was the first step to founding a limited government--Private property acts as a countervailing power to concentrated government, as does religion itself. Compare the Soviet Union, as it abolished both private property and religion. Which is why I feel corporate America has let Americans down by siding with government. I feel corporations have become whiny, cringing lobbyists instead of otherwise competitively practicing entities. Shame on cronyism!
Control is the purpose government sees for itself, but that is not the true purpose of government, unless you mean control of anything that threatens individual rights (including property rights), threatens the external use of force against the people, or that internally threatens force against the people, or that threatens the commerce and business undertaken by the people.
I agree with rockymountainpirate and Ranter. The single word that best describes the purpose of government is 'defend'. Our rights (to life, liberty, and property) are absolute without reference to government. 'Protection' connotes proactive use of force (as in Chicago-style protection). Government's only purpose for existing is to 'defend' our rights to life, 'liberty' and 'property' from the initiation of force or fraud by all bad actors,foreign or domestic. It's only legitimate 'power' is such constitutionally delimited power as is necessary to defend us against the initiation of force or fraud. Government should never have the power to initiate force or fraud.
Well, I'll take my lead from George Washington. A man who could have chosen to be king had he wanted to do so. Yet, voluntarily limited himself and gave up power willingly as the right thing to do. Too few see GW as the greatest president and instead look to those who give themselves and the "people" things.
True enough by the founding documents. Unfortunately corruption has turned power into the purpose of the people running the government. In pretty much every country.
I think the single proper purpose of an uber-government, such as the federal government is: Coordination.
Many of the other purposes, such as defense and liberty and rights can be the prerogative of state governments or even county militia. In order to be able to defend against a common foe, though, someone has to be able to coordinate all of these units together. Similarly, when a child is kidnapped across state lines, there has to be some way of not dropping the search for the child. Water and power that pass through several states also need a coordinating body. (Though in fact this need, like the others, has been leveraged for Power rather than power.) The EU has had to cobble itself together in an attempt to meet the clout of the US, which it cannot attain as separate nations.
So I think it is up to the people to value Liberty and Rights and up to the States (or locals) to train for defense...but it is actually useful to have a government that puts this all into a whole and which has a single great Constitution we all respect.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
"Facilitate", or if you like "To Serve".
But now days its "Control".
Which is why I feel corporate America has let Americans down by siding with government. I feel corporations have become whiny, cringing lobbyists instead of otherwise competitively practicing entities. Shame on cronyism!
Instead we have his polar opposite
So I will stick with my first answer.
The only purpose you see them pursue is Power.
of individual rights
of personal property
of national sovereignty
Well... that is what its purpose has become. We, are all to become good little vassals.
Many of the other purposes, such as defense and liberty and rights can be the prerogative of state governments or even county militia. In order to be able to defend against a common foe, though, someone has to be able to coordinate all of these units together. Similarly, when a child is kidnapped across state lines, there has to be some way of not dropping the search for the child. Water and power that pass through several states also need a coordinating body. (Though in fact this need, like the others, has been leveraged for Power rather than power.) The EU has had to cobble itself together in an attempt to meet the clout of the US, which it cannot attain as separate nations.
So I think it is up to the people to value Liberty and Rights and up to the States (or locals) to train for defense...but it is actually useful to have a government that puts this all into a whole and which has a single great Constitution we all respect.
Jan, long-winded and in much more than one word
"Pay up or we take your rights, freedoms and property."
Load more comments...